Member Info for Brombarb

Newanda Western Blocks off the agenda?
I do have doubts about partners and just wonder if OSH and their w.i. partners may absorb ultimately.

Just as that "50/50" is binary I think a few here like to represent everything in that light, causes a bit of doubt, which in some cases is no bad thing but as usual I question the agenda at times.
Before last night no one from PMO or 88E had made any comment to the effect that this was a 100% certainty, in fact DW had pointed out the geological risks quite specifically, so no surprises.

Hold 60% working interest on 2.4Bbl if heaven forbid Charlie-1 disappointed what would they do?
Sure they believe it wont disappoint in any case.

we may be the operator but PMO are financing and have 60% of the working interest, who will hold the whip hand when it comes to what data is released?, after all PMO have shareholders and stock market obligations also.
I don't know.
So far PMO have released little, but nothing of market/price sensitivity yet perhaps will change when we spud.

Thanks everyone, almost feel as if I was there :-))
Good chats.

if we get a half decent recording will get into Wiki, know Lemajor is a whizz at refining and cleaning up audio so we may be able to get something.
that lease again
http://dnr.alaska.gov/projects/las/#filetype/ADL/filenumber/393380/landflag/y/searchtype/casefile/reporttype/abstract

10:18 Newanda that's the sort of aside that one wants to hear,good stuff!
The fact that Malguk#1 well data and cuttings etc are available means that the seismic inversion will be so so more accurate and revealing - US$23M worth of proof. :-))
Would be nice to know what the calculated COS actually is rather than the binary 50/50, perhaps PMO as the now majority lease holder have the whip hand in data release.
http://dnr.alaska.gov/projects/las/#filetype/ADL/filenumber/393380/landflag/y/searchtype/casefile/reporttype/abstract
Sure someone in PMO demanded a figure calculated as link below or very similar
https://wiki.aapg.org/Risk:_expected_value_and_chance_of_success

from description sounds as if Dazzle1000 was recording on his phone, not heard any comments regarding professional video.

01:40 Mickey have met DW on three occasions now and always thought much the same, think that the acquisition strategy that he has been employed meant that post HRZ (for now) we had options and potential conventional value to attract suitors as we have done with PMO.

last Dekker (now with OSH) presentation
http://dog.dnr.alaska.gov/Documents/ResourceEvaluation/20181213_BrookianTopsetStratPlay_PetrolSysElements_AGS.PDF
pages 8-9 get into Malguk
was that lower layer Shublik?

Newanda thanks for your posts, the well data for Icewine#1 is available via link below if you are interested.
http://dggs.alaska.gov/gmc/seismic-well-data.php
you will need to "purchase" even though download if free.

interesting if a little historical now
https://www.alaskajournal.com/2017-05-10/new-life-north-slope-100-million-years-making

thanks for the updates from yesterday's presentation.

minime77 the drill will not be a production drill so although it might generate a tanker or few that will be all at this stage, even if the drill is successful CR will give options, we do not want to enter negotiations with no cash in hand.
What happens with no money - nothing positive.

actually no one did say that the 100% bit, my apologies

the fact that someone asks why not 100% says a lot about this board at times :-)
read up on reserves calculations definitions and risks
http://88ewiki.wikidot.com/drilling

ST no doubts its going ahead, doubt any new news but those attending will be able to gauge confidence I am sure.

wish I could Mickey have one or two for me :-))

meeting is OK to go ahead it seems

can't see any reference that shareholders only.

invitations initially sent to those on 88 Energy mailing list, some of those names may be former investors and perhaps some who have never invested, but great majority will be LTH I would imagine.