Member Info for Bozi

Addicknt - not much in the way of disagreement from me.

I suppose I just thought this was the one. Hopefully we can all use the final outcome to our benefit in whichever way the individual prefers. That's the main thing at the end of the day.

*invariably chew

*shakes head*

Well Monte, there's probably an element of truth in that comment.

I think in Stackhigh's case there is an intelligence there but people misinterpret it because the overall message is intentionally to counter their intuition.

As I said, I don't agree with that overall message but I do respect Stackhigh's attempted positioning to counter what can become an echo chamber when certain posters get on a roll.

You know where I stand. I don't wish to labour the point. I believe and have for some time that the outcome will be a less than satisfactory handover of our flagship asset and probably everything else besides. It'll probably be an indictment of SolGold biting off more than they could invariably true, although I still believe the strategy was right to pursue a regional portfolio - on the basis that Ecuador was hugely ubderexplored due to historic mining policy and the opportunity that arose was one the company was right to take. It's how they capitalised upon that was sub-optimal.

If StackHigh wanted to justify his position, he could offer an explanation to the company's decision not to replace the key executives and personnel that have recently left the company, namely our Chief of People Tania Cashman. Every organisation needs good people in HR and it seems SolGold are happy to carry on as they are. That, and the outcomes set out for consideration by the strategic review.

Q2 2023 will be the time in my opinion, particularly if recession has started to bite and copper demand slows. Oh will we be ripe.

StackHigh - if you don't mind me saying you are kind of wasting your time with the intellect.

You end up getting accused of not holding, of wanting a cheaper entry, of being a BHP shill, etc.

After some time of being open to everyone's views I am now wielding the filter. Bubble was the first to go on it this week for the incessant nonsense and there will be one or two more to add.

Keep firing your opinion out there and don't take no muck. I don't agree with you by the way in terms of still being around at the 2023 AGM, and I think some of your justification is flimsy, but you're entitled to it nonetheless.

Speak for yourself Josepi. This concept that SolGold should just surrender to the market in full so you and others can close your latest trade is pretty ridiculous if I'm being honest.

This concept of just wanting to pass on something like this for 40-50p is beyond me. Where is your concept of value?

You think other companies don't have problems, political influences from inside and outside the walls, etc? This idea that folks can take their swelling SOLG proceeds and find 3/4/5 opportunities just as good if not better is a madness.

The idea behind investing is you get absolute top bang for your buck via your chosen asset over the timeframe you are invested. The dreams of many back in 2017 were just that as you say, but that doesn't mean we need to cave in now and let this go for £1.2-£1.5bn.

This is why spinning out the regionals really does suit everyone. Anyone with similar thinking to you can take your Solgold (Cascabel) sale proceeds of 40p and you can sell your stock in the spin off company and just walk away, leaving those of us who want to remain and believe that the regional assets in Ecuador represent a value opportunity to do so.

StukeyBlue

Everyone has a right to form their own opinion on who is sensible and who is not.

As long as it's treated as opinion and not fact there's no problem.

More to the point, when did you Redknight?

So they'll appoint them before CGP holders can ratify the merger on 9 Jan 23.

They'll also dispense with Maxit and your mates Bob will be back out in the cold and not very happy at all.

You're both wrong to be voting against any of them but fat chance of RK1 acknowledging that.

Booting Mather, Twigger and Clare out now is the sledgehammer to the strategic review. Stooge directors then put forward by BHP and NCM (probably end up with DC back) before the pill is dropped under the new equity allocation.

We all know how bad management has been in general and why we're all in this position but if you want to turn your $1.5m Aussie into $300k Aussie then go on ahead. Fantastic Christmas present that will be for you and the family.

Sjn1980

What are you hoping your voting strategy will achieve this late in the day, but to create further weakness?

What have the Cornerstone guys proved they can sell? Nothing from where I'm sat.

How do you expect Nick to be influential with his shareholding which is going to be subject to merger and capital raise dilution?

I feel you and your mates aren't fully thinking this one through, unless there's some connections to BHP that we don't know about...

You'll wake up yourself BBG with your head in a bowl of cornflakes.

Not happening.

Decisions like this from funds, especially sovereign wealth funds belonging to the state, do take this long.

A lot of analysis, due diligence and then red tape to go through when you're managing the citizen's money.

Because he has bought more than even he is comfortable with and he wants to start loosening a few off by playing other investors.

But he's not ramping. Honest guv.

Happy for them to take SolGold, as long as the regionals are demerged first.

In the pre-feasibility study released in 22 September ;-)

http://ir.q4europe.com/Tools/newsArticleHTML.aspx?solutionID=3674&customerKey=IronRidge&storyID=15558113

Bubble - Redknight posted some information here yesterday afternoon which he had lifted from the SOLG twitter group confirming some significant holding updates.

That might shed a bit of light.

20 weeks.

Addicknt - I think StackHigh knows full well what is going on here. They've just taken an opinion that riles those on this board who like to think a takeover is coming, purposely I suspect.

And I understand that because it's all that has been talked about for years here. It's dominated everything else to the extent that the fundamentals of the asset have often been overlooked for discussions about boardroom dynamics and corporate manoeuvring.

I do at least appreciate where he/she is coming from but decided instead to try and start a different conversation re the spin-off, which I think was worthwhile.

But one thing is for sure, if nothing happens by end of Q1/April, then a 2023 AGM becomes a huge question mark, such will the precarious nature of our position be and the likely predation that will likely bring.

Redknight 15:45

Lets be completely honest. I could be Jiangxi 's CEO and tell you with absolute certainty that they're not looking to buy SolGold but you still would ask for a stronger argument.

As it happens I'm not and I'm actually not ruling it out, but that's the difference between your view and that of the more moderated holders. We all acknowledge that it could happen. We just don't believe it absolutely will happen.

There's plenty of options.

Redknight at 13:36

"And I've never said there are majors circling SOLG..."

What on earth is earth have I just read? That's all Redknight has been suggesting for weeks on end.

And yo think 4 people recommended this post. Jesus.