Member Info for Chuggley

Pcr is worse gives far more false positives if you include dead virus. Non contagious/ infectious

False positives? Isn't that more a PCR issue
Besides. Surely better than no test.

Upomega you're an idiot. I'm not sure how you've missed my bin. Off you go. To the echo chamber

Don't patronise me velasDICK. Off to the bin you go

Upomega. Not that again. Don't be a pratt and don't embarrass yourself. Or is that green you're smoking too strong for you ?

Tools me ar5e wh1pe. What do you get from an £8b contract. Numbnuts

Maybe we've increased capacity yet more

To be fair it sounds high. So 1. Maybe it's for more tests. 2. It includes a large volume of antibody tests too (good for us) 3. Both of these
And perhaps it's an overestimate.... but would suggest an annual figure exceeding £0.5b per year

Ignoring the month of high volume testing in schools. If we take the government desire for 2m test per day. We can divide this figure by approx 7 so for 2m per week for 12 months it would suggest approx £1.15b

When I pop back here to have a quick look. I see why I left. Bunch of numb nuts

He's definitely one for your filter. He's been filtered by me for a long time due to his constant moans. Groans. Criticism

I'll be very happy if this is right. Fingers crossed

The market needs to hear the 2m a week capacity is being utilised.... simply tired of hearing we should have ..

Does it matter much how many staff screen4 have. They neither manufacture the tests. Or carry out lab reviews. It's how many they sell that counts. They have both government approval as a covid test supplier and international reach

So could we see rns and contract not published for a month or so. I'm saying this as a positive

Well yesterday an air freight one was published from December.... you'd imagine Virgin were told of the outcome back then. So only publishing is late. Not suppliers notification.... therefore we could see rns well before the tender outcome details are actually published

Does publishing tender / contract details mean the supplier wasn't told in time. I've seen plenty of late publishing where supplier must have been aware. Therefore could we see an rns even if contract details aren't published

Kevin. I think the point this is a 3 year contract is the main one. This is just one contract in one income stream. Significant as its a first of many cibtractz. I doubt if figures can be assumed as this is new. But also because it would be commercially sensitive. Significant.... not so sure when side by side. Well maybe not in £ terms. But Significant in business terms

Get your point. There are always desperate friendless trolls. Not sure how he missed my bin

Mik. You're becoming childish as well as a complete idiot. Off to green bin