RE: Presentation1 Jul 2022 18:41
Daltry, I am no supporter of the current Board of Directors, but it does look like Crystal Amber seem to be tolerating them and voted at the AGM to keep Marris in place - surely that speaks volumes and tells a story.
Also, rightly or wrongly, you Haggis and others want this "plan" - but surely not even a competent Board of Directors would or could issue any sort of plan whislt the Engery Profits Levi Bill is, or was, still only a draft document and still under consultation till earlier this week. This Legislation is a game changer to how any plan is financed and by whom - I suspect that this legislation changes everything and RB and the BoD know that. - Particularly regarding the Investment Incentive where Oil and Gas companies can immediately offset Capital Investment expenditure as well as some Leasing and Operating costs. Further more the fact that unlike Tax Losses, this does not need to be activated against relevant income and can be used to create or augment a Levy Loss - this surely means that the Mid Tear and Major Oil Companies would rather invest than pay the Levi to the Government. The fact that finance costs and decommissioning costs cannot be offset under this new legislation can only be in Hurricanes favour.
I am sure that the clever legal people in all the large energy companies will now be doing the sums to ensure they give away as little as possible under the new Bill - clarification will be needed on how much acquiring a small Company like Hurricane could be offset given that they have already been granted the ring fenced allowances - but certainly 80% of any further costs to upgrade the FPSO, drill, tieback to the Wasp (or whatever other Gas Solution they decide on) could be immediately used to reduce any suitors current Levy Tax bill - and then can Hurricanes ring fenced tax losses offset production on not only Lancaster but also any other of the suitors producing assets ????