The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
SMcN and Uggy100 Fair Cop.
Yes you are correct, thick thumbs again it should have been 5,000,000 shares.
CHAT
MCap £27m. Who/why would someone sell 15m shares at 0.30p - value £15k when the Victory sale is on the cards?
Am I stupid for holding on to my shares? How much do you assess the value of V to RBD?
CHAT
Maybe UJO will decide that to purchase its own shares is the best way to proceed at the moment? That way the board still maintains its options and UJO gets stronger. if you pay a dividend that is money flowing OUT of UJO. Probably not a popular suggestion.
CHAT
CHAT 0.36pence
Whoops! decimal point 0 36pence ----- 5.77m shares,
CHAT
Thats a lot of cash! 5.77m shares.
CHAT.
CB - well researched!!
Can anyone think of any other reason why RBD would have formed this Company?
CHAT
Heid, how fortunate to choose your 'starting price' at 12p.
Majority of SH did not have the good fortune to 'buy the dip' and acquired their holdings at a higher entry level. I am not disagreeing with your general sentiment and belive that UJO at 30p are underpriced. That however does not detract from what is your rather naive choice. You can fool ..................
CHAT
Most of my yellow coffins exist because of the rubbish the occupants produced or because of the deceased's foul language. I still read this board but some posters still resort to pseudo swearing? I am not a prude but it belittled you. Why not turn over a new leaf with the new tax year?
CHAT
Heid ----- 'That huge stack is flaring away with a tanker filling up …'
What is the cost/economics of coverting this gas into electricity?
Surely such a 'green agenda' would be a positive for the company?
What is stopping UJO? Do we need planning permission to do this?
CHAT
Masterbaker,
I agree with your positive proposal to change the heading. It was sensible but, too many stuck with the 'No' heading, pehaps because they were either against the application being approved or they followed the 'No' heading like sheep.
Now some, no doubt those who would prefer the Planning Application [PA] to fail, have muddied the waters with the introduction of the term 'Fracking'. There is no mention of fracking in the Planning Application and the use of the term is a diversionary tactic by some on this BB. Too many BB members have fallen into the trap to comment on this unrelated subject. The PA, will be considered by Councillors on 17 March. They will either vote 'for' or 'against' the recommendation (to approve) of their Planning Officer. Last time COP26 was in the headlines; this time it is the sadness of PUTIN's invasion of Ukraine. We have to respect the decision of these Councillors although I am sure that they realize that a vote 'against' will result in an Appeal and an almost certain reversal of their decision. I believe that common sence and a realization of the longterm benefits to the local community will this time prevail.
CANCHAT