Member Info for Bottmzup

Yes Adverty do but not the same offering as Bids, so we must be the first multi-device in-game ad platform to be awarded.
They do Augmented Reality and 3D type games, some of which are very strange.
If you Google them you get `videos` results on the first page, I watched a couple and they seem to be aimed towards 6 year olds with very childish graphics and that wacky annoying arcade music playing...very odd....they`re Swedish ya know! :-)

This isn`t just like a cycling proficiency certificate to take home, show Mum, and then put it somewhere you can`t find it!
Its important.

For many brands and agencies, being IAB Gold Standard certified is a prerequisite for inclusion in media planning.

The IAB has also confirmed that we are the first multi-device in-game advertising platform to be awarded the IAB Gold Standard certification.

amirichyet, well most new investors will not be buying because of what was said or done in the past, they`ll be looking to take part in the future of in-game advertising by way of the well structured and carefully built professional creation that Bidstack are on track to complete.
Much much further on with the development, enough money in the bank for the next 12 months without revenues, an Institution(1 so far) on board and further Directors putting money in suggests there`s no point in looking backwards now.

You hold on to your memories, while we look to the vision of the future.

There again, some people could say that you are being a tad `elastic`with the truth, the following is what he actually said after starting by saying that he had visited some of the discussion forums to get a sense of the sentiment.....`I know there`s a few people out there running through the calculations based on the Peterhouse note, we have not reset the number, and we have not issued anything to suggest that we are not completely comfortable, so we are working towards ensuring that Bidstack`s Group is going to absolutely become the biggest media owner in the world of video games. We`re on track, we`re very comfortable with how things are going...as a whole.`

So he never mentioned the H1 number, and as we know at the time the discussion on the BB`s about `the number` was referring to the full year number in the note.

That bit made up about 10-15 seconds of the 25 minute interview, the rest of which was very interesting, including when they went on to discuss the £6m raised by Anzu through WPP, and he explained that they had lost their neutrality by doing that, and so limited the amount of large organisations that they could go on to do business with because of the competition between them.

Bidstack remain neutral, so have the luxury of doing deals with anyone in the advertising world.

correction
*there are no long term `holders` here yet*
There are plenty of `investors`....I know, I`m one of them.

Following on with the lying, or shall we say `being genuine` theme, some of bashers do like to remind everybody how James Draper made the comment in one of his interviews around 12 months ago, about the share price potential of reaching 20x the price at the time, which was about 30p`ish.
And he did make that comment, I`ve listened to it more than once....so I also know that what the bashers fail to remember to remind everybody is that in the same exact part of the interview JD made it very clear that he was talking about a long way down the road, I think the number `5` years was mentioned pretty much in the same sentence, he made sure he added that.
The bashers hold that bit back.

So that vision fits in with the LONG TERM holders time frame.
The company itself currently is only in the short-medium term development of its whole history, and certainly has only really been on the radar of the stock market for just over 12 months, when daily traded volumes really took off.....so there are no long term investors here yet!

You see the distinction?

Fursake, to say that when JD said he was entirely comfortable with revenues he was lying is actually not true is it, afterall they were generating `some` revenue (not none) and he may well have been entirely comfortable with that because it was generated as part of the test spends, and therefore part of the long term overall plan in the construction of the end to end in-game advertising technology platform...which he was entirely comfortable with, and so not lying.

Well if LTH`s had done their research in full they would understand that such a technology would be a very intricate and complex technology to build to a workable and successful state, and that it would take time and careful planning to construct.
But I suppose if they`re really long term holders then that shouldn`t bother them too much...as long as its built correctly to the highest standard which eventually performs like a 24/7/365 money printing machine!

Genuine long term holders will be prepared to wait, because if the end game is achieved then it won`t matter if their average is 5p,10p or 20p...they`ll still make a lot of profit on their investment if they are genuinely prepared to wait for their `LONG TERM` investment to realise its full potential.

Thats why I quite often finish my posts with....
#This Is Just The Start

Well it was supposed to be posted on the Bids discussion which I quickly did after realising my mistake here...also a bit tongue in cheek for them over there.

It was a genuine mistake because I thought I was on that site, so if anyone wants to report it for being on the wrong BB then I`d be totally happy with that, if I could have deleted it here I would have.

Anybody notice how swamped with adverts LSE has become recently...pain in the ar** isn`t it!
Advertisers must be gagging to promote their products, and probably know that they are irritating, but LSE agree to go with them anyway.

If only there was a way to make them less `in your face`....more sort of native maybe, so that your concentration and enjoyment of being battered on a BB is not interrupted.
Maybe one day someone will come up with a way to included adverts on things like gaming for example....where the gamers are so engrossed in performing well that the adverts are almost subliminal, because they make up part of the natural background!
Now that would be a cracking idea if someone could actually build a way of doing that , and a win win win for all concerned.

#This Is Just The Start

Oops, sorry, wrong board.
I am in here and a good day today so onwards and upwards.

Anybody notice how swamped with adverts LSE has become recently...pain in the ar** isn`t it!
Advertisers must be gagging to promote their products, and probably know that they are irritating, but LSE agree to go with them anyway.

If only there was a way to make them less `in your face`....more sort of native maybe, so that your concentration and enjoyment of being battered on a BB is not interrupted.
Maybe one day someone will come up with a way to included adverts on things like gaming for example....where the gamers are so engrossed in performing well that the adverts are almost subliminal, because they make up part of the natural background!
Now that would be a cracking idea if someone could actually build a way of doing that , and a win win win for all concerned.

#This Is Just The Start

So I rest my case, its Friday and far too much to enjoy beyond arguing the toss about Technical analysis. But I shall return so if anybody else wants to challenge me I`d be happy to engage.
Enjoy your evening all.

Check your charts shearclass, 14th November is when the gap got filled the first time, then went back up to 400p, which you`ve basically helped to confirm the principle of how it works, here....
https://uk.tradingview.com/chart/IpdCORbs/

Secondly I actually never mentioned HZM at all, I looked back and from early Nov to well in to Dec I never mentioned HZM once, so you`ve either got the wrong person, or you`ve got the wrong year, either way you did help me to show how it works, as evidenced by the candle with the long wick which denotes strong buying pressure on the day.

If you wish to double check I`m not lying...or in denial....ha ha ha, go back to page 40 on my history to get back to around that time and you`ll see.

Let me make one thing loud and clear once and for all, I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT GAPS `NEED` TO BE FILLED...or will be filled, or always get filled. Nothing in charting is guaranteed, its `loading probability` in your favour simply because of the amount of other traders who follow the same principles.....it used worldwide on every stock exchange in operation, why do the nay sayers think that is????

As far as examples, I could pull up any chart and give multiple examples of how the principles of technical analysis played out like clockwork.
It doesn`t work 100% of the time because the stock market couldn`t function if it did...obviously. But it does give a savy investor the advantage of timing.
I always use the analogy of a snooker player, you have to be a good potter AND be able to control the white ball to increase your success rate.
So use the fundamentals for the `why` and the technicals for the `when`!

I`m glad you pointed out this example shearclass, because as a trader my prediction worked a treat. What you have failed to add is that the price came down to close the gap at 348p and then went back up to 400p before falling back, so a trader could have easily banked a full 10%, after costs, not bad interest for about 3 days...it would take about 20 years in a bank!!!

Not everyone is a buy and hold merchant today....thats so..well, Neanderthal!

I think you need to look at yourself and my posts and tell me where I have ever said a gap `NEEDS` to be filled? I`ve never said that...you have!

I`ve been studying charting for a long time and I have never understood the principle of using gaps as anything other than ONE of the chart patterns to look out for and use should the price be heading towards a gap..upwards or downwards.

I`ve had this `chat` many times about TA and found that most people who oppose how it works a) get it wrong because they don`t understand it, and b) don`t understand it because they`ve never looked in to it....so how can they have an opinion?
Most of the are scared of charting because they can`t get their head around it and become insecure, so their only solution is to lash out and ridicule those who use it.
Have a look at my example below and tell me that is just reading tea leaves and chicken bone nonsense, and I`ll tell you you`re in denial.

You still don`t get it Cocoa, and probably never will.
I`ll give you an example, Investor A wants to buy some NCYT shares, he`s done the research and decides he wants in, so he waits for the market to open and just buys...at whatever price... because he`s sure that the sp will hit previous highs, lets say 325p, which it was at on 1st June.

Technical Investor B also wants in, but wants to wait for a confirmation buy signal, and in this case he would be looking for price to break above, hold, and close above the recent falling trend line. Price does go up on 2nd June but falls back and closes below the trend line so he stays in cash.
Since then there has been pretty decent falls, so the RSI and daily stochastics head negative and the technical trader stays in cash as he watches the price fall through 300p...then 250p and so on.
So he`s looking to time the reversal, and sees the gap at c218p, so he thinks..`well I`m not going to buy until that gap is filled, and if there`s any news in the meantime I`ll just buy if its good`!
But the news doesn`t come, so he waits, and today he decides to buy at 220p because the gap got filled.
So Investor A paid 325p, and savvy technical investor B paid 220p!!
So which one`s working on Neanderthal principles and which one is the modern day investor?
I know which one I prefer to be.