Member Info for Cocobeans

Tell me where i have lied? They raved about the CAD asset, the company they was business was linked to the cowboy, they tried to pull the wool over the markets eyes with some premium share nonsense, the company ramped it, retweeted everything, Nick was on record saying it was a formlitity

its only cause the shareprice tanked on the news they didnt do the deal, the BOD was just desperate to get the price up. It was pure promotional amateur ramp stuff like the helium (when helium was being ramped, like BTC treasury) its fine, but thats what you get when you had a stock promoter, health promoter and a podcaster running a mining company!!

Nick and scott still need to go before this is a serious business BTW

Eloro- i dont need a crystal ball, i think you need to research

ECR raised money for this Raglan acquisition, at this point they had enough run way to Q1 2026 ie now

someone stated Q2 2026- ok lets take that.

That means they have 3 months money left, they have no revenue and the initial production from Raglan will start in say Feb.

The initial production wont cover £1m of ECR G&A per year and they cannot go into production with no money on the hip ie working cap! say a machine failed or they needed cash to do something

Therefore, its pretty obvious they need to raise an amount probably £500-750k to tie them over for the year. it happens EVERY YEAR, THIS IS A PRE REVENUE BUSINESS, any shareholder SHOULD WANT ECR to have cash on their HIP.

The only time ECR wont need money from the markets is when BM is in full swing which is likely to be 2027.

Its just the fact of running a pre revenue listed business.

Its not being negatitive its stating a discussion point

Eloro- you have alot of catching up to do. I’ve been balanced- if they get into full production, all good.

In meantime, they will run a small production, which won’t cover costs and there is a gap in the balance sheet.

My issue is 2-4 posters (who are paid) keep setting unrealistic timescales, they don’t mention the negatives like all the failed transactions (Canada, helium, tax losses, BTC nonsense) ECR wasted soooo much time this year chasing nonsense hype sectors that they wasted a year on BM when they said in 24’ that in 25’ BM would be in production

Issue is people say don’t worry about the past, but that’s all we have to base our opinions on, as the spent (this bod) 2 years and diluted and issued themselves shares but yeh share price is the same

Several weeks EQUALS 1 month

glad you acknowledge that intial production wont cover ECR overheads and there will be a ramp up period, so the first year there will be a gap in revenue vs overheads and taht will be plugged by a placing

you dont finance G&A , not sure why you get so protective, its obvious they need to plug a gap and thats fine.

but might aswell say it and then its not a shock like the last one when its done at a discount

grades and amounts will be an issue, as will the reliability of equipment but that will all be thrashed out when they start in a couple of months time

again a few weeks equals month

no need to mismanage people expectations via a ramp here

no comment on the fact that the shareprice is the same after a year?

well done for making zero returns, just what investors are putting their hard earnt in the market to do

hilarious as you guys cannot give any balance, ive always said, gamechanger is FULL production NOT initial NOT ramp up

yet as we can all agree- FULL production at BM isnt happening anytime soon

Dixi- nope as always i wish the genuine holders well, its the paid PR that are misleading again

they change like the wind, always pushing like things are going to happen tomorrow

once BM is in full production, then ECR are in a great position but thats not an easy road and will take time

the raglan to BM initial mining wont make ECR, and it wont make it self sufficient,

short term one more fund raise and then see if they can actually get producing anything without issues

Turnkey isnt a flick of a switch, still needs staffing, equipment to work, buyer agreements, and grades to make money.

Paid PR dont like to highlight any risk, there is still loads and at the smaller end of the market, there will always be bumps in the road

if your long term 2years, you will likely see a decent return but dont expect it in next couple of months pre fundraise

good luck and ignore the paid PR ramping

The licence running out isnt really an issue unless they start for 9 months and then cant get it renewed but they will still have the equipment etc

the issue here is the fact that they have 8 weeks of not being able to start production, then planning etc

you dont just buy a licence and next day have everything up and running

we all know that they only have 3 months money on the hip and early production wont generate enough to make this self sufficient, plus all the upfront costs, people costs and any issues that they have (which they will, as all companies regardless of who they are have issues)

so what news in the next 4 weeks will be enough to absorb another fundraise?

The weather is an issue for a couple of months so they won’t be able to move people and equipment about.

It’s not as simple as just starting production, Bottom is misleading using weeks, well 8-12 weeks is 2-3 months.

In meantime, news void and share price drift, especially when company needs to start looking at raising money soon

On cue. The rampers (paid) are at it.

Share price doesn’t lie. It’s gone up 0% in 12 months

I said there was a trade from 0.2 - read my tweets.

The normal nonsense here but weather, lack of money and the fact they diluted all holders at 0.2 when they said they wouldn’t.

Not only that, but it cost £500k +to buy a licence that is tiny and expires in 15months for equipment that needs fully testing.

ECR have no contingency money should the start operations and thing fail.

Fact is they need liquidity to raise again.

This is an exploration company , some don’t understand business. You’re never going to go into a risk operation with no contingency money. ECR have very little left after all.

As for tax stuff- market waiting 20 years- it’s a nonsense and cannot be put into place for years if ever.

It’s just something to try and provide a story, better just forgetting about it.

I have said before once BM is in FULL production, no trial, then this gives ECR optionality but until then, it’s the same wheeled out nonsense

The fact is they need to secure the future of the business and they need money to do this!

It’s just a fact of running a plc that generates no money.

A lot of work for them to do - alot of hurdles before they are anywhere near self sufficient

What happened to the partnership agreements that Talk and button tried to ramp

Nick is a talker, not a mining expert, his job is to promote and he has proven to say anything to keep interest.

Now raglan is complete they need to deliver but can’t for 2 months +

In meantime, money drains and that’s a fact.

Bottom and talking are paid to say otherwise

I havent posted on here until now.

ECR delivered NOTHING on their promises this year. Raglan was a project that came up and they went for it. Nothing is guaranteed there, the mining side is pretty small and might cover some costs and the machinery needs validating but they talk a good game around this.

Weather for production is now an issue but people know this.

Still absolutely nothing on BM production, so what happened if Raglan didnt happen?

Reality is, its a wasted year, drill, issue nothing results, more analysis etc. They havent a real plan on BM in terms of locations etc still, so maybe still 9-12 months away!

Congratulations to the board, the price at start of 2025 started at 0.3 and will end at 0.3- great reward for investors. ALL IN THE BEST GOLD BULL RUN!

The normal paid PR on this board, will try and take over my post, but shareprice is the reward and its the same as it was 12 months ago

2026- They have all their eggs in this Raglan/ BM tie up, other than that, a placing will be needed in Q2 as they wont have enough run way into any production for overruns or issues

Could ECR deliver a small producing project- well yes. Is it a game changer, well NO. They need BM is FULL FULL production and that just isnt happening anytime soon. Still no licences, no location, etc

So they got VERY lucky on Raglan and the best thing that happened was the cowboy left

Still they have Nick and Scott sucking up money for no reason, lets see what is delivered in Q1.

Until then, the production from Raglan will cover costs, they need more money for BM for initial and full production

thats still 12months or so away, and if Talking or Bottom say anything else, well we know for a fact you are both Paid PR. so do with that as you will

good luck and happy new year to the genuine holders

Until the warrant selling begins, volumes way off, sector on its behind and £50m worth of selling to come!

SWC need a miracle as they have less than £300k cash!

Whats the plan then? as all i see is a load of nonsense PR.

They promised loads on OTC, no money came in

They have nothing apart from BTC on a balance sheet (at a lose)

they should be slimming down the staff/fat and telling shareholders/investors how they expect to generate revenue, as at some stage this will be delisted or forced to sell

Cash, please explain what they are actually doing? they go to events, talk on social media BUT what is it they actually do?

from an outsider, there isnt much to do once you own the BTC on the balance sheet, other than raise more cash?

its a very expensive hobby for shareholders this, where they only need a minimal staff, why so many employees

where is the US investor money they promised

this is a nothing business that is simply using shareholder money to live a life.

Seed money and pre ipo money

hardly inviting secondary market buyers at 12x that

They were looking at selling their italian asset

https://news.sky.com/story/william-hill-owner-eyes-sale-of-italian-arm-amid-reeves-tax-threat-13475309

EVOK business is so much more UK focused

From April 2026 there will be an increase in remote gaming duty from 21 to 40 per cent and abolition of bingo duty from its current 10 per cent rate.

"From April 2027, a new rate of general betting duty for remote betting will be introduced at 25 per cent, excluding self-service betting terminals, spread betting, pool bets, and horseracing.

Gambling duty reform

3.39 Several changes to gambling duties have been announced in the Budget which overall are

estimated to raise £1.1 billion by 2029-30. From April 2026 there will be an increase in

remote gaming duty from 21 to 40 per cent and abolition of bingo duty from its current 10

per cent rate. From April 2027, a new rate of general betting duty for remote betting will be

introduced at 25 per cent, excluding self-service betting terminals, spread betting, pool bets,

and horseracing. The Government has also announced a freeze in casino gaming duty

bands in 2026-27 with the usual RPI uprating thereafter.

3.40 The behavioural responses to these changes are uncertain but are estimated to reduce the

yield by around one-third. We estimate that operators will seek to pass through around 90

per cent of the duty increases by increasing prices or reducing payouts, leading to a

reduction in consumer demand which reduces the yield from the measure by £0.5 billion by

2029-30. The elasticities used to estimate the demand effect also capture potential

substitution to the illicit market, and substitution between different forms of gambling due to

the tax differentials introduced through this policy. We also assume that operators will over

time restructure their product offering to minimise tax costs, given the policy creates wide

differentials between rates across different forms of gambling, reducing the yield by a

further £0.1 billion.

Down on the BTC holdings, company cannot raise, they have no money and have 110m warrants at 2.5p with a bond holder of £10m they need to find to repay. which looks more and more likely that they will have to sell BTC or do a huge CLN to repay.

company is slowly dying and yet Webley keeps pushing hats and jumpers and spending THOUSANDS on travel and nonsense.

The guys isnt fit to run a £5m company let alone a £100m company as he is simply out of his depth and got VERY VERY lucky

Wonder if the selling is front runners of future placing

So the rules doesnt apply to Aquis stocks? i

AAI i dont follow just saw some interview and him slamming companies like SWC

Paul Mathieson is suggesting these plays can be delisted as SWC has no operating business as per the new rules

what has webley said on this? do swc comply?