RE: NCCL and the numbers14 Aug 2020 15:58
Some good discussion here.
For what little it's worth, am for now mainly interested in the derisking of the project as the means to increasing value for shareholders (i.e. a rising SP).
The recent delay will have created concerns. However, with and following NCCL transmission study news, we picked up a lot of other info, including from that Proactive interview with Hanno, and around the government initiated tendering processes underpinned by our work. Indeed, we learned about the connected substation, and the tendering process that has likely already started there too. The combination of all of these raised confidence levels enormously. Am extremely confident, as a result.
Is worth also adding that while we wait to achieve those upcoming milestones, the work for which has largely been done, the risk situation as being viewed by us is very different to what CMEC can see from where they are (given their obvious embedded involvement):
Why?
- The Ncondezi Power Project has gone Government-to-Government (Moz-to Beijing, where there was a signing ceremony for the binding JDA), and is now part of the China’s Belt and Road Initiative
- Tendering processes now being initiated (see recent NCCL Tweet), in readiness, with all other projects (i.e. Competition) having fallen away; and the infrastructure now gathering in the area our project will be.
- Every one of the biggest possible actors in this field are involved: from the Mozambican Government to the Chinese; from CMEC to GE; from AFC to Polenergia. As soon as SHA TS lands, we move absolutely to the next level.
I also think that NCCL have a more positively entangled relationship with CMEC than we realise.
Good luck all!