RE: Accurate NAV?27 Jul 2021 21:53
Yes, I think most long term holders have their own spreadsheet and track NAV and staking revenues as best they can. Most of the holdings have been in RNS’s over the years so easy to identify. The biggest problem is BTC and ETH whose holdings I’ve never seen detailed. Then it’s down to personal choice how you value any of the yet to be listed tokens or where KR1 have shares in a business rather than tokens.
Things get quickly out of date, the link you put up doesn’t have Vega, Karura or Clover in for example.
At least if you do it yourself you know what the logic is. None of them will be wholly accurate so a $5-10m variance doesn’t really matter.
Staking revenues is more difficult, not least as they haven’t done any updates on staking for some time now. I just took the latest RNS, calculated the average monthly tokens received for each and multiply that by the latest price, assuming they still get that level. I wish they would follow ARB and do a regular operational update on staking revenues as I don’t think anyone but the committed LTH know much about this area. Visibility of staking revenues would help rerate the share price in my view.