Member Info for CaptainSwag

Bandit...I am not so sure. They must know sh are xxxxed off and losing patience with the clown.

Offering north of a pound..could get majority of retail on board

Atan - i think it was more of a case of him trying to justify sp wich is drifting down / trying to negate any critical posts / trying a very low level ramp - all that is left.

still makes a change from quoting the quare fellow over on advfn

got stop watch on - waiting for my stalker

Last time round - sidara made i think 4 bids - there was a 35p increase from first to last

they will of course start with a low ball offer - natural in business

and then increase as necessary.

they expect to pay less than previously offered but at the same time will be realistic otherwise they would not approach again.

i do wonder if they get knocked back again - if they will go hostile?

Kate Calder from Edinburgh area trolling again.

Lies to try and provoke an argument as she is lonely again

Stalking me on other boards again- note she knows where I am posting

Funny how you have nothing to say unless me or atan return ?

5-0 is doing jackanory again...lol

i don't agree with shorting - i think it is a scummy way of earning a living and can destroy companies and rob investors.

that being said - how could you short cnsl?

there arent enough trades to evidence someone pre selling shares to drop the price. there are no shorts disclosed on the relevant bodies.

check lse - even they have nothing listed on the relevant tab

you know this - hence why you tried to excuse it in your post

spread betting - i know nothing about. however i suspect for it to work you would need a) lots of shares being traded and b) significant movement.

cnsl is flat lining most of the time. who would match your bet in the opposite direction?

the small sels which you consider well timed and strategic to hit sp - i go with occams razor..people eventually sell up as they either need the money or have finally given up on the share . the amounts are small because that is all that is left of their much larger amount that they initially invested

critics on here have got it right time after time...the proof i hear you ask?

look at the sp - it is 1.75p above the historic low and a whole £1 below its high. that is the real story.

i would also believe the company - when they tell you this will be yet another loss making year then you better believe it

lets be honest if that last sentence is all you have to ramp with - maybe a trip down the pub with your mates mate who knows the bar tender that serves the gracious fellow?..lmfao

Exactly cold spy - the finance of the debt wont be a problem to some.

wood had sorted it out much more debt previously - the only possible thing against them at the moment is that the current management would be better at working as clowns in a circus

Firstly once they brought up finance in such a bad way...they had to address it....and salvage sp.

Secondly I don't think they want the sidara offer but have to be in a position to refuse it - so need finance sorted more than ever .

Sitara will make their offer with the debt in mind...like they did the previous 9 times

Let's be honest we will prob hear from ft before management

Sharerebel.

Ii hold 50-60% of the shares. Actually in theory they have another 5-6% in shorts ..which technically they own as they have to buy back.

The shorts are gambling on a deal not being reached

That is a possibility..although sidara have tried 9 times already..and more importantly the SP is distressed through a combination of issues.

The company will either have to accept the deal or prove finance..hence why they would seem to be accelerating this via ft article.. either way the SP will recover some of not all of its recent loses through fear .

Personally I think the odds are stacked in the SP being higher..potentially considerably higher by the end of the month

Atan I know you can't read as you green striped Kate Calder but you are correct in your assumption that is them and they are as usual trying to get in an argument - even with someone not responding

Agree yorkshire

My thinking is still the same..although I would love the 110p or 175p tweeted

My logic still says a 90p offer which forces the company's hand..they won't want to take it ...but will need finance to be sorted in order to reject it.

I suspect they have been sounding out finance options since valentines day massacre..but the move by sidara has expedited things ..hence approaching rothschild

So twitter guy says 7am tmrw eg rns.

If so ( and I don't mean another multitude of holding ones) it will raise his credibility with the other tweets he has made recently.

Tmrw gonna be interesting

As I have said a number of times..they will only be in a position to reject bid if they have finance sorted out.

They clearly don't want to sell to sidara

But the current so could force their hand if they don't have the security of finance

It will be win win win for shareholders

The first drop was due to review ( we now know no biggie) the second was due to CEO being churlish and not addressing possible equity raise ( whether true or not)

So finance sorted and this will rise sp a chunk

Twitter guy says runs tmrw

Justice

.that is rollocks.

There won't be an offer of £3

So the r1r2r3 broken today.

Prob resistance at 50p just because the tens tend to.

Very interesting...has herd arrived or leak?

We already know the review is no issue

Isle - i see the finance question being the key to this.

if no issue i think wg will resist takeover - but may be forced by II

if there are any issues then there will defo be a sell

Are we at 20p yet? Sharebel?

If sharebel reported the x account then no wonder posts taken down

Time will tell if there was any merit

Hosai - that was my initial thought on hearing 175p

however why make up such a figure if you wanted to con people? 135p - yes,,still very believable

crazy thing is people can still buy at 42p