Member Info for cluelessinvestor

What evidence do YOU have that there isn't a bidding war?

Pull your trousers up boy and get on with your day.

You seem to be very insistent on the fact that we should only consider 2moz and anything above that is speculative, not the first time you've mentioned it, you make it sound anyone who refers to it is 4 years old and believes in it like the toothfairy.

Despite the fact that EUA have consistently referred to these target resources and specifically mentioned it in the latest investor report in September.

Ridiculous spread, always ruins the chance for a strong finish.

Personal insults have just come from frustration IMO.

Frustration against the posters who flip flap their opinions, you've got a number of individuals here who claimed this was going back to 10p in August and were openly short, then they changed their opinions and said "looks good for a £1 sale, I'm all in, topped etc.".

Now all of a sudden, they've changed their tune again and are saying things like 25p sale looks likely.

It's not on, LTH are bound to get frustrated by this constant crap. Bottom line is, if you want to trade, do your trades, if you want open a short, open a short, but don't spread crap about the company without any evidence to back it up and then get annoyed when someone throws insults at you.

Patientone,

I appreciate that no one likes to see a loss, but regardless of whether you bought in at 0.2 or at 45p, the fundementals of the company and the position we are in, in terms of what's in the ground, the value, the parties involved and the opportunity of making some sort of profit exists for all.

LTH being defensive in this BB has got nothing to do with feeling comfortable with the fact that they've already made money, it's all about what we saw yesterday with posters who start out claiming they are trying to bring a balanced opinion, then as time goes on it comes out that they've sold out and they want to get back in cheaper. How is that fair? It's only right of LTH here to defend the company against attacks which have no evidence.

What a lot of you don't realise is LTH have dealt with this for a very long time, and everytime they are proven to be right, don't have a go at us, have a go at those who are posting to influence their own trades.

Which is fair enough, but that doesn't mean you have to throw constant shots just because you want to get back in cheaper.

You wouldn't be the first to want to do that, how many thought that they would get back in at 15p? Failures.

Took you long enough to show your true colors Amanensia.

When will people like you learn? You can't stop this train now.

I do remember a few months ago when Onassis appeared and a few posters were saying watch out for him because he changes his opinion based on his current trade at the time, then I read on Twitter by a few posters that he was deramping before suspension. Ian's post just confirms what we thought.

I repeat, when this is all over, keep an eye out for the names who were actually being helpful and the names who were just posting to protect their current trade.

I’m sure HappyScott has had a go at Onassis in the past for ramping because he said news tomorrow.

Now that his tune has changed, what a surprise, HappyScott is defending him.

You couldn’t make it up at this point.

I seen a few people mention this company, how on earth can you compare a company that may go into administration following the end of the FSP to EUA?

People love to clutch at straws sometimes, someone compared their losses in Hurricane Energy to us the other day, found it hilarious that they didn’t even realise what went wrong there and that they had tons of time to get out when the writing was on the wall.

I was just passing by here to read a few posts and I spotted good old Calamity, ignore him, he's one of the worst derampers on LSE, good luck to those invested here, might bring some money after it's released from EUA if the share price here hasn't ran off into 1-2p by then.

Gecko,

Remember, BASHERS NEVER Bash A BAD STOCK. Check the boards for stocks with no potential. They never have any Bashers. Bashers only go after stocks that are moving up or have excellent potential to do so. Bashers work to bring the price down to either increase their position at the expense of others or get paid to help a Short make their bones. They are going to kick up as much dusk as they can before the sale is announced. Hold on to your golden tickets guys it's gonna be massive.

Remember, REMEMBER GECKO!

"It's quite possible that you are right. It's also quite possible that you are wrong! But I find the best thing to do in such situations is to ask myself how the view would change if the opposite were the case,"

Of course, as is the inherent risk of the stock market, the job of a private investor is to step back and view everything at face value. Having been invested for over a year, the facts provide the strong basis of a viewpoint to quite a substantial sale, as it has for many other long term holders who have stayed here despite making HUGE profits.

Great example would be Phil Taylor who could have been excused for selling 1m out of 28m shares to enjoy some of his profits, yet his confidence is so strong he's decided to put it back in.

There's a lot of great shares on offer in the market right now, but the fear of missing out here is so strong that none of them entice me enough to sell up or even trade here. I know the next response will be don't fall in love with a share, but honestly, I love the fact that I am so content with my investment that I no longer have to wakeup at 8am or stress every 30 mins about the share price.

"RMR/montyboz - I've been involved with enough of these to know that the lawyers are not appointed once a deal is negotiated but as soon as reasonably practicable once the decision to sell is made, to wait would be pure negligence on the part of the BOD!"

That in it self oozes confidence though, when the FSP first started, a lot of people claimed this was just a futile attempt to sell by a desperate BOD.

The fact that the BOD took their time to announce DLA Piper, which occured AFTER the board changes that were specifically carried out to focus on the FSP. Every step of the process, even from suspension, the appointment of Iain Rawlinson, James Nieuwenhuys, UBS, DLA Piper, the board changes, constantly referring to "securing a deal beneficial to our shareholders".

These are not just small irrelevant cats that no one has heard of, something big is going on behind the scenes and that's why I believe it is taking so long.

When it is all said and done, and we have a final result, the life changing memory of EUA will live on in people's minds and the posts left by individuals here trying to sway opinions one way or another.

You'll either be left thanking long term holders like Mac, Gecko, Ian, Tilly, and many others.

Or you'll be kicking yourself for listening to people like Calamity, HappyScott, RNSMan, PickedNuts, Parsley, TDT, Spikey, etc.

You will then understand, the dynamics behind the battle between long term investors, day traders, shorters and bedwetters.

Pay close attention because you'll find the same names and posting styles of trouble causers in loads of different shares.

Are you really, really still coming back with the clueless toothless stuff, you're actually terrible at this.

Go back and crawl under the rock you came from, no one wants you here. I'd rather have RNSman who could actually back his crap up with some level of credibility.

Nah mate, you've been watching the thread the whole time and since the share price decided to go up and everyone was calling you out, you decided to hide away like you always do, the fact that you are here during a rise is you just trying to save face but your credibility on this website has already been destroyed.

Typical that HappyScott decided to disappear as soon as I called his bull**** out on pure facts.

If the share price drops in the next few days, expect him to turn up with the mantra that he here to save the world from rampers and that we are attacking him for predicting an 80p sale.

Suspect HappyScott is just one of a bunch of traders EUA has, there's a lot of known traders through both here, ADVFN, Twitter, etc.

No, no one attacks you for predicting a sale of 40-80p sale.

You are attacked for supporting all the derampers when they up and tell them well done or well said, just because you don't directly deramp.

You only turn up when the share price is going down, and you decide for some reason to dig the blade in further? Why, why on earth would someone want to post a single drop of negativity on to a share price which is falling, that further creates a false narrative that derampers and trolls can run with as we saw over the weekend with the fake news about the MT licence, all you are doing is feeding it further.

You are attacked for ironically attacking anyone who has a 'unrealistic' sale price of £2+, which if what you claim about being attacked for a lower end prediction for the sale was true, makes you a hypocrite and just as bad as the people you call out.

Get your agenda straight HappyScott, no one knows why you post the way you do but get it straight, no one is attacking you for your share price prediction.

My question to all you 'holders' who keep hooting about this so called 'ramping'

If you believe that this share is being ramped at 30-40p levels, surely that means you don't believe there is value left and you would then make a swift exit?

Sick of all this 'ramping' crap, go learn what ramping is before you accuse well informed and risk adverse LTH's who have spent ages doing their research and defending the company from the onslaught of constant attacks. Go fufil your day trading and expert shorting dreams somewhere else, genuine holders won't stand for this crap.