RE: Greenland raise?13 Apr 2026 20:45
There's a lot of opinions on this board. Here's some FACTS. Please dyor and check them, but this is FACTUAL.
80M holds 30% of the Jameson Land basin with a free carry through the first 2 drills β no upfront cost, full upside exposure
Over $250M already spent on exploration and research β this is a data-backed basin, not a guess. Factual.
Exposure the largest undrilled onshore basins globally β scale here is enormous.
Basin potential in the multi-billion barrel range, even a small % recovery is huge.
Maths is where this gets silly:
Say just 1 billion barrels recoverable (tiny vs estimates)
At even $5 per barrel in-ground value = $5B asset value
80M 30% stake = $1.5B equivalent exposure vs ~Β£80M mcap β ~15β20x upside.
If itβs bigger (2β3bn barrels or higher value per barrel):
Youβre talking $10B+ basin value
80M share = $3B+ exposure
Thatβs 30x+ territory from here
Stake is in the actual land (freehold) β not just paper shares.
Greenland Energy Company share price does NOT dictate 80M price β separate companies, separate listings
If GLND raises funds, 80M does NOT get diluted β funding happens at partner level
80M retains its asset regardless of market noise β value comes from discovery.
First drill success (EARLY Q3)= instant re-rate scenario β market wonβt wait for production.
Right now itβs priced like nothing works
If even part of this hits, valuation gap is massive
IGNORE THE NEGATIVITY, UNREAL LEVELS TO BE IN AT RIGHT NOW.
PS FOR INFO - Racht2? What ever her name is.... is actually called Rachael Hogarth, dismissed from 80m. You can Google her π
As always, my opinion and dyor. (Although it's all above)
Please fact check me if your unsure, this is GOLDEN!!!!!!!!!!