RE: Does not wording of COP26.....18 Nov 2021 08:31
The problem here is, is that the company cannot say anythin the definitive, until they are in a position to RNS. All of it is 'hopefully' etc, because that is officially where everything is (reflected in the SP/ Market Cap).
However, to me, this is not a binary bet. Moz needs its coal being used and needs the power that will be generated. China needs the cokign coal, and now, it seems, with all the outages, it coudl also do with the thermal coal. It also won't want to back away from a 300MW project, one that is Scalable to 1200MW (as per Moz Goverment key power/ energy documents).
Why would China walk away from this?!
They have just pushed for the wording on coal at COP26 to be changed, from 'Phasing out...' to 'Phasing down...' --- why would they do that if they weren't going to act upon it?!
Let's remember, CMEC (essentially, in representing the Chinese State), has just signed the EPC, in the process saying they were '...committed to working with NCCL to deliver the project in the near future'. How would that be possible if this project hung in the balance?
The biggest problems here is a) we are't in control (to be expected, and is unfortunately part of the jouney for many companies on AIM); and b) poor treatment of shareholders by the company.
But this doesn't mean we are binary bet. China will come good. If they don't fund the project, they likely won't others, when they need the coal (they are badly short of both coaking and thermal coal), and there's easy money to be made out of the power project. They have possibly just surpassed the US as the richest nation on the planet. They will be looking to maintain their position and their prospects. They won't be doing that by turning down projects like ours.