Member Info for cbaron

16.51

"read the rns, dorks. Its like dermapers kindergarten here." ????

16.39

Then tell us what you think it means, if your opinion differs, by reference to the document.

Should read :

As at 29 September the interests.......

16.20

That's utter nonsense. As at he interests within the control of Michael Spencer have increased their holding from 4.99% to 5.82% of the issued share capital of PANR. The total holding is 53.5 million shares.

That represents considerable and increasing support for the company from a man with control of companies whose asset value exceed £1billion. Look it all up at Companies House.

14.22

Sorry to butt in, but perhaps you would show us your calculations and reasoning as to why "The actual economics is where it all starts to fall down"?

That's a grand statement - no glib one liner answers that don't actually provide an answer, no going off to hide because it's a difficult question - show us. Estimated production, value per barrel, costs of production, cost of delivery to market. Stick some guesstimates in there if you feel the need, make some assumptions on value and cost variances over time, cost of finance, delivery timetable, etc, etc. You must have a view backed up by data otherwise you shouldn't be making the statement that, "The actual economics is where it all starts to fall down".

Answer sensibly and you never know, people might start to treat you in a different way.

Be smart/glib , fail to answer or turn the question around and I'm afraid your reputation will remain intact.

Sprout45,

Thank you for your post.

I agree with you about the prospects of the company. I tend to pour over the details, the finance and what the company produces rather than a day-to-day SP narrative. We are in a far better position now than we were over a year ago when the SP peaked, yet it's amazing what a couple of own goals and a shorting concert party can do for confidence. I fully believe in the company fundamentals and they have changed for the better with the reports and the new 'chimney' acreages; a little short term asset value reduction is nothing to lose sleep over (though £1.50 > £0.10 was a bit steep!). Believe me, I'm happy - if only you could see the smirk when writing some of this stuff 😂 - never confuse a difference of agreement with being miserable. It is just that - a difference and really not anything to concerns oneself about.

The difficulty here is that many can only think and write in single syllables and when the argument goes beyond them they switch people off. Happy to listen to anyone and everyone.

You be happy too.

Best wishes

cbaron

13.53

For the record, I didn't say that Sprout should be absent, I merely disagree with the type and style and of some of his posts.

If I wanted to, I could do as others do and block him from view and, as far as I'm concerned, he has done nothing to warrant being banned from the board by its administrators.

You, on the other hand.................?

It's not a matter of needing an apology, it is the meaningless nature of the post in the first place. If everyone posted their opinion and commentary on share price trends several times a day, what would the board look like?

13.23

;-)

Sprout,

You unilaterally decide not to post and decide to tell us all - utterly riveting and such a meaningful contribution.

You then change your mind - equally as riveting and equally as meaningful.

Neither contribution makes any technical comment on the company, its management, structure, prospects, outlook, development timetable................etc, etc

You have the effrontery to suggest that others talk drivel.

You then tell us you think the SP will increase today.

I rest my case.

"I’m also so happy today to see less or none of the usual drivel on the board."

That was certainly the case Sprout, but all went awry at 12.39.

07.58

There's a an old myth that back in geological time a ship carrying pound notes was wrecked above the shelf margin. It is believed that the pound notes were deposited in the SMD. Whilst not appearing in any RNS to date, this is the true target and will add huge value to the current PANR exercise, if found.

Top up quick! 🤣🤣🤣

20.13

Icecube,

Butt out, I wasn't talking to you.

How many times do you need to try to make the same point - we heard you.

20.39

Simply a piece of advice from someone with a little more common sense. Up to you! I don't really care, other than that listening to your reports is both tedious, tiresome and not a little arrogant.

One 'r' by the way.

18.22

James,

' In future I will not disclose my holding....'

That seems like a sensible course of action. Might I add that you could consider not telling the world when you buy or sell and how much you buy or sell as there will always be someone who misinterprets your motives, howsoever well intended.

9.53

Boring! Oh and check your watch.

14.11

;-)

'I'm happy'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbZSe6N_BXs

14.06

...and your contributions add what exactly other than statements of the bleedin' obvious and a dumb commentary on information the rest of us are all too aware of?

Earlier you said, "I have finished my posts for today unless we go over. 30p." If only you'd stuck to your guns!

Not very bright, eh?

I'm delighted when the share goes up, not so when it goes down and least of all when reading your meaningless contributions. Sprouts have a habit of causing wind and you appear to fit the bill perfectly.

13.49

...pray tell?! Might we expect an in depth psychological thesis?

And so, it's not turning then?! At least not in the direction the constant purveyors of infantile diatribe would have us believe.