Member Info for Chelsea11

Anyone know the Latin for crap week?

I think it’s difficulty placing a value on the cardboard labs that is holding up the merger discussion

VV - no experience of Nasdaq v. Plenty with the new guy.

Indeed Rats but we shouldn’t always place blind trust in those who should be looking after our best interests.

“Earlier on today, apparently, a woman rang the BBC and said she heard there was a hurricane on the way. Well, if you're watching, don't worry, there isn't!”

Michael Fish - October 1987

HAGW

Perhaps a case of NoEuphoria amongst many here currently 😁

FD - thanks

Digitalis - what do you mean by “no doubt didn’t want to be here”

Consider carefully the wording used in both Company announcements. It is totally non-committal, you could even argue reluctant in nature. I get that they can’t say a lot because they’re at a negotiating table only but there is not one jot of positive spin added by either Company. I don’t mean that disrespectfully to the management of the two companies at all but it raises doubts in my mind as to the true wishes of either of them and whether this is being directed from those with clout. As an aside, I did say previously whether this was being set up purely as a lever to get a deal closed elsewhere. That may prove to be completely wide of the mark and is just pure speculation on my part but it would not surprise me at all.

Suspect that’s because there is no firm agreement in place and no signed documentation. The Scancell RNS was purely a response to press speculation and that wasn’t compulsory. It may happen, or it may not. It did also cross my mind that the whole thing is being used as a lever by the Company to push for an alternative solution.

Some really interesting posts and opinions today stimulated by the news. Some will prove right and some won’t but really healthy debate / discussion and in the main, personal thoughts of individuals here and not those of a dumb scrape from what’s out there on the web. Long may that continue……..

Well I’m in profit there already so got lucky buying after the severe drop and not before. That’s the game we’re all playing I guess.

Interesting Moon.

Noted that the RNS states this (capitals of mine for effect):

“ CONCURRENTLY, Scancell is in discussions regarding possible equity and debt financing to support a planned global Phase 3 registrational study for its lead asset, iSCIB1+”

So in my opinion that could be with anyone.

Sorry I know this is the OMG BB.

Trotsky - IES has dropped over 20% today. I’ve bought it at that level (28p) so hoping I’ve done well there.

As for OMG, expect high 30s / low 40s is now the range until next newsflow.

Nervous? I don’t believe the “regulars” here are nervous. They fully understand the story here, are holding on to their pot of shares and can see past any negativity.

Both begin with S?

Perhaps SCINV works there and is a sign-off

Yeah that’s the conundrum I’ve got. I would have to sell in order to buy into something new. I’ll take a look at IES and thanks for the steer.

Indeed Crusty. All those incomparable links really do is stir up the “well where’s our deal” brigade. Unless the poster can add tangible insight around the relevance to Scancell, the links are pretty meaningless here imo.

Links to M&A activity are regularly posted here and comparison inferred with Scancell. I think you have to be very careful with that and fully understand how comparable and therefore relevant to Scancell those links are. As a for instance, one of the Apogee pipeline is a therapy for Asthma and so it’s not hard to understand that’s a totally different market and potential market size.

Don’t think so Violin. Trinity will be as much in the dark re partnerships / funding / readouts as we are……….for now.