RE: Paul Cuddon 'sell' note25 Sep 2024 08:40
Thank you for posting the link Craig. Yes it is the same as what PL posted, but this time I was using my Android phone and was able to get past the login boxes that were - and still are - a barrier to translating the page on my Windows laptop.
So here is a translation of the article on the German language version of Investing.com about Cuddon's note, plus the single comment, which is in English:
Avacta disappoints in phase 1 study - Deutsche Bank downgrades shares to "Sell"
Author: Robert Zach, Published on September 17, 2024, 8:23 a.m.
Investing.com - Deutsche Bank (ETR:DBKGn) has lowered its rating for Avacta (LON:AVCT) from "Hold" to "Sell" following phase 1 data on the drug AVA6000 at the ESMO Congress in Barcelona. Analyst Paul Cuddon justified the decision in a study published on Monday by saying that the data presented did not meet expectations.
Of the 57 patients treated with various doses of AVA6000, only three showed a partial response (PR), while six patients showed a minor response. These response rates are not competitive with either established treatment methods or new therapeutic approaches, Cuddon wrote.
Avacta divided the patients into two groups based on the expected expression level of the target antigen (fibroblast activating protein, FAP) from scientific publications. In the group with higher expected expression values, three patients showed a partial response and four a minor response. However, no patient showed a complete response, the analyst said. In the FAP-medium group, none of the patients showed even a partial response.
Cuddon left the price target unchanged at 40 pence; the last closing price was 70 pence.
- - - - - - - - -
Comments
Flabber Gasted 17. Sept. 2024, 08:27
Clearly this gentleman does not understand how clinical trials work. This trial is at a safety and tolerability stage, not efficacy and is based on patients who are heavily pre-treated (which could mean Dox 'immune' cancers) end of life and would not be able to be treated with standard Doxorubicin. To see tumour reductions of over 45% in some patients and durable tumour reduction even after treatment is incredibly exciting at this stage. So, my conclusion here is that this 'analyst' is either incredibly poorly researched, unable to process complex 'ish' data, or working to manipulate a stock price for personal gain. Which is it?