Member Info for Computer909

“If Mike had come out in December last year and said financing would be completed by end 2026, you would probably have berated him for setting such a long deadline...”

Well it appears that all the experts on this board seemed to know funding in H1 was unrealistic, so why didn’t the BoD?

Do “real business practices involve” still communicating funding solution in H1 2026 when we are now in H2 2026?

No one said I hate the company, I do have an issue with the way they have communicated or not communicated the delays around the financing that’s all.

Again i come back to the communication from the company, either naive, intentionally misleading, or just simply poorly managed. We wait to see which

“that a hopeful deadline mentioned in an interview is some sort of contract term”

But the timelines set out by the company weren’t just some flippant comment in a little chat, BRES have documented their expected timelines in presentations published on their website, shareholders can be forgiven for holding that information with the same expectation they do any other information released by the company.

Or can we assume no credence can be given to any timeframe the company has set out and “weak” retail shareholders should just take what they are given and not question the information on what investment decisions have been made?

I'm sure it will be the same we have had all year, no real substance and no real updates, and we will see the market react again to the uncertainty he breeds

The expanding narrative is everything relies on financing, the Board have been misleading with regards timelines, we can make excuses for them around expanded JORC or optimised DFS. But in reality they either mislead shareholders regarding timelines or were naive.

Mike has failed to communicate the delay, apart from “not wanting to look desperate”, but this just leaves shareholders with no timeline to attach to an investment, and that has shaken market confidence and hence a continued seller every day for months

Again that brings into question the original messaging around financing timelines were they naive or intentionally misleading

That will be the “supporters” Mike gifted 30m+ confetti equity at 3p with 4p warrants, with no sign of funding news why would they keep the equity, clearly selling and riding the warrants

Keep an eye out for an updated presentation on the website, sliding timeline updates into there seems to be the preferred method recently

Shareprice on 8/1/2026 was 7.25p, exactly what it is now, so that’s just how much “worth” has been added without financing.

Without financing Orom cross is worth today exactly what it was worth at the beginning of the year and exactly what it was when BRES took it over.

It’s as simple as that, a binary play now, financing is needed, and tickling the balls of shareholders with spending £30k on land options doesn’t change that, expanded-drill results have done nothing to improve prospects, and a DFS “Optimisation” has been basically updating a few numbers in a spreadsheet.

So financing in Q3 or even Q4, how does that affect the start of production, what about offtakes that are time sensitive, will Orom cross miss the SAFELOOP supply requirements.

These are the uncertainties that Mike needs to address rather that the regurgitated guffaw he has spewed in the last 3 or 4 appearances.

Everything apart from finance news is now just fluffing to try and maintain interest, the Shareprice action is reflecting the fact that tomorrow is the start of Q3 and we are no further along than we were at the beginning of the year.

If i had bought in at 12p i'm not sure what difference than would make @TitusScroatum

But just for clarity of situation i'll post what point i have bought BRES at

Date Cost per Share

30/04/2021 0.06304

13/04/2021 0.07576

14/07/2021 0.06273

15/11/2021 0.05457

15/11/2021 0.05497

17/12/2021 0.04362

31/12/2021 0.04677

05/01/2022 0.04811

24/01/2022 0.04460

24/01/2022 0.04362

08/02/2022 0.04493

09/02/2022 0.04141

07/03/2022 0.03756

07/04/2022 0.05018

12/04/2022 0.04819

06/05/2022 0.04080

20/05/2022 0.03866

26/05/2022 0.03855

14/06/2022 0.03760

16/06/2022 0.03716

20/06/2022 0.03451

01/07/2022 0.03396

05/07/2022 0.03467

10/08/2022 0.03144

22/08/2022 0.03308

05/09/2022 0.03336

11/10/2022 0.03419

16/01/2023 0.05222

16/01/2023 0.05040

16/01/2023 0.05105

10/07/2023 0.05005

10/07/2023 0.04982

12/07/2023 0.05083

18/07/2023 0.04932

05/09/2023 0.05026

06/09/2023 0.04932

21/09/2023 0.04355

13/10/2023 0.04999

17/11/2023 0.0527

22/11/2023 0.05030

16/1/2024 0.04743

26/1/2024 0.04343

31/1/2024 0.03826

12/02/2024 0.04522

15/2/2024 0.04183

15/2/2024 0.04372

19/2/2024 0.04401

28/3/2024 0.04154

16/04/2024 0.04619

16/04/2024 0.0487

16/04/2024 0.04874

25/7/2024 0.04562

6/11/2024 0.04015

12/11/2024 0.03809

20/3/2025 0.03309

7/04/2025 0.02990

14/04/2025 0.03539

14/04/25 0.03700

16/04/2025 0.03000

16/04/2025 0.03010

8/5/2025 0.02828

8/5/2025 0.02838

2/6/2025 0.03320

19/8/2025 0.03983

20/11/2025 0.07345

20/11/2025 0.07488

21/11/2025 0.07390

28/11/2025 0.08035

03/12/2025 0.08025

11/12/2025 0.06827

17/12/2025 0.06636

I own enough of this company to allow me to say exactly what i want about its current short commings, whether you like it of not.

It’s not bed wetting to point out that the just are regurgitating the same jam tomorrow line , it’s simply a fact

Basically the exact same post from the 9/6/2026

We need delivery not more bluster

“have concluded that computer 909 is probably acting as a fund manager for a competitor of Blencowe and he and others are using CFDs to aggressively short the stock. It is pushing FUD. Time to filter that kind of garbage out.“

So laughably we are at the stage of blaming shorters rather than holding the BOD to account for their actions

Was it Palumbo, who tipped you over the edge perchance?

Well we have seen retail investors get shafted from the likes of Dumbo Palumbo over and over again sure!

“I've invested in about a dozen miners at this stage or development and it will always be like this“

And exactly why do you think Mike went to press with those funding timelines, naivety then , or something else?

“If you latched onto anything said in interviews and think that is a promise or deadline,”

The funding timeline isn’t something “latched” onto in an interview, it is in black and white on the company’s investor relations presentation, we can clearly expect them to drop a new version of that at the end of the week now. Failure to match published timelines are why retail investors are exiting

If they wanted to avoid just this type of selling action the placing should have been done at a lower level without warrants, at least they would have “ripped of the bandaid” rather than these warrant holders drip selling their equity in order to ride the warrants.

As for Sasha I have found him to have been recently very much off his game with regards to Blencowe, whether that’s because the company isn’t supporting him or something else I’m not sure.