Member Info for Chelsea11

Two clicks and you’re there equals clumsy. Personally, I think not.

Sounds to me TF that you have some Malware on your laptop if you’re getting pop-ups that no one else is. I’d get that looked into urgently if I were you.

Cheers.

TF - first WTP gives clear instructions on one way of getting to the article but you still blame the website functionality. Then Cleaner provides a working link for you (working for everyone else that is). Now you post that same perfectly working link asking for more help?

And I’m the troublesome one!?

PS: Whilst the different web address I posted (came from Marcus) isn’t a hyperlink, its quite elementary to copy and paste should anyone be interested. Am sure folks know how to do that.

WTP - I assume it is this….

www.oncotarget.com/article/13070/text/

Again, a link that works perfectly well.

User error TF.

TF - I’m not sure how pointing out that the link to the article on the website works perfectly well can be classed as troublesome but hey-ho.

Good grief.

How many beers you had TF?

TF.

Go to the website, click on the link in Latest News and the article appears instantly. What other website functionality were you expecting??

Genuinely sorry if you have a family crisis Cleaner but I know if I had one, I wouldn’t be wasting any of my family time poking around on the web, or be at all interested in posting anything here. Regardless, imo it’s fair enough to be calling out a repeat of what someone else has posted just a couple of hours back.

Cleaner - same article WTP posted just a couple of hours back.

You mean C11 and the other 5 (till now) that agree the barrel is being scraped.

Thought I could hear a barrel scraping noise 🥱

It’s all relative.

£40k is petty cash to some!

Surely all todays merriment could have been avoided just by asking AI if it’s going to be a presentation, or a poster only 😂

Rather than me defending the very obvious upgrade in the professionalism of the website, I suggest those who think it is “poor at best”, contact the company to express how disappointed they are with it and that they chose the wrong company to do the work. Particularly anyone who claims to be part of award winning teams.

I’ll leave it there.

Of course you wouldn’t want to upgrade your website to stop yourself from dropping down search engine rankings, improving page loading speed, exploiting social media opportunities and critically, being super mobile friendly in todays digital world etc etc etc. Would you?

Room for improvement yes and as I said previously, there will no doubt be future releases introducing new content / enhancements. However the old site looked like it was built by a student back in the mid-90s. Hardly something to help promote the image of the company when dealing with bio industry heavyweights. L’Huillier obviously agrees.

Thanks WTP. Be careful though. Last time I said how professional the website was becoming and a vast improvement, others here expressed their disagreement and hailed the old one!

Are you stalking me Ruck?

Posted 18th March.

“Last time there was no RNS in a calendar month was Aug 24 and that was the only month last year without seeing one.

Therefore based on that recent history, the odds are favourable for receiving something this month, especially with all the known conference attendance.

Trial timelines have of course been clearly articulated but a fair chance news outside of that will arrive inside the next couple of weeks.”

Great timing for anyone prepared to allocate some / all of their 25/26 ISA allowance here.

Lock and load.