Member Info for Bottmzup

Anyway, I`ve had my say, and answered a direct question.
Something helx refuses to do...again.
Thats me done for the day.

Monkfish, I don`t `need` to do anything with my money that I don`t want to.
You `need` to stop telling others what they `need`!

Girdz, you still here? I thought with all your doom mongery of share price collapse over the weekend you would have convinced yourself to sell up and move on to a more promising pastures new venture.
But no, you`re still offering nervous and depressing tales of doom and despair.
Did you notice how many £5k and £6k buys went through at just under 5p this morning?
The funding will clear the runway for further development, some people find that nerve jangling, others stay calm, particularly if they`re in for the long term.

personA, my blind ramping, as you call it, is simply my long term investment case...surely I`m allowed to air that on a public discussion about the company?
On the other hand, helx is frantically deramping this company daily for almost two years, with his imaginary position, so I respond calling out his lies, and reserve the right to defend my investment case.

Just for a bit more clarity, when I said `I also think this is being `arranged`slowly in the background to reduce JD`s % holding! I meant to infer that I think that the share price and progress is being somewhat held back, because the big money players don`t want JD to hold such a large % of the company.
This could turn in to a very lucrative cash cow down the line, particularly when the category gains more authenticity with the agencies and publishers after the format is officially recognised via certification. So the big greedy`s in the background want a bigger slice, and JD`s % holding doesn`t fit with their needs.

Indiscipline, I think the market would prefer if he stepped aside and let someone with more experience in running a company take the CEO role.
I also think this is being `arranged`slowly in the background to reduce JD`s % holding!

Having said that, I think it would have been difficult for any CEO of such a net new ad category company to have done a lot better because it is largely dependant on the ad agencies and games developers to decide how quick the new ad category develops, considering that a lot depends on the official certification of the format.

Would I prefer that one of the top Advisory Committee members takes the CEO role now? Yes.

Thought so, thats why what you say has no credibility...liar!
I`ll make it even simpler...
Did you ever buy shares in Bids.
If so, did you ever sell them.
Or, do you still hold them.

Or, my favourite, you never bought any shares and have just been inserted in to this discussion by a paymaster to trash talk and bash Bidstack because of the interests of your gang master and his associates?

Ok, I`ll make the question simple.
Did you buy shares in Bids...when...and at what price?
If yes, did you sell those shares...when...and at what price?
Or, do you still hold the shares that you`ve always claimed to have bought?

These are very simple questions, so a politician style cryptic answer is not good enough.

In fact that would make you the number 1 mug on this entire forum going back 18 months or so.

You`re definitely not as sharp as you make out if you didn`t sell after all your 3400 bashing posts!

So you realised the game was up but didn`t sell these imaginary shares...yeah right!

What do you mean by you took it on the chin over 12 months ago then helx?

Artyh, thats why what he says carries no credibility.
He`s been banging the same drum for over 18 months, yet hasn`t sold his imaginary shares!!! Who`s the real mug?
He`s either a liar, or ridiculously stupid.

helx...and you my fellow are an absolute liar.

Some have suggested that a lower forecast broker note helps to secure a CBILS loan. Hmm, interesting.
It would be a good shout, after all the ad agencies have held back in their campaigns because people just aren`t going out to shop and spend their money, ok you can shop online but it doesn`t scratch the surface of high street spend in a lot of brands, so ad agencies have held back their campaigns during lockdowns.
Stifel by their own admission have stated that forecasting on Bids is, by its nature....high risk.
VALUATION. Bidstack is pioneering a new ad format which targets the video games sector- a market that reaches ~2.7bn people around the world. Forecast risk is high, but the potential is significant.
We expect revenues to build on FY20 levels, but as `go live` dates and games popularity are hard to determine, we consider the number and quality of games as a more appropriate metric to track long term progress. In addition, we see certification of the format as an important hurdle as it will enable fully automated sales, key to scaling longer term. We retain our target price of 8.5p. This is set at a discount to our underlying DCF to factor in near term funding requirements.

A £4m revenue estimate is probably more realistic for 2021, and most investors/commentators/watchers would have wondered about a £9m estimate, which after all was issued by Stifel, not Bidstack!

So £4m then, lets take that as the `new` Stifel estimate, as high risk as the forecasting of that may be.
£80,000 a week! Not bad as a growing forecast compared to the full year turnover of £140,000 for the year ending 2019.

The current £20m market cap prices in all sorts of negatives, so buying at this level is not foolish considering the sub sector of the multi billion dollar market Bidstack are operating in, and the fact that they are leading the field in the IGA competitors market.

No dramas here, and no dramas getting funded for the next stage of development.
#This Is Just The Start

Roley, did you see the article released last year, and did you read it?

Also, all MM`s manipulate the prices of stocks, its how they make their money, on the spread.
As far as the Bids share price in 2019, it was clearly over valued at that time, for the stage of development that they were then at, so it fell back for those reasons.

It has continued to be hammered daily for the last 18 months, and continues to be by the likes of helx to this day.....is that justified just because they don`t issue an RNS stating every ad campaign and a running total of revenues coming in?

JD was slaughtered for ramping the companies potential and prospects, and now he`s hammered for staying under the radar whilst operating with `quiet efficiency`!
He`s damned either way.

Well well, I do believe I hit a nerve with that one.

Yes he called it right, in amoungst his paymasters attacks, and the relentless venomous deramping on here everyday for 18 months by more than just him, the share price didn`t stand a chance. It was the obvious horse to back after such a rise.
But its his claim that he held shares all the way through that just sounds unbelievable. Its nonsense, it was just his modus operandi...claim to have bought shares but now worried, that old chestnut!
He`s paid for his Bids bashing as part of the orchestrated attack, as exposed by the article last year that showed the network of players involved.
TW spat his dummy and claimed to be lining up litigation proceedings only to go quiet on it and let it go cold....because he knew the author was correct.

Bids are battling on two fronts, building the programmatic IGA platform, and being attacked by the consortium of those with interests in the competitors in the space.
Helx is just a small cog in that wheel, albeit a relentless cog, but the character that he plays and the claims he makes don`t make any sense!
Maybe thats how his character is designed for him, confuse, disrupt, keep up the fear factor with quips like 2p incoming and all that fake news.

He was part of the orchestra `driving` the price down, not predicting it!

how come I've been correct for 18months then?

Ha ha, you`ve just nailed your coffin of credibility well and truly shut!
You continuously call a lower share price, correctly, but you don`t sell a single share that you claim to have bought!!!

You couldn`t make it up....well that is....you could actually, and have!
Priceless you are.

The loss of credibility is for claiming that you hold so many other company`s shares yet you never put your point of view in writing on any other discussion forum but this one....3375 times!
Not one word, not a smiley face after results, not a comment on any other share prices, up or down, not a bean, zero, zilch!!
I reckon a modern day 8 year old with only half a brain would question whether that was an authentic claim.
Its bowlokz, you know it, I know it, and everyone who hears of such a ludicrous claim would raise their eyebrows at it and wonder if there`s a punchline to follow!