RE: Race against time2 Nov 2024 22:08
Bismarck claims he has “better things to do” but has recently taken to posting nonsense statements here, in a style similar to another troll that frequents this board, late into the night.
All very strange behaviour for someone who doesn’t hold any interest..
Barely any posts over the year which indicates to me this isn’t your main account. Now given the sudden change of stance, repeating the same rhetoric as Goldinvestor7 after rising to the bait..
There can’t be so many pathetic roaches plaguing this chat forum posting late into the evening. What kind of sad people would pour so much time and effort into sharing misinformation and nonsense statements on a company chat forum they are not invested in?
Quick reminder, Bismark wrote last year on 30th November he thought the price of gold could drop to $1,300/oz within 3 years and what is even stranger made his investment case for allegedly holding Hum at the time based on $1,800/oz gold “anything better is a real bonus”.. but has since gotten cold feet with the gold price trading above $2,700/oz.
The most recent update suggests net bank debt reduced $18 million last quarter, during the rainy season, while hedges kept the average price received low at around $2,200/oz. This quarter there are fewer hedges spread across circa 40koz production so they will receive around $2,450/oz. The operating costs will reduce this quarter over Q3 thanks to higher output too.
Like I said before Bismarck your fear-mongering isn’t fooling anyone, especially now we know the debt is due to slide off.