Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
I can see that your feline 'other self' on the other channel is running exactly the same point with exactly the same terminology at almost exactly the same time.
You are saying nothing that the company is not saying other than you're once again making stupid comments, repeating stupid terminology I don't believe you understand.
You don't and can't know that.
The company acknowledges the need to raise capital, as most companies at a similar stage of development will, and has stated that it will do so taking into account the least dilutive option for shareholders.
In the meantime, it is quite feasible that it may receive an offer to purchase or farm out.
End of.
No amount of negative speculation, lies, obfuscation and unsubstantiated one-liners from you and your cohort (if there is a cohort and not simply one person with multiple aliases) is going to change that.
Having checked out Oilman Jim's latest posts on Twitter, I found that, today, he was bragging about the fact that Scots posts, both yesterday and today, had been removed from the LSE site.
I suggested that there was an issue with his unsubstantiated one-liners and that a queue was waiting to step into Scot's shoes.
You'll never guess what happened next...............
...........I've been banned from from seeing or following (not that i was ever going to 'follow' him ) Oilman Jim's posts.
Funny that!
13.20
Pray tell us.
Explain the words in brackets in point 2. if you can.
You see these are points clearly raised by others whom you quote verbatim without the foggiest idea what they mean.
12.11
You are an expert in flow tests and the parameters for financing I presume? The company has stated that it is already in discussion with potential financiers, irrespective of your view on flow tests. We've had this debate previously and you didn't answer - I recall you went to lunch!
What is your area of expertise as a matter of interest? No need for a full CV, just a clue.
6 Nov 18.23
An extract taken completely out of context to arrive at a summary to attempt to support a warped narrative. Read some of the rest which starts by putting into context the flow test reference.
"the flow rates themselves were not expected to be material because the objective was to limit drawdown in the initial flow back. However, the actual flow rates were substantially better than prognosed, given the conservative approach to production in order to limit gas flashing in the reservoir and ensure the best quality PVT samples, which bodes well for future SMD development in the Ahpun Field."
and,
"Future wells will provide the opportunity for further optimization with a view to meeting benchmarks of 80% frac efficiency achieved in other basins.
and finally,
"Following this validation of the ability to improve the frac efficiency by more than 2x compared to the Alkaid-2 long term test, the Company's strategy to move to regulatory approvals for the Ahpun Field development and to proceed with a hot tap into the TAPS main oil line has been reinforced. Confirming producible oil in the SMD, the larger oil accumulation within the Ahpun Field (which includes the Alkaid ZOI) is significant for the longer-term commercial implications of developing production infrastructure near the Dalton Highway."
10.14
Another ridiculous statement, particularly bearing in mind that the result was only published today.
Please explain why it is not good news for PANR..........or have you gone for a much earlier lunch today?
17.48
Still not back from lunch to answer the detailed points out to him and desperate to change the direction of the narrative.
Flow test already answered - twice.
Industry partner - another new parameter having lost many battles on many others - all really connected to the first point.
Explain, in plain English why a positive result for 88e would be an embarrassment! This is a throw away line you're attempting to move into the public perception without any sensible or justifiable reason. Explain!
More bull.
Good luck to 88e with the results of the NSAI for Hickory-1.
If they are successful, then we both have a great resource! Not forgetting, of course than PANR can also go for many miles in a north and north westerly direction, updip with lower DMAX, resulting in better porosity and permeability with , likely beneficial rates of extraction.
Looks like a great win-win-win, were it to be confirmed for 88e. Perhaps we could then have a grown up conversation about sharing costs of delivery to market.
It is abundantly clear that hiding behind the metaphorical green settee until the bogeyman goes away has not resolved the problem.
Some of us try to challenge the bases of the stance of others with objective arguments.
The latter is my clear preference.
Each to their own.
Louis,
You appear to think that this whole share investment mullarky is some kind of game in which people can be duped into buying shares.
It never was and remains so.
This is a game, if 'game' is the right word, for risk takers of all persuasions. The risks are clear, the warnings are there for all, whether you're investing in government bonds, a money purchase pension or highly risky AIM explorer stocks - the value of your investment could go up or down.
It is a game for adults whereas you try to paint a picture that, people have been duped, believing in some childlike way that money has been stolen by fraudsters - almost like lollipops having been stolen from children in the playground. There was a time on all of these boards when the final statement following comments and commentaries was "DYOR" - Do Your Own Research. Great advice. Along with, "don't invest more than you can afford to lose". Both have always been truisms.
You appear to attempt to label those who make statements of faith as the miscreants, rampers, whereas you take no heed of those shorters who lost other shareholders millions in the values of their investments. You need to get real. I've been caught on a price spike more than once - more fool me!!! it was my adult decision not to sell or not to re-purchase at the right time. I don't go around blaming others. My decision. More fool me!
I suspect that you've been caught out and lost money or that you're now on some Robin Hood-like mission to correct what you see as people being wronged.
Get real!
Go back and fully review the posts made throughout the rise in value of the share to 140+ and its subsequent fall from grace. If you do a full and thorough analysis you'll find that your arguments do not hold water. To blame a small number of people for this, is utter nonsense.
You appear to hold Jim out as some messianic figure who called it right all the way along. You need to re-read his contributions and all of those you appear to consider as miscreants. I fear that you'll find that ol' Jimmy Boy is pulling your digit.
A real pity you chose not to engage today, after 'lunch'.
I probably look a bit of a plonker for trying to engage with you in good faith, but I can live with that.
cb
19.51
C'mon, let's pick up where we left off at 12.18.
You had a lunch appointment, if you recall, and we were going to continue our dialogue later.
Let's go!
You wouldn't want the other punters here thinking you were just looking for an easy OUT.....surely?
17.55
Back with a bumptious post-lunch bang.
"why does PANR attract shorts?" - All ears, tell us.
I hope you haven't dumped me after that pre-lunch positive dialogue.
A lot of people around here probably think I'm nuts for even trying to enter into dialogue with you and who can blame them. Prove them wrong and answer my earlier points or........well I've got broad shoulders and I'll just take it. God loves a tryer, or so they say. 🙄