Member Info for comek2

It’s obvious HSBC bought on the market, otherwise they would have announced the day of the placing or a day or 2 later. It’s now 2 weeks and shows a vote of confidence in gdr despite the 80p placing price, which as I said then would not have much impact on the sp going forward. From now sp should be on rising trajectory particularly the news expected any day now since today it’s 3 weeks for CE award. Gla

RorkesDrift, thanks for your considered post. I have no problem with people having a different opinion. In fact is healthy and indeed wealthy to consider a contrarian views. What I object to is the deviousness if some posters whether ramping or deramping. these type of people not only cost money to others, but more importantly lead to disruptive (of course their aim) BB and the GENUINE investors having waste time and effort countering agenda based posting. And it’s clear Green23 fits the bill.

FYI, I like the opposite view since it give us holders the opportunity to show case our investment- yes I like being challenged.

Incidentally would you approve of Green23’s disparaging comment about Mr Smith, when until today he’s been all praises??? Hope this point is more than enough.

sharehunter3, another deramper wanting to get in cheaper. You keep talking about shorters? Where do you see them in your a**ehole that is your brain. FYI, shorters will not dare to approach AVCT with all the news in the pipeline- we are still waiting for the promise of “other manufacturers” reiterated in today’s rns.....and then ongoing news re tests ready, sales almost weekly for months if not years to come.

I see no shorters, but you wearing a short the wrong side showing your little “office” from which you’re spouting ****.

Green23, your deramping is all too transparent. Have you sold and want in cheaper, lol? You won’t stop putting a negative slant on today EXCELLENT news. Boohoo selling cheap cloths, lol? It’s called a niche market and made the company into a billion worth in no time....primark another one. Plus as you’ve been reminded but still wouldn’t let go of your idiotic analysis, our consumer test is cheap AND MEANT TO BE CHEAP AS PER OUR CEO, Walmart slogan : “Pile them and sell them cheap”.....oops sorry, you would rather poorer people DIE of coronavirus, hey. And being the arrogant wa**er you are you dare criticise Mr Smith’s judgment.

The sp will end very blue today and keep waiting to get in cheaper!!! Don’t bother to reply, I don’t entertain idiots.

Green23
Posts: 171
Price: 142.00
No Opinion
RE: Avacta's distribution deal makes sense - here's why
Today 10:48
Well, I do hope I've misjudged it. Still love the tech and feel it will be successful, but with regard to this particular deal, the name feels too 'fashion ' orientated or someone who sells crystals and incense. Perhaps the son who likes flaunting his bling on Instagram came up with it. Plus I'm not sure an association with a cheap and tacky clothing brand is the thing a potential customer really wants in their mind when trying to consider how reliable a pharmaceutical test might be. Can't see the need for the exclusive part either. Feels like the Boohoo mob have had rogered the CEO over a barrel on this one and exposed his commercial naivety.

This exclusive deal with medusa as a distributor WILL NOT EXLUDE AMAZON AS A RESELLER, ie buy the test from us to then resell to their customers since the market is GLOBAL....and amazon will want a share of profit from such HUGE PROFIT MAKING PRODUCT.

Has the following sunk in yet?

“AT THE TOUCH OF A SMARTPHONE APP...BOOHOO SHIPPING TO 229 TERRITORIES WORLDWIDE”

Well all Boohoo teenagers customers who drives us mad with their iPhones will be ordering their test with their pants, tops etc... at the TOUCH OF BOOHOO SMART PHONE.

Another excellent point about this deal is the Katmanis’s Indian origin. As successful Indians you bet they have good contacts with the decision makers in India, the 2nd global market in population terms. I’m sure this hasn’t escaped our great scientist but also a shrewd businessman Mr Smith....or the Katmanis would have whispered in his ears “India market, leave to us!”....it works like that even in the us or anywhere else.

Btw, Ms Psychology is changing into blue suspenders soon today she says, cause the excellent today news will soon sink in.

Worth repeating with CAPS: “AT THE TOUCH OF A SMARTPHONE APP...BOOHOO SHIPPING TO 229 TERRITORIES WORLDWIDE”...from the article below.

I see some derampers (to get in cheap) are playing down the significance of this news.

Read the article below about Boohoo global network etc....

Basically medusa will be using Boohoo worldwide distributions networks servicing 229 countries. I bet people inc some not so impressed holders would have been happier with a big pharma doing the distribution. Yet ironically such pharma would want a much bigger margins compared to medusa. Therefore this deal is another master stroke from our CEO Mr smith as the biggest share of the profit will go to avacta. Reflect and let it sink in.

You could say Boohoo is our Amazon in terms of distribution. Boohoo that had quickly grown into a billion company, will be sending the test with the goods they have successful been selling to their customers- free marketing for Avacta too. Medusa will be a new company on paper only, you bet they’ll be using Boohoo distribution as the son works for the father and setting medusa is the father helping his son to be successful in his own right- wouldn’t anyone?

“Manchester, London, New York... Burnley - inside Boohoo's enormous global distribution centre”

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/whats-on/shopping/boohoo-burnley-distribution-centre-expansion-14210161.amp

Hippy!!!!

Hants, now you’re moving the goalpost.....into the theme of cancer, lol...even there your hole seems to have no bed.

Your ’laughing’ point, at yourself now it’s clear, about my post was that vaccine is ONLY PREVENTIVE. My point was it could also be THERAPEUTIC, hence making it clear to you in caps only “in the case of CORONAVIRUS...NOT ANY OTHER”.

So Mr KNOWLEDGE, the light of the evidence from the FDA about therapeutic vaccine, can you now answer my question in the post you laughed at, taking into consideration side effects and cost, ie how will you administer the vaccine without testing FIRST? And please stop being ”l’idiot du village”, embarrassing yourself further and just deal with the issue raised. Thanks

hants (and 13thmonkey)

Your definition of vaccine is not only limited but rusted. Ever heard of therapeutic vaccine, even the FDA approved it ???!!! As I warned you, don’t try to make others look fool to only expose yourself as such, and you’ve done again- I believe Ms Smith may have meant therapeutic vaccine but not used the word vaccine cause it is associated with the old interpretation.

hants, arrogance always stands on a cardboard stand covering a large hole. Now Read on.

10 Promising Therapeutic Vaccines

“Now there is evidence that therapeutic vaccines actually can work. Therapeutic vaccines are meant to combat existing disease rather than offer lasting protection against infection, as traditional vaccines do. The FDA approved the first therapeutic vaccine in April 2010.”

https://www.fiercepharma.com/special-report/10-promising-therapeutic-vaccines

hants, can you please explain how the CORONAVIRUS vaccine, NOT ANY OTHER, is to be administered without testing FIRST. we are talking about an infectious and a DEADLY virus. The caps are to assist you, since you like to make people look a fool only to expose yourself as such. Good luck with being stuck in your much awaited explanation!

Even if/ when vaccine is found, you will still need to test FIRST ...for both side effect and cost.

You don’t give a vaccine to non infected person only to then make ill with side effects. And since vaccine cost 30-50 more than tests, why spend billions nationally and trillions globally on people who don’t need it?

And the only way to find out who needs it is to test the whole population so those, inc asymptomatic cases, don’t go on infecting others and we be back to square one with the virus.

Vanilla, “How about T for Takeover for Ten Billion”......well well Moderna, our partner of FIVE YEARS, added $10 billion to their mcap after they announced their vaccine development work the coronavirus- btw, didn’t Mr Smith say last Friday our potential treatment is quicker than a vaccine?

I was being modest with £1 billion although I qualified it with “in the short term.” Now that you got me going, how about T for Takeover for Ten Trillion? Not achievable??? Well leave some avct shares in your will for your future great great grand children. They will then be able to employ the best medium to pleasantly inform you of the achieved 10 trillion, lol. Plus affirmers technology will have been perfected to the point where the dead will be revived and we brought back to life to enjoy our riches and still continue to invest in avct.

Incidentally, how about swapping the V for a T for Vanilla....and you can name your share price, lol. Plus Tanilla sound more exotic. And with the share price going bonkers, you will be able not only to get your V back, but also buy all the vanilla manufacturers the world over and eat to your heart content- affirmers could even make vanilla, lol. GL for tomorrow and weeks to come, exciting times ahead.

Avacta has just added the 4T, the most important, to the government/health experts coronavirus slogan:

Test, Track, Trace, Treat!

What an achievement, the process starts with and ends with Avacta, ie total solution to this pandemic and the lockdown of the world economy wrapped up in Avacta affirmers!!!

A billion company in its own right, ie without a take over, is no longer a dream and achievable in a relatively short time.

And Ms Psychology is saying £4 for the 4 Ts in about 4 weeks. Anyone to buy the ‘ticke’ for the show?

If you’d like to add the 5th T for ‘threaten’ (the virus as it enters the body), then make it £5 in about 5 weeks- well if Ncyt can get to £5 with a limited test market target, Avct sp can easily more than surpass that with the whole global market as its target.

Sorry I’ve run out of ‘T’, but will get some more in the next few weeks, talking of which Ms Psychology says she will be wearing strong blue suspenders starting from tomorrow, particularly when the news of “other partners” lands. And you should really be using your brain to join the dots rather than your eyes and your hands, though understandably as she moves in her blue suspenders must be very dazzling.

Oh, there is another T, TALKING to some big Pharmas about the coronavirus virus TREATMENT of Friday Rns, which Mr Smith declined to answer in his TALK (this is free T) to the media. But sp won’t be revealed now because it will be HUGE.

Btw, Ms Psychology says she is happy with anyone to offer any T.

Welcome to the new AVACTA: Advanced Very Active Coronavirus Tackler Affirmers.

What do people make of the linked post posted few mns ago?

comek2
Posts: 575
Price: 175.00
Strong Buy
New linkedin post , 10 mns agoToday 14:49
Have people seen the new LinkedIn post, 10 mns ago ???

genedrive
genedrive
956 followers
10m
The Indian Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS) has released their data on the Genedrive HCV ID kit, showing 100% concordance to the Abbott Real Time HCV test in their Indian cohort.

https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/company/genedrive-plc

https://lnkd.in/eu2QATF

#gdr #hcv #hepatitisc #gettingthingsdone #WHO #ILBS

Have people seen the new LinkedIn post, 10 mns ago ???

genedrive
genedrive
956 followers
10m
The Indian Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS) has released their data on the Genedrive HCV ID kit, showing 100% concordance to the Abbott Real Time HCV test in their Indian cohort.

https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/company/genedrive-plc

https://lnkd.in/eu2QATF

#gdr #hcv #hepatitisc #gettingthingsdone #WHO #ILBS

OilNovice, aha now it’s makes complete sense, thanks very much for the further clarification. You’re not a “novice” after all, lol ....but modesty is a sign of sense of character. Enjoy your earnings from avact for weeks, months if not years to come. GL and thanks again, much appreciated!!!

Mr Smith says he is looking for a big pharma to develop TREATMENT for Covid-19. You bet BIG Danaher will get down to its knees BEGGING its little part Cytiva to put in a good word to Mr Smith.....cause such treatment will involve $ 100s BILLIONS and BILLIONS. Just look at Moderna, just announcing their involvement in trying to develop covid19 vaccine added just under $10 BILLIONS to its market cap yes TEN BILLIONS. Now think of the REVENUES....just mind boggling!!!

Come on hurry up Danaher, or Roche, Pfizer etc....will get in first.

OilNovice, thanks for your helpful input and clarification. While reading the rns I got distracted by Miss Psychology changing from red suspenders to blue ones, lol.

I note Mr Smith saying it’s better than a vaccine or words to that effect. However affirmers were used in the Zeka virus and in the rns he says “ Neutralising therapies could be given to those exposed to the virus (such as health and social-care workers) to prevent infection”... and in the same sentence adds ( ie contrast???) “as well as to patients already infected by the virus, to help treat and prevent disease progression.”, ie ”prevent infection“ vs “already infected”.....so what do you administer to “prevent infection“, since treatment is for present illness? Obviously not contradicting Mr Alistair, but can’t get around what to use to “prevent infection”, especially “for those exposed to the virus such as health workers” etc....

Today’s RNS:

“Affimer reagents that block the binding of the virus spike protein to ACE2 therefore have the potential to prevent infection and act as "neutralising" therapies.

Neutralising therapies could be given to those exposed to the virus (such as health and social-care workers) to prevent infection, as well as to patients already infected by the virus, to help treat and prevent disease progression.“

Scarabbeatle, Of course it’s not a vaccine YET, but it’s THE POTENTIAL TO DEVELOP THE VACCINE, hence “STOP INFECTION”. or am I reading it wrong???? Don’t think so!!! Anyone to help clarify?