Member Info for colbaltblue

I expect questions will be asked today about the financial aspects of the

It's not a "fact" that it's going to be another year. It's your opinion based on your view.

Anything could happen at anytime.

In the words of the Iron Lady (paraphrased)

"Rejoice at that news"

PCS, I think that's a fair assessment.

I do believe there's been a degree of confirmation bias by some and playing devils advocate by others.

Important day tomorrow.

It must be a struggle to keep the SP at current levels as most buys are going through at full ask.

....... that all the whining doomsters have been talking *******s all week........

I'll be checking in with a huge degree of trepidation. The general pessimistic tone of the last few days, especially today, has done nothing to allay my fears.

Todays sales are a bit concerning as "someone" on the AIM always knows something.

In short, a good place for a PI to be atm.

"Dr Stephen Parker, Executive Chairman of Sareum, said: "While the need to terminate this study is frustrating, the preliminary data strongly suggest that the findings are unlikely to be associated with SDC-1801"

Surely, it would have been rather reckless to say this if 1801 had failed dramatically? The animals affected weren't even given 1801. It's all above my paygrade but i do think some people are really over-egging the situation for the worst.

Mattyboy. Off topic, URU certainly looks interesting. Could do very well.

Hopefully, you'll give it a rest until we know for sure. You've been moaning all week to what aim exactly!

Some people have come to pretty dire conclusions without any facts to justify their pessimism. SP seems certain that 1801 is not to blame. No other details were given so everything is guesswork and conjecture IMO.

If the doomsters are proved wrong, there will be an almighty bounce from these levels.

When others are fearful!

Now, I wonder who said that?🤔

Very much a negative take on the RNS when in reality, we're looking at unknown unknowns.

Have you not read the RNS?

Dick, I can't keep up with your sudden swings! You seem to switch your opinion very quickly!

Reading SP's comments, he seems as sure as he's able to say, that he doesn't believe the issues are as a result of a failure of 1801.

There has been some frightenly negative but well- written narrative over the WE but in truth, non of us know Jack Sh*t about what's happened.

Sorry posted too early......

........It could be argued that 1801 is actually one step forward and has proved safe.

Probably because the animals treated with 1801 were fine. It was the other cohort not given 1801 who have shown some issues so it could be a

If you change the misleading subject heading, you might get a response. To repeat, the toxicology trial has not failed. The protocols seem to have failed.