Member Info for Celtic007

The one good aspect of change of direction is that a big pharma has asked for more data as liked the initial days, but want long term safety known.

i am more confident after the last debacle but really want to see us motoring on with this toxicology trial. i am confused as to how we quickly got the trial started in oz so quickly after mhra **** ups. why is it taking so long ? the money is there and not a issue. hopefully soon we will hear

Luvlyjubbly

Really Roberto lol. .tool

Cuppy, you sound like Roberto twin here, half the time. Get a grip

Thanks sog. Appreciated. Hopefully looking good. Let's get told toxicity done please!!!!!!

Could zccax be Roberto in disguise 🥸?

Ok riceboy, so you playing this up and down as you admit. That's fine, but no need to be naughty like you are being at the moment. I am not going to go the lowest denominator like I have before, as not worth it.

Do we think today was people topping up in ISA or something afoot ? When is peer research review happening? Thanks

Hi sadoldgit. After last week's news on new breast cancer drug therapy showing amazing data, will that make our chk1 attract more attention? Ta

Yep, watching it as well. Hopefully sareum can bring the boat back to the shore safely .

Thanks hotblack. Yes,as I said am here till the end. Was annoyed then but am reassured. Would like the PR increased and these toxicology tests done.

Hopefully also CHK back and hopefully passed on as a combo or triple, as always the data looked amazing.

And hopefully our first drug soloubilty issues can get resolved....so we have four drugs now ,not three . Our first drug was the reason I bought these initially and had amazing mouse data regarding tumour suppression .

Thanks hotblack for that link. Looks very good so far and if that is replicated in long term toxicology data them should be good.

Meg, not worth taking the bait. Ignore is best. Use your energy to post relevent information, negative or positive constructively with evidence. Thanks

Roberto you really one sad bastard. Your mum dad must be embarrassed to be associated with you.

Interesting thanks. Well I hope sareum are up to date regarding everything that it has been used in, to complete the jigsaw

This could be due to the stronger selectivity of SRA737 for CHK1 compared to prexasertib (1,000-fold greater selectivity)"

This stood out, great find. Surely any company using this for research of any sorts needs now sareum permission? Chk1 I find a mystery , as drug looks amazing , it's the momentum to take it forward

Shut the f up Roberto....fool

Thanks krone appreciated. Important step.

Sorry could someone explain the importance of IND for our chk1 drug?.

You look like you are Roberto mother or sis ...similar posting manner...twat