RE: Exactly as anticipated...13 Feb 2026 08:00
I have taken comfort from the fact the big boys own Future. I did some research into the breakdown
Top 5 holders own 35.2%
Top 10 56.7%
Top 25 79.5 expected to go up to 82% by end of 26 if they retain their positions
why concentration matters:
Voting power. Resolutions requiring 75% approval can be passed or blocked by the group of 25, they effectively control the strategy, ie buy backs, M&A, sale of GoCo
Liquidity So much stock is held by large 'sticky' institutions the daily free float relatively low, this is why small moves by hedge funds[shorting 5-6% of the stock ] can cause significant price swings.
Takeover target. It is an efficient target for private equity as they would only need to convince a small number of holders.
All these big funds have not shed their positions, I think they are all in for at least double this price, so any takeover talk would be at the £10 mark.
Very low liquidity could lead to a very big short squeeze when the time comes. I feel the big institutions are letting the shorters keep the price low, Future reduces the pot cheaply. They increase their % without adding shares.
If the buyback reduces the pot to 90m the top 20 holders increase their ownership from 79.5% to 83.7%.
Ai . reducing the share count to 90m liquidity squeeze becomes very dangerous for short sellers with few shares to cover their positions, potentially causing a rapid spike in price.
Could be fun!!!