Member Info for Cevodniya

ML, with you all the way mate.

Chid, excellent explanation of a rights issue, but it's lose, not loose.

Lose is to lose something

Loose is the opposite of tight.

Timmy. You'll never make money, it takes you too long to make a decision and you have too many what if's.

You still haven't answered why the US tax payer should protect Europeans.

Pan I've been where you are, but the short termism baffles me .

You've no idea what the price will be Monday morning.

I'm up £3.5 million this week alone, not bragging or being condescending, but my advice is the MRE will be enormous.

Control your impatience.

I'm holding over 13.5 Empire so the gains are enormous but the losses hurt even more.

I wouldn't dream of trying to day trade this.

Rooters, congratulations

Pan, I can't imagine what it must like to hold a share for a week, including the weekend, wow

Artic, very, very nice

Artic, there's always one eh?

MK/AIM, I agree with both your points, however a few things to consider.

With all the media attention this will be volatile and day traders will pile in and volumes will go up and they'll sell.

However, investors with deeper pockets, more patience and more fundamental analysis will replace them.

Re length of investment and SP, I never set targets and sell when achieved.

Why?.Because, I constantly fundamentally analyse.

Why sell if a huge increase in revenue us imminent.

An example, I bought a shedload of Rolls-Royce at 70p they are now nearly £11 and whist I've sold some, I've jept a load because the fundamentals keep getting better.

Roger, really, you think it's misleading and rather crude.

Since Nato was formed the European countries have freeloaded off the US.

This century, Germany has made 3 massive geopolitical and economic blunders.

1/ To place it's energy security on Russia

2/ To place it's defence security on the US

3/ To place it's economic security on Chinese consumers

Fortunately, it appears that they realise all 3 Merkel blunders.

Also, the Europeans have been strong armed into more adequate defence spending.

Simple as.

Timmy Europeans have been freeloading on Nato spending for decades.

Nato countries have agreed to spend 2% of GDP on defence.

Spain spends just over 1%.

Can you explain in your own words why the US taxpayer should provide military support and protection for a European continent, that has a greater population and a greater GDP.

Go ahead Timmy, in your own words be a 21st century geopolitician.

1.96.33% is the answer

Timmy, I'm not interested in how in the slightest.

You were aware of this when it was around 12p and did nothing.

Why?

Because quite simply as I've said before, your neurological thought processing precludes you from making a decision, until it's too late.

Simple as.

If Zak is such a genius, back his next tip, but you won't.

Gainwith jane, absolutely no influence at all.

If you want to know my percentage, simply work out 13,554556 as a % of the issued share capital.

But why you'd want to know is fascinating.

No Internet

Stargate, and tonight's lottery winning numbers are?

Do you actually believe your rubbish?

A Haitian witch doctor has more credibility.

Timmy, you truly are a child of the Internet, aren't you.

Groupies like you simply provide the oxygen fot self claimed prophets like Zak.

Imagine an investment world with Internet, no utube, no forums.

How do you think people invested?

Because we did and we made money.

No on line trading apps like HL ir trading212.

No discussion groups.

Try and learn to think for yourself instead of having to be constantly fed.

my ignorance, no wonder our little island is in the ****, when ignorance is celebrated.

Trello, guys loke you amaze me.

You write like a pseudo intellectual giant, aware of macro/micro economics, geopolitics, defence issues.

Yet, grammatically you are at the level of an 8r old.

Sparky, YOUR absolutely on the money.

Really?

You must know, your is a possessive noun i.e your house, your family.

You are is a declension of the verb to be.

So, it's I am, you are.

It's not difficult is it?

Mini, there are a lot of cautious investors who won't commit until factual information is realised.

So, the speculators and day traders who buy on rumours and sell on fact, could be replaced by buyers, who buy on facts.

So either scenario could occur.

But if you are a LTH does it really matter?

It will havexa much higher base.