RE: Is SQZ investable19 Feb 2024 19:23
Well said Maverick and would think that a lot of us are thinking the same.
Why on earth have 2 directors bought shares that’s what I want to know? Unless, there are negotiations ongoing about something abroad that we don’t know otherwise it’s a very bad trade chucking money away.
Said it for a long time that NS will be a graveyard under Labour, Aberdeen will be a ghost town and politicians just spouting promises that they can’t keep. When a politician actually wakes up and smells the coffee that they won’t be earning all these billions in tax then everyone will say I told you so but it will be too late by then.
Then you have the eco loons who are determined to stop all o&g production to rely on renewables. Has anyone told them if we switched off o&g today we’d have to import from abroad and we, the taxpayers, would have to pay more for our energy? There is also not enough renewables at the moment and is also not profitable.
Energy is a political pawn in a very bad game and could see thousands of jobs lost but listen to Labour and there will be thousands of jobs in the green sector - oh no they won’t…. Not properly thought through as always.
With no appetite from investors with what’s happening this could easily, very easily, go a whole lot lower. Div maintained - wouldn’t have thought so and that would be the final nail in the coffin.
Just thinking that what Mercuria have actually bought is a company paying 75% (or 78% under Labour). With investment allowances to be deleted they are actually inheriting a dog in a dog industry. It’s going to end up in tears.
I’m holding to see the div then selling