Member Info for cjmorley

@nookie

This has nothing to do with warrants

It's neutral.

Normally dillution is by shares issue to raise funds. This can be bad if cash is require to keep the lights on.

If funds raised are to aquire assets then that is good if the market believes the asset has equal value.

In this case the asset is clearly valuable. Dilution offset by the value of the asset procured,

The article is dated 17 Dec 2021.
Whilst the content is valid, it will not move sentiment.

@stevebt

The spike last year was driven by good news and the hope of future high quality mineralisations.

The herd piled in and we were over bought.

Since then major bonanza drilling at E Hill. DSO at Hanc0ck. and others...

We are a very different animal today I think.

Tom

Often the UC trade is a late small adjustment. Friday was a 7million trade which will have been worked throught the day.

Monday open is likely to retain most of this large uplift.
I have a fancy an RNS may appear at 07-00

Now that would be nice. :-)

UncleJim

I think your timescale is wrong.

If Hanc0ck and Elizabeth Hill results keep coming at the excellent rate. Then 1.5p is possibly only weeks away.

Medium term (12 months) I am hopeful of 5p.

Understandably, we have a very late 'price monitoring extention' RNS

ETF

If Tommy is correct H.

Then you have scored a direct hit.. Well done.

You may well be correct H.

We will know at 16-45

Ben

You have epitomized all I have been saying for six months.

It is clearly a rubbish proposition that a company the size of JPM would waste time an this scale for peanuts

Shorts are not significant in GGP SP movements.

SP just shot up by 12%

No RNS.... What is driving this?

@Hydro

" at any moment."

Most people would interpret this as at longest a month?

Please tell us your guesstimate?

Fundamentaly I agree, But not for at least 9 months.

S Day reply

Yes this Bamps chap always underestimates the up side of GGP

@Hydro

May I remind you that the share price will have no effect on the 5% valuation.

We discussed this to death recently

@Hydro

"NCM tried to get the 5% cheap.... by using proxies to short the share,"

You have absolutely no evidence to support this slanderous statement.

I hope you are right. And this drop of 9% is just a tree shake of 'stop losses'.

Or perhaps some algo has responded to your attempt to sell 4,000,000

2022-03-16T10:59:05.983 GBX 14.337 20924 2999.87388 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX
2022-03-16T10:58:55.057 GBX 14.337 20 2.8674 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX
2022-03-16T10:58:53.280 GBX 14.135 60000 8481 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX
2022-03-16T10:58:47.933 GBX 14.07 187381 26364.5067 Off-Book XOFF P ECHO
2022-03-16T10:58:21.257 GBX 14.135 5057 714.80695 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX
2022-03-16T10:55:08.387 GBX 14.35 153109 21971.1415 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX
2022-03-16T10:52:22.630 GBX 14.35 3401 488.0435 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX
2022-03-16T10:48:24.000 GBX 13.9 500000 69500 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX
2022-03-16T10:47:10.727 GBX 14.16 98 13.8768 Off-Book AIMX P AIMX

After the "big sell" the price went up not down. So your theory falls!!
Either way shorts if any are not significant

@Hydro
"Ceej.. math just not you're strong point."

A clear typo. The numbers are correct

Amongst your many faults you are an arogant peice of work

Just noticed I wrote 0.1%

It should read 1% not 0.1%
Luckily the share actual numbers are correct.

Typing faster than a rather old brain could keep up with :-)