Member Info for Bottmzup

Why do people think the short lived rise at the open was quickly sold in to?
It started like an Elon Musk rocket only to fizzle out before it left the tower!
Take note of how the market reacts...it doesn't lie.

I will take a new position at just below £1...maybe 98p, because I think that will be value...all things considered!

Ice, this thread has everything to do with the Avacta investment case, if you read it from the start.

Ok cj, lets see what plays out.
IF...the ongoing tests are successful, how long do you think it will be before its accepted as mainstream tech in the battle to beat cancer?
I would say years, if everything goes well.

Sorry tim, I meant 99.9%, as noted in the RNS I posted earlier.
Of course it would have stopped the spread if the majority of people wore them because it wouldn't have entered their airways!
Therefore it would have deminished the ability for the virus to claim another host, and just died within the mask.
The mask wearer wouldn't have got covid, so couldn't have then passed it on!
Simples really.

I think some of you guys need to wake up to how Govt's use their power to control the masses.
What was it Hanc*ock said...we need to scare the pants off everyone to make them have more jabs!
If you haven't had an incite in to how Govt's will tell you whatever they want to control you, during this pandemic then you weren't taking notice.

Except we were not just talking about Govt private enterprise principles, we were facing a once in a hundred year pandemic with the potential to kill many millions in this country alone.

Exactly D-Geeman, so if the Govt wanted, I mean really wanted to beat the pandemic they could have just bought the tech off of RMS and mass produced it!
But they didn't, thats why they didn't!

So now we're getting more healthy points of view, which is all I wanted from my first post.
These big pharma guys are gangsters, they will protect their $Bn's coming in at all costs, with ruthless determination.
They couldn't give a flying rats arris about your Grandmother, or Auntie, son, daughter, brother or sister...they just want to keep pumping out those treatments of hope that they know will never work.
Make no bones about it, this AVCT tech, if proven to work sucessfully, would basically cure cancer, or at least make cancer curable if you were unlucky enough to get it, via massive doses of chemo without the side effects.
The pills for this and pills for that as well as the morphine and axiety medications would not be needed, a massive loss for big pharma!

Dear oh dear cj62, now you've lost any credibilty because you've resorted to sweary insults...it means you dont have a meaningful point to make!

Exactly wyndrum.
I have not suggested the Govt would 'block' the AVCT tech, I'm saying that I dont have confidence that big pharma, and all of their offshoots, would allow this tech to just come in and put many parts of their cancer industry out of business overnight.
They would use every unscrupulous and crooked means in their power to delay, and delay and delay its use while they adjusted their agenda in order to profit from it.
Govt's around the world were only too happy to see the old and infirm to die...which alleviated the pensions crisis.
And, the world is overpopulated in relation to its resources.

Well cj62, my original point was to show the example of how Govt's and other bodies who run things could have bought in to these masks and saved many more lives, but it didn't suit their agenda.
The analogy being that being able to provide cancer sufferers with a larger dose of chemo may not fit the agenda of big pharma...who have Govt's and the WHO in their pockets. And who is at the top of WHO? Bill Gates!
The man who developed Microsoft, then went on to develop viruses so that he could then sell Antivirus software.

tim_t20, wrong...for a start it was Pharm2Farm who did the lab tests not NNN, and it was proven to kill the virus consistently for 7 hours of testing.
Remote Monitored Systems owned P2F but then went on to be renamed Nanosynth.
The masks copper nanoparticle membrane technology received MHRA approval, you dont get that if they hadn't proved their claims.
It killed the virus whether breathing in or out, and had a bigger design which covered the face better than the pointless blue ones.
They were available on Amazon, amoungst other outlets, for c£12 for 10, or less per mask if you bought a 50 pack...so about £1 per mask...a small price to pay for 99.99% gauranteed protection!

https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/NNN/anglo-indian-pro-larva-mask-partnership/15105728

The Pro-Larva Face Mask is Made in Britain using ground-breaking patented a-Virion™ nanotechnology that is clinically approved to kill 99.9% of Covid and Influenza viruses, within 5 minutes of contact, and continues to kill the virus for seven hours.

My case doth rest.

How fascinatingly childish Watching, do you feel like your investment is being questioned by a justified question?
Have I hit a nerve?
Surely you can come up with a grown up reply, even if you don't agree!

Maybe not I suspect.

Google it....Pro-Larva face mask, the company is now called Nanosynth, the company that developed them was Phar2Farm in Nottingham University, the founder of the technology was Dr Gareth Cave.
The mask had a copper nanoparticle membrane which emitted ions on to the virus killing it within a couple of minutes.
The Gov't didn't want to use them because they wanted the pandemic to continue giving them powers to impliment more controls over us....as we all now know via the Han**** tapes.

The reason I'm cynical is partly due to the Pro-Larva face mask farce. It wasn't that it didn't work to kill the covid virus on contact...proven in lab tests, it was because the Gov't didn't buy the patent up, manufacture them in their hundreds of millions and disperse them free to everyone in the country. It would have all but eradicated the pandemic within weeks-months because the virus would have run out of hosts.
The Gov't even worked with the company and the masks got MHRA approval, so it wasn't as though they weren't aware of the technology.

Like I said, the big boys who control things at the top work in sinister and mysterious ways to fit their agendas.

I've traded these before and have them in my watchlist for a long time waiting for the right attractive time to have another buy.
My question is about how the big pharma cancer industry would react if this technology actually reaches the market? It would certainly change how cancer is treated, and would put a few high powered players noses out of joint.
A bit like the big energy companies having their positions challenged by the new green energy 'solutions', they don't like it, and tend to try anything to slow the progress in order to maintain their dominance.

Big pharma and energy companies have a lot of power (pardon the pun), and can work in sinister ways, as seen during the pandemic by the likes of Pfizer covering up their testing proceedure details.

Avacta's chemo solution would be a game changer, on paper, so what do people think about whether the cancer industry would see this disruptive tech as detrimental to their massive cash cow, and therefore seek to delay it for decades, as the big energy players have been doing to the new green agenda.

It would be interesting to get some views.

https://twitter.com/SeanDentBsc/status/1643326446314704896

And someone is spending a lot on advertising cooperatives outside of TV and radio!

Why virtual stadiums are a testing ground for the next phase of sports sponsorship

https://www.thedrum.com/profile/bidstack/news/virtual-stadiums-a-testing-ground-for-the-next-phase-of-sports-sponsorship

The possibilities are frankly endless and almost completely untapped.

Is he still shaking like a shyting dog! Dear oh dear.
Glad I've got him filtered alongside helx the office poodle...just a couple of barking mad hounds who timed their attack (buys) wrong, got bitten back harder, and been barking about it ever since!

Niether of their bitter dog poo comments are worth reading, just put them in a bag, tie a knot in it, and dump it in a bin labeled 'bitter litter'!!

Nice buys, the market believes.