Member Info for Chaebol

And still no TR1. Incredible, very incredible.

'with no regulatory meaning implied' 'The company believes it is compliant and aligning with MiCA protocols'

mmmmmmmmm I think these legal answers give GST and Tim enough rope.

Enki, I chased most of this up mid September, last reply was Tim 30th Sept.

Dear Chaebol

I have just found your message in my ‘junk’ folder. Can I suggest in future that an email address is used that does not have a generic ‘John Smith’ name attached.

Application in progress was meant as a general descriptive term, with no regulatory meaning implied. The company believes it is compliant and aligning with MiCA protocols, but has not yet been granted an MiCA licence. Further updates will be announced as appropriate.

Kind regards

This you ? Enki

Posted in: GST

Posts: 2,481

RE: LLOY buys fintech digital wallet platformToday 12:27

Every one get emailing Shayne and ask about the status as ber the BoL guidance;

"In case more detailed information is necessary for you we would like to advise to contact the legal person itself."

Shayne.tan@gstechnologies.co.uk

'Everyone' Why do you want everyone to email Shayne? but now you're pivoting again........

Enki If Renan has told you that application is submitted why are you requesting other users to email Shayne?

You just don’t know Billy that’s what’s humorous, same as your chaotic take with semnet revenue at 45 million from the sauce (sic) RocketReach's "estimate" of $45m revenue is the kind of wild fantasy number that belongs in a pumpers' group chat, not reality. nothing like that inflated RocketReach fairy tale. DYOR indeed... As for the share count and "not acting in concert" with the missus – classic. Nothing funnier than a big stake boasted without the mandatory TR-1 disclosure when thresholds get crossed, yet somehow the spouse's holdings are totally unrelated and don't need aggregating. Immaculate separation, that. The FCA must love those technicalities.

Keep swinging, Billy – it's pure entertainment.

WHAT WERE THE SEVERAL PROCESSES I MISSED OUT FROM MICA TO CREATE FUD BILLY.

Really

Simple question I’m asking you but you keep pivoting ?

Without going to slurs billy boy Lets hear your so called intelligence in the several processes I have missed out on MiCA?

This will be funny..... Go......

Are you some kind of idiot, we have a whole board of people that are slating this BOD for no news. I have emailed posted on every linkedin post and this BOD just remains crickets.

Have you ever tried to email Tone Goh or call him, why even advertise numbers and emails that dont answer ? I have Tim replying sporadically, Tan replying on Linkedin with nonsense and the Lord was keen at first but now time is showing him up as well.

Billy the BOD doesnt answer do they.

Which several processes did i miss educate us all billy

The bod is non responsive so whats the point?

Yes Billy 1 company has been approved in Lithuania so its far more complicated and less of a formality than many of the rampers think here. I'm wondering what would be so diffcult for the BOD to announce theyve applied pending approval? Even the BOL have intimated we can ask the legal entity this.

But app in progress not being taken seriously by me until we have some form of proof its been applied for.

Tan and the BOD do not reply to people. Barring the Lord, who replied to a few of us and spouted 7 weeks ago podcasts/interviews but then their pesky AGM got in the way but still nothing from that!

Im not wasting any more time trying to get a reply from a non responsive BOD tbh.

Ask him if its passed the completeness review. And is Application submitted pending approval/authorization. He will not commit to that!

'Our team is in continuous communication with the regulatory authority overseeing the MiCA framework and has been diligently working to meet all necessary requirements'.

If you have completed the completeness review which is around 30-40 days then you wouldnt be diligently working to meet all the requirements. They would have been met! From what I read the requirements are still being diligently worked on as is the application.

Lol Stranger things have happened Dags. Mara will own 1.1 GW by the end of the year. Will put them back in the mix I reckon I hope lol

Rank

Company

Energized/Operational MW

Notes / Primary Locations

1

CleanSpark (CLSK)

~1,030 MW

Mostly US (Georgia, Mississippi, Wyoming, Tennessee); ~808 MW utilized for mining as of Oct 2025, with full portfolio energized at 1.03 GW

2

Hut 8 (HUT)

~1,020 MW

US & Canada; includes self-mining, hosting, and managed sites (e.g., Alpha, Salt Creek, Vega, King Mountain)

3

Iris Energy (IREN)

~810–850 MW

US (Texas) & Canada; 100% renewable-powered, rapid expansions at Childress and other sites

4

Riot Platforms (RIOT)

~700–800 MW

Primarily Texas (Rockdale ~700 MW + Corsicana Phase 1 400 MW energized, though partially pivoting remaining capacity to AI/HPC)

5

Marathon Digital (MARA)

~650–750 MW

US (Texas, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio); on track toward 1.1 GW target by year-end

6

Cipher Mining (CIFR)

~450–600 MW

US (Texas); includes full 300 MW Black Pearl + other sites

7

Core Scientific (CORZ)

~500–600 MW (mixed use)

US; significant portion now contracted for AI/HPC hosting (e.g., CoreWeave deals) rather than pure Bitcoin mining

8

Bitfarms (BITF)

~460–675 MW

US & Canada; post-Stronghold acquisition and Paraguay divestment, focused on North America

But I thought the rampers were told last week or the week before by the Bake $10 an hour live support agent that the MiCA application had been submitted x;)

IF this was MiCA any day now truly ! we would have leaks, buyers and interest, not this continuous downward momentum and no volume !

And round and round we go, all the BOD need to say is 'Application submitted pending approval'. But none of them will commit to that.

Curve Europe UAB (company code 305626541) was incorporated and founded on September 18, 2020, in Vilnius, Lithuania. This date marks the official registration in the Lithuanian Register of Legal Entities, which serves as both the incorporation and founding date for UAB companies. Multiple official and business databases confirm this: Rekvizitai.lt (Lithuanian company directory) states: "Curve Europe, UAB (code 305626541) was founded in 2020-09-18."

EMIS company profile: "The company was established on September 18, 2020."

The entity was set up as a subsidiary of the UK-based Curve OS Limited, primarily in anticipation of Brexit to maintain EEA operations. It later obtained an electronic money institution (EMI) license from the Bank of Lithuania (around late 2020/early 2021), but the company itself existed from the September 2020 registration date.

Curve came a long way in 5 years, especially compared to GS Fintech UAB makes me wonder why GS Fintech didnt apply for the EMI when it looked fast and loose in the early days in Lithuania. GS fintech holds a virtual currency exchange and wallet operator registration with the Bank of Lithuania (not a full EMI license), obtained after incorporation.

Thanks JP. So still around 36 mill USD worth to WCAP.

Are the redeemable Weshop points also a factor in the confusion and punters being spooked today ? thats another 12.5 million shares from memory.