Member Info for botbot1202

Hawi.
Yes, Yes, Yes and Yes.
and Yes re the Corporation Tax being 10%, BUT, then we have an offset of losses.
So IF Nano's portion ends up being £360m, then we will end up paying zero Corporation tax anyway.

The Companies wrong.
The companies given away everything.
It's only going to be 20p, it's only going to be 40p.
Has anyone actually read and listened to the guidance.?
If not, someone very kindly reposted it earlier today, and it tells you everything in that guidance.....
GLA.

It's now $10.27
A nice Jump in the morning unless something breaks out overnight.
At the moment, £0.18 Jump due in the morning, and hopefully climbing.

No, because any "settlement discussion" would be Without Prejudice, i.e. What we say here doesn't count, in simple/easy non legal language.

BBD.
Whatever the outcome, I'll buy you a beer in Runcorn. :-)

BBD.
Only because I used to jump onto the Nano board every day, earlier on used to post regularly, but in the last year haven't, but still read.
Trolling through 400 posts, all saying the same thing, asking the same questions, and coming out with 101 theories gets a bit boring after a while.
But, I would agree with you about the "end" though.

HH. I never said "soon", I said wait for 3 weeks.
or, to be exact, by the 5th February 2023.

BBD.
I expected better from a LTH.
You've been here long enough to know how all this works, especially with Nano.

Geeeezzzzz.
Who cares what it is today, who cares about interim RNS's, who cares about what's happening tomorrow.
The only time to care is when the official end RNS is out, the settlement is complete, and everyone knows exactly what they are getting and what the "deal" was.
From there you make a decision to Sell, or Hold, or Part Sell.
This board has gone from the best board across all Stock Holdings to a bunch of crying babies because everything wasn't detailed to the minute degree.
OMG. Wait, we've held for god knows how many years, who cares for the next 3 weeks.

It clearly says the lower end of the trail value, it clearly says Global, and it clearly says all past and all future.
Lower end for the US was always $120m ish (up to $180m), global would make that $360m ish for history, and that's up to 2021 only.
Future is at least double that, from 2022 onwards.
Unsure why everyone is crying, appreciate that maybe this isn't a 20x bagger now, or 10x bagger, but it's going to be a lot more than now.

THANK YOU.
Just picked up a few more at a nice low price compared to Friday's.
THANK YOU

So $250m from 2015 - 2021, so doubled for future, then this is only US, so trebled for world.
>>>>>>\Nanoco has not revealed its estimates of the potential payout if the litigation is successful, but has stated that since April 2015 Samsung had sold 14 million TVs deploying QDs based on Nanoco IP in the US. These TVs had an average sales price of US$2,200–2,500 compared with the average price of a top of the range TV without QDs of c US$1,000. The value of the lost revenue to Nanoco this represents has not been disclosed. Had the alleged patent infringement not taken place, we believe Nanoco would have collected royalties from its partners, primarily Dow Chemical, which would potentially be supplying QDs to Samsung in volumes higher than Nanoco could produce itself in Runcorn. If we assume that the cost of the QDs in each TV is equivalent to 10% of the uplift in price between QD and non-QD TV displays, and that Nanoco would have received a 12% royalty (as per our May 2017 initiation note) on these QDs, this represents US$14.4–18.0 in lost revenue per TV display or US$200–250m between April 2015 and the present This value excludes QDs in any future TV displays Samsung makes or TVs sold in other territories. We note that around one-third of Samsung’s TV sales are attributable to the US market.

Now I've made it look pretty as well.
and sorted all the avg's as well.
Close to my bed time now I'm old..........

Mr_Nakhla - 2,200,000
Peter10 - 2,000,000 + @ 35p avg
Troublesome - 2,000,000 @ 10p avg
Intrusive - 1,200,000
Mattyboy - 817,807 @ 16p avg
Gozzygiz - 675,000 @ 30p avg
NGR - 400,000 (or just 400)
Al_Truist - 360,000 @ 35p avg
Bagpuss - 285,000 @ 9p avg
Dwstudios - 262,000 @ 19p avg
Botbot1202 - 217,000 @ 12p avg.
SVTCOBRA - 200,000 @ 20p avg
Peregrinetrouser - 186,000 @ 37p avg
DND42 - 171412 @ 23.1p avg
HenryHistorian - 140,000
Xbb2008 - 122,000 @ 37p avg
NIDGM - 120,000 @ 60p avg
Ginodog - 120,000 @ 19p avg
Scrapiron - 100,000 @ 22p avg
Peexb - 80,000 @ 23p avg
Everbroke - 68,000 @ 28p avg
Morbox - 60,000 @ 18p avg
buzzfledderjohn - 60,000 @ 25p avg
LivLou - 50,000 @ 48.2p avg
BC - 50,000 @ 35p avg
Crisplex - 50,000
JBongo - 36,500 @ 23p avg
Rob_125 - 21,000
Rr101 - 1,115 @ 55p avg

gozzygiz

Mr_Nakhla - 2,200,000
Peter10 - 2,000,000 + @ 35p
Troublesome - 2,000,000 @ 10p avg
Intrusive - 1,200,000 shares
Mattyboy - 817,807 avg 16p
Gozzygiz - 675,000
NGR - 400,000 (or just 400)
Al_Truist - 360,000 @ 35p avg
Bagpuss - 285,000 @ 9p
Dwstudios - 262,000 @ 19p avg
Botbot1202 - 217,000 @ 12p avg.
SVTCOBRA - 200,000 @ 20p avg
Peregrinetrouser - 186,000 @ 37p avg
DND42 - 171412 @ 23.1p avg
HenryHistorian - 140,000
Xbb2008 - 122,000 @ 37p avg
NIDGM - 120,000 @ 60p avg
Ginodog - 120,000 @ 19p avg
Scrapiron - 100,000 @ 22p avg
Peexb - 80,000 @ 23p avg
Everbroke - 68,000 @ 28p avg
Morbox - 60,000 @ 18p avg
buzzfledderjohn - 60,000 @ 25p avg
LivLou - 50,000 @ 48.2p avg
BC - 50,000 @ 35p avg
Crisplex - 50,000
JBongo - 36,500 @ 23p avg
Rob_125 - 21,000
Rr101 - 1,115 @ 55p avg

Mr_Nakhla - 2,200,000
Peter10 - 2,000,000 + @ 35p
Troublesome - 2,000,000 @ 10p avg
Intrusive - 1,200,000 shares
Mattyboy - 817,807 avg 16p
NGR - 400,000 (or just 400)
Al_Truist - 360,000 @ 35p avg
Bagpuss - 285,000 @ 9p
Dwstudios - 262,000 @ 19p avg
Botbot1202 - 217,000 @ 12p avg.
SVTCOBRA - 200,000 @ 20p avg
Peregrinetrouser - 186,000 @ 37p avg
DND42 - 171412 @ 23.1p avg
HenryHistorian - 140,000
Xbb2008 - 122,000 @ 37p avg
NIDGM - 120,000 @ 60p avg
Ginodog - 120,000 @ 19p avg
Scrapiron - 100,000 @ 22p avg
Peexb - 80,000 @ 23p avg
Everbroke - 68,000 @ 28p avg
Morbox - 60,000 @ 18p avg
buzzfledderjohn - 60,000 @ 25p avg
LivLou - 50,000 @ 48.2p avg
BC - 50,000 @ 35p avg
Crisplex - 50,000
JBongo - 36,500 @ 23p avg
Rob_125 - 21,000
Rr101 - 1,115 @ 55p avg

Sammy88.
Yes, you are correct.
There is a difference though. Let's say that Samsung sell the screen/Dots to Sony for $500, we will get a $5-$8 license fee.
BUT, Sony comes directly to Nano, buys the Dots, and then makes the screens themselves, and we charge $10/$12 through the Runcorn manufacturing plant, our revenue doubles.

Intrusive.
Yep, waiting for Nano, so I can part exchange to a younger model (with obviously only 50% of my worth LOL)

JBongo.
Yes, assuming nobody is telling porkies, correct. We would need a very big seat for all of us as well LOL
Bagzy sitting on top.

Tomaaa
Whatever the settlement is, it's going to be three times what is in the papers, because the papers are only talking about US volumes, and the settlement should be Global (assuming BT keeps to his word).
Secondly the revenue for the future will be based on License fee's @ whatever rate.
Thirdly, and I have seen someone say that P/E future adjustment doesn't come into it, but it does in a serious way, is that even if we were to say that the future royalties are £50m a year, and even a very low P/E calculation of 5 (Tesla for example, even after the massive fall is still 35, at one stage it was 360)..... So a P/E of 5 would equate to another £250m value.
BUT...... The Key is the future of all other elements....
So Sony, for example, goes to Samsung today to get the Dots, but now Sony could come to Nano, because it's confirmed that Nano "own the dots", same with Apple, same with any/all screen/IT companies.
Signing a large future deal is now a lot more likely than ever before, as nobody would want to sign with Nano as potentially we were going bust, and the "Dots weren't ours" because Samsung had them and was flooding the market with them.
So everyone will get lets say £1.50 a share in 30 days, or £2 a share, or £2.50 a share, but the potential is a damn sight larger than that.

Intrusive.
She's watching Tele