RE: sp24 Apr 2020 18:16
Zeus, there is demand for Fruitflow, but at present, currently not to the extent that is needed to roll in the cash. It's an excellent product with more possible beneficial effects than can be currently supported by published science. This product has been hampered by poor (IMO only) Provexis management dating back many years and, I have to assume, a pretty lack -lustre performance by the DSM team. Male contributors to this forum may have noticed some other beneficial advantages to improved bloodflow. Just imagine if the Chinese, for example, got knowledge of that! They could dispense with the ground Rhino horn which would be of immeasurable relief to the poor old Rhino. Could not DSM have alluded to that benefit when discussing blood flow without actually mentioning ED? Many other companies allude to an attribute of their product without having to show scientific data.