RE: Opposition to "a-virion" trademark!16 Jun 2021 11:46
Is that objection is based on the VIRKON™ S trademark and if alpha-virion is sufficiently similar to be mistaken for that product?
As reported here:
http://dictionary.sensagent.com/Virkon/en-en/
"Virkon is a multi-purpose disinfectant. It contains oxone (potassium peroxymonosulphate), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, sulphamic acid; and inorganic buffers."
"Virkon has a wide spectrum of activity against viruses, some fungi, and bacteria.[2] However, it is less effective against spores and fungi than some alternative disinfectants.[3]"
"Virkon has a faint raspberry odour, but the scent is still considered unpleasant by some"
I can understand why they would not want the competition! Some people have said that our masks smell nice like popcorn :)
Although the 2 could be used in competing products I personally don't see how anybody with half a brain could mistake one for the other.
Alpha virion starts with 'alpha' not a'V' so it's a completely different letter.
Also 'virion' actually has a meaning as quoted in the dictionary:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/virion
"Definition of virion
: a complete virus particle that consists of an RNA or DNA core with a protein coat sometimes with external envelopes and that is the extracellular infectious form of a virus"
I can't find any reference to the letters 'VIRKON' being a word with meaning other than the name of their product.
Obviously people know what a 'virion' is because it's in the dictionary and noone thinks its a 'virkon' because that's just a made up word.
If people were getting mixed up between the 2 then presumably there would be a slew of mistakes in the scientific literature where the wrong word had been substituted incorrectly?
Personally I think we should have gone with 'nano-virion' anyway as it highlights our nano technology inside.