Member Info for cbaron

A very interesting one from left field, or right field - whichever way round you've got your globe.

Clearly, there will be a need for funding this and the existing Alaskan commitments - aren't there always, but if the eventual returns are there and the shareholders are not going to be fleeced, as they have in the past, then it seems like a low cost of entry for potentially significant reward. The balance of financial commitment across the four organisations appears credible and means that 88e are bearing the total risk burden.

There will always be the negative naysayers, and I'm sure there's more devil in the detail to come, but you've always got to speculate to accumulate.

Go across and have a look.

Quite illuminating.

21.00

Louis sounding desperate.

23.18

i'm enjoying the other place at the moment. your (cat33) cohort are typically high on bull**** and insult and rarely can put together a cogent argument. they are great on unsubstantiated one-liners - exactly like you over here.

now revelling in the prospect of shareholders losing money - looks to me like you've overstepped the mark.

17.57

Interesting choice of words;

"I shall continue to contribute whether of not the cohort of touts like it."

Contribute: Meaning 'to give something, especially money, in order to provide or achieve something together with other people'. (Cambridge Dictionary)

What do you consider you are doing which complies with the definition?

You see, sometimes you appear eloquent and at other times not, sometimes you get it right (English and Grammar, not content) and many times not.

Sometimes you appear on a high and at other times you simply disappear.

Are you OK?

Are you being exploited?

'Who are the cohort of touts'

Are you being mislead?

You're life appears really miserable - it must be if this is all you do, merely being a "dispassionate observer".

I think you need help.

18.05

Not many people talk of 'reserves' and funnily enough both you and the cat man on the other side have referenced them in the last few hours. Do you even know what the terms means?

Have you suddenly become an accountant or banker with references to 'security for a lender'? Do you know what that means?

No, security does not mean that you go straight to a placing or convertible debt. If you continue with your Googling you mind find there are many other options too.

Happy learning!

12.04

No Louis, you appear to have been here for much of the morning. Now, the school bell will ring any time and so off you go for lunch.

The company acknowledges the need to raise finance in a self development scenario - it does not need to resort to the cash methods you propose.

It may not need finance at all!

Mowmoo,

That's a good extract to emphasise. Extrapolate the results to the full pay interval and we're looking at the potential for a 40x multiple of the 80-100 BOPD with additional and commensurate improvements on frac length.

Mind blowing!

11.20

You say "he always ends up wrong".

Give us examples.

I can see that your feline 'other self' on the other channel is running exactly the same point with exactly the same terminology at almost exactly the same time.

You are saying nothing that the company is not saying other than you're once again making stupid comments, repeating stupid terminology I don't believe you understand.

You don't and can't know that.

The company acknowledges the need to raise capital, as most companies at a similar stage of development will, and has stated that it will do so taking into account the least dilutive option for shareholders.

In the meantime, it is quite feasible that it may receive an offer to purchase or farm out.

End of.

No amount of negative speculation, lies, obfuscation and unsubstantiated one-liners from you and your cohort (if there is a cohort and not simply one person with multiple aliases) is going to change that.

17.20

Not on the ice nor reliant on the ice and certainly will not be under 6 feet of ice. It's a gravel pad next to the Dalton Highway you f'wit.

20.30

Could you please explain these thoroughly subjective assessments please?

Having checked out Oilman Jim's latest posts on Twitter, I found that, today, he was bragging about the fact that Scots posts, both yesterday and today, had been removed from the LSE site.

I suggested that there was an issue with his unsubstantiated one-liners and that a queue was waiting to step into Scot's shoes.

You'll never guess what happened next...............

...........I've been banned from from seeing or following (not that i was ever going to 'follow' him ) Oilman Jim's posts.

Funny that!

13.20

Pray tell us.

Explain the words in brackets in point 2. if you can.

You see these are points clearly raised by others whom you quote verbatim without the foggiest idea what they mean.

12.45

An no answers to the points I raised at 12.11? No surprises!

12.45

Another lie, given none of your posts were directed at me or to the questions I raised earlier that day.

12.11

You are an expert in flow tests and the parameters for financing I presume? The company has stated that it is already in discussion with potential financiers, irrespective of your view on flow tests. We've had this debate previously and you didn't answer - I recall you went to lunch!

What is your area of expertise as a matter of interest? No need for a full CV, just a clue.

6 Nov 18.23

An extract taken completely out of context to arrive at a summary to attempt to support a warped narrative. Read some of the rest which starts by putting into context the flow test reference.

"the flow rates themselves were not expected to be material because the objective was to limit drawdown in the initial flow back. However, the actual flow rates were substantially better than prognosed, given the conservative approach to production in order to limit gas flashing in the reservoir and ensure the best quality PVT samples, which bodes well for future SMD development in the Ahpun Field."

and,

"Future wells will provide the opportunity for further optimization with a view to meeting benchmarks of 80% frac efficiency achieved in other basins.

and finally,

"Following this validation of the ability to improve the frac efficiency by more than 2x compared to the Alkaid-2 long term test, the Company's strategy to move to regulatory approvals for the Ahpun Field development and to proceed with a hot tap into the TAPS main oil line has been reinforced. Confirming producible oil in the SMD, the larger oil accumulation within the Ahpun Field (which includes the Alkaid ZOI) is significant for the longer-term commercial implications of developing production infrastructure near the Dalton Highway."