Member Info for Cephalo

‘I will be back on the 1st of October to gloat!! :)‘
Back 25th August 3 hours 40 minutes later. Moron

That's the operative word - "an"other post. That's "1" post compared to about 100 posts containing faecal grade chat from Sh**!! Work that husk you call a head to count precisely how many - I know you have nothing better to do :-)

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/jul/25/outrage-as-italy-faces-multimillion-pound-damages-to-uk-oil-firm
Was it you PS who made this point several times?
Anyway, wokery won't last for ever.
Those companies holding exploration licences and developers, have licences which are agreed by law. Governments will be sued to bankruptcy if common sense doesn't prevail. The tax payer would foot the bill for all the exploration and production and renewable energy on current contracts, whereas, if they don't get sued, the tax payer will get the benefit of investment from outside; companies which will then turn profit into sustainable renewable investments. Otherwise where is that money going to come from for renewables?

They have to review how to pitch the financing in the context of climate change to attract investors who are no longer looking at just an investment in oil or gas, but towards sustainability. I think this is why Ann-Marie O’Sullivan is probably on board, as the project will require the right kind of PR strategy to cut through the lies about green energy, and make it authentic as well as palatable. "She is founder and Chief Executive of AM O’Sullivan PR Ltd, a leading strategic communications consultancy headquartered in Cork, the nearest city to the Barryroe oil and gas field".

Interesting censorship of non-green articles it seems - the link to the article you quoted has now broken. Also PS200's post last night at 23.28 about the Allam cycle has gone.

No Shen, we missed nothing. We also observed that you cannot stay away from here because it's your only chance to communicate with people well above your pay grade and intellect. Seems a shame you can't court attention in the real world, but for you that's the thrill here. By the way, you won't be getting the pleasure of any more responses from me. You are my inferior, and I don't stoop.

While I would enjoy punching you, rest easy - I will not be attending the AGM. Besides I don't use violence unless attacked. However, get you in the boxing ring if you fancy doing 3 rounds one day.

So what's your real name Shen so we know who to punch at the AGM?

That's your idea of fun - spending Friday all night posting here. Waster!

Have cake and eat it. The greens don't want to produce energy but they are quite happy it seems to burn tonnes of it in data centres to provide revenue from the internet giants who depend on them. The young think they care about the environment but spend all day on social media accessing those same companies who rely on the data centres, and that same young user base is their target audience. It truly amazed me that those who actually care about the environment do not prioritise plastics pollution over and above actual carbon footprint. But again, those young idealists expect the adults to clear up their plastic packaging mess in the parks after parties and festivals. Another problem with the woke young, is they love their holidays and sabbaticals which relies on air travel and the burning of fossil fuels. And finally, the deluded think crypto currency is going to change the world. Well that game of musical chairs burns more electric power than the data centres. Professional traders and criminals will do well out of it, and leave those still playing when the music stops, high and dry. When September comes, and the young of the UK can't find a job for love nor money, I wonder how long this idealistic woke clap trap will last when they find that, like everyone, they are competing with those who have colonized these islands in the last 20 years who are riding rough shod.

Thanks Manyana, the trouble is with the constant repeated clap trap is that it puts off kinder souls who would like to post. The cretin is supported by several brain donors and most don't want to be at the receiving end of their nastiness. I can't stand thugs and for sure by now one or two here would have received bloodied noses in a face to face situation if they had dared to speak as they write. The trouble with the cretin is, the brain donations are of very low grade, so there's no proper signs of life, which is why it parrots the same garbage day in day out. We all know the pros and cons of the share without the so called warnings from the mob leader.

Excuse my math, every shareholder to get them would make it highly dilutive but not exponentially so.

Bulls, sure we would all like those options, but sadly that would mean an exponential % dilution. Instead of a billion shares, it would be number of options x 1 billion. For every shareholder to get them. The best we would ever get is a rights issue discounted placing. Again, more dilution.

So much negative spam here from the usual liars on this board, who claim to know future outcomes, speaking with the 'authority' of insiders. Good or bad as you may view this share to be, you can't tar Alan with the same brush as the previous management ranger4. There's no evidence at all to suggest that he is inept. Sure there are more shares in issue, but new buyers can buy the same percentage of the company at a far lower price and enjoy any upside. Anyone who wanted to remain in after having bought £6 shares will probably have a far lower average by now. £1000 will buy you 30000 odd shares now whereas before it would buy you 167 shares. You still own the same percentage of the company

Well, that's all very well. Didn't mean to get personal but why would you be so upset with the inclusion of this in a pension fund? Unless you were shorting and have an altruistic reason for avoiding fossil fuel investments? Or are getting annoyed with good news in case it benefits investors. I have to point out how miniscule the inclusion of PVR at £3million worth of stock. Look at the rest of their portfolio...vast. If they lost the lot with PVR the fund would barely blink. Yet, if it returned multiples of it's current price, it would make an impact on their pension value. A responsible spread of investments in the energy sector including oil and gas, is very much in the interests of holders.

Well obviously you have a vested interest in wanting to see PVR fail. He can always opt out of such investments. Pardon for saying, but going to the mayor's office???!!! You go to the financial advisor. Given your apparent lack of knowledge on spudding and finance, it figures.

Bronx, you can invest in whatever you choose in a pension. The options across the risk spectrum are open.
Yes I know about Atlantic. Did you know about the spudding of all the wells and the flow rates?? Worth a read, I enjoyed reading extensively.

They can invest in whatever they choose, at whatever level of desired risk. It probably constitutes a fraction of their holdings and therefore cause considerable upside compared to downside in the event of growth. Barryroe will be an important part in the power mix when transitioning to renewables from different sources. Revenues from oil and gas will support infrastructure and jobs in renewables while gradually being phased lower. If PVR get the strategy right, it could over time end up being better than investing in currently overhyped over valued rare earth metals and other green energy plays.

That's a significant holding for a pension fund.

I think he got greedy and thought he could drag it out then buy out PVR (Reverse takeover PVR speculation ring any bells?) when they ran out of options. Alan should have backed himself more at the start, but the oil price was low, and the traditional farm out (give away half the company) was assumed to be par for the course. SO we're in breach of contract, then given 6 weeks grace, but due to their own greed and subsequent complacency, blew it. As mentioned in PS.'s post they got cheap shares that none of us were offered, so have received fair remuneration for the work. It's of great concern that one man almost acquired half of logp and PVR for setting up a deal, and luckily for us then, that he failed to raise the cash. The deal made when it was half what the oil price was a scandal for shareholders in hindsight.