Member Info for BOTAK

Appolagies ,,Thy this

https://www.motoring.com.au/hydrogen-v-solid-state-battery-evs-113228/

Hydrogen v solid-state battery EVs - motoring.com.au

Hydrogen v solid-state battery EVs - motoring.com.au
Feann Torr

As petrol and diesel cars are being legislated into extinction, there's a new war brewing…

“I think once you consider the lifecycle of both technologies, that will be the deciding factor of whether technology A or technology B gains ascendency.”

Major oil companies such as Shell and Total are backing hydrogen.

They have formed a global hydrogen council which also includes China Energy, JXTG Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation and several car-makers, including BMW Group, Daimler, Honda, Hyundai, Toyota, Great Wall Motors and Bosch.

With the might of big oil behind it and plenty of automotive brands in the mix, surely it’s a slam dunk for hydrogen cars?

It appeared that way 15 years ago but the advent of solid-state batteries could deliver a LeBron-like rejection and tip the scales in the favour of battery EVs.

The current liquid-based electrolyte chemistry of lithium-ion batteries, which are present in cars like the Tesla Model S, Nissan LEAF and Jaguar I-PACE, could soon be replaced with solid electrolytes.

the hydrogen fuel cell market is growing. By 2022, the market is estimated to be worth over $12 billion. And that should be noteworthy to investors.

Even though the hydrogen fuel cell vehicle market still lags far behind BEVs, any growing market can provide a good investment opportunity.

https://www.energyandcapital.com/articles/is-it-time-to-invest-in-hydrogen-fuel-cells-again/6402

He probably got it from IR jay,as would you ( I assume ) if you contacted them regards an imminent fundraise ,Does that help or give clarity to concerned shareholders SP @ 1.67 NOW ,7th June 2018 pre rns - 2.80 + or - a few 001,s , The market does not lie

karlo, Dont think Justin W is to blame for this or any other share tanking, I believe JW honestly thought and was fed a lot of the same information as lth and significant shareholders and possibly the majority of holders , What you say below " looks like we have all been had " must be a fair description of whats being gong on here , Ive commented on this subject soooo many times, But we still get caught in the net ! If a company and its BOD Past & Present have a long term agenda to shaft investors , it will only come to light when all funds have been filtered away,Im not saying for one minute this is applicable to Feedback PLC as there are a lot of retired directors and significant shareholders with a lot more skin in this than you or I, AIM is a circus , with a reverse performance in as the audience are the Muppet,s and the directors do all the laughing , Time will tell here if foul play has been part of the mix , TexRAD must be a highly lucrative piece of Kit and seems Cardan is also a valuable programme + the guys who created and working both those programs are ethical and are on top of there game Whats being going on behind the scenes , regards BOD playing the market remains to be seen

They dont give a flying feck Bob, The great unwashed are poo poo on the bottom of there Testoni,s Think 1.25 could well be the next dilution level,Although we are in danger here with that ambiguous rns , might be a while before they announce ,its another 7 trading days left for June , I hate to say this but WTF were they thinking releasing a statement like that,, @ best it was suicidaly grossly incompetent , It might even turn out to be corrupt , ??? Then what !

Whilst in theory ,shares in Lew of salary is an in -house promotion and installs confidence whilst the sp is rising and the company expects organic and minimum dilution,,, What scenario if AR & SS ( being privy to insider info , company financials and product progress ) on a falling or sideways decide they need some pocket money more often than not, It would be another TB rerun dual carriageway wise with no end , should there not be a sticky clause in that deal ,,, Or is there ?

I wish Amigo ! They dont call the local police ' constant Gardeners ' for nothing Get a sniff ,They Plant - then extract the $$ way to iffy ,even for me

England 0 Tunisia 6 Ho Ho H0 "You can stick yer feking chariot up yer A--- "

Agree with some of your view MH ,I think VRS are the best of whats on offer and Haydale need to promote the Talga connection, I stand to be corrected but IPO was 220p or 210p so only 33% of Float level

lucky actually you are one of the shareholders who know there stuff I refer to in the last post so cannot argue with your knowledge or VRS or Graphene in particular VRS is no doubt the run away leader in the Graphene sector in the uk How much money have VRS made off of Graphene sales ?

Hi Giovani Good Day Sir, I am no expert ,far from it ,But from an investors point of view the first differential is VRS have NANO its the real mcoy and they have THE most important aspect of a tie in to Manchester University the home of Graphene + Haydale functionalise there Graphene whereas VRS actually make the stuff to specification on order ,Neil Rickets comes across as a genuine honest guy , with a Dynamic hardworking ,ethical ethos who,s integrity thus far has been impeccable,A lot of investors who knew there shit did lots of dd on VRS and liked what they found so shoved lots and lots of $ into the company buying millions of shares @ 9p , IMO and its only an opinion Graphene is still a new concept and no sales of note have been achieved to date from any of the players,So despite all the excitement expectations over @ VRS it is hype for now The trouble with AIM is if a BOD /Founders directors have a plane from IPO ( haydale @ 210p) to milk the market ,They can sustain years of ( wishful thinking within there shareholder base ) tapping the market with placements ,flipping - more placements with bullshit rns purely designed to keep the PI,s thinking the product is the dog,s testicles and the sp will multibag with ambiguous content , Whereas the truth is kept under wraps until its too late but by that time the CEO,s and there crony,s will have filtered the $ into there swiss accounts, Not saying that is Haydale but RG knew the company needed to demostare revenues to keep tapping the market and I assume thats what the US M&A was for Just my thoughts Gio

PowerHouse Energy have there beady eye on that type of Hydrogen direct Supply with there G3 UHT.s " on the premises "

Morning Guy,s & Gal,s When they proposed the placing in April 17 ,I contacted IR and some directors to suggest they raise via the "Primary Bid " method of open fund raising but I got some blag on inciting institutional and the PB was not suitable ( probably too fair & just ), However they choose not to ! Personally I have no conflict with the BOD taking up discounted shares as they can always issue options to themselves, Id be pacified further if they gave a breakdown on which direction the funds will be directed but working on past knowledge only the chosen few will be privy Receiving the whole World Cup on Indonesian tv with English commentary, So nice bonus there , Just a shame Cymru are not in attendance Whatever is decided over the next few months I hope Mr DC gives existing shareholders a fair bite of the cherry and consideration to the damage inflicted on confidence and pressure absorbed over the last 12 months of TB,s drip selling and CE debacle ,But Somehow me thinks not ! C,mon Tunisia

Had high hopes forvtis company few years back ,Visited Ammanford met the management spoke to the then Chairman a while did a tour of facility's etc , They were always struggling to bring in the $ so had to expand to Thailand & USA ,Bit of a costly gamble + risking IP with China JV , Such A shame bit tits up it is Im afraid

Personally I think the BOD should be applauded for burn rate ,They need to establish a market and a revenue generating pipeline, not an easy achievement on a tight budget,CEO ,needs to get down Westminster and promote and canvas the people in power on ITM,s mission in green and grab those grants

Took another 5K or so ,Building a position here for the long run, The poster below mentioned electric re-charging Who or what entity will supply free electric on the scale needed to charge vehicles on the scale of predicted growth + the time on the forecourt is not feasible, OK The cost involved to lay down the infrastructure to supply and store hydrogen to the forecourt is imminence but doable with HMG / Green Grants and scale of project should reduce overheads ITM are progressing on 3 fronts I actually thought the financials very encouraging

Nothing wrong or unrealistic about being optimistic or bullish over ITM.as long as its calculated and realistic and not just figures plucked out of the air for a rampathon, imo ramping blag just put,s potential incoming into another stocks coffers Very informative, amicable, decent level headed poster board here and long may it continue ,Thanks to all for excellent contributions

Appreciate you sharing your thoughts, The shell jv is an indication of heavy duty institutional wanting a slice of the action , Should Hydrogen fulling stations morph into a nationwide infrastructure then it would have to be managed and underwritten by the likes of Shell although the above is a feasible scenario , Gas storage , renewable s to gas to storage to feedstock is also prominent A unicorn eh in 7 years ?? Hope we TO way before that @ a 500% premium on today's SP

Spice Your 20.21 post ,One would assume the logic in - One assumes that such an increase will mean falling costs. Falling costs will hopefully mean a quicker up take. + HMG,s " clean Air London initiative + emergence of more economical hydrogen technology + industry and market awareness of the viability in renewable s That ITM are " Right Place / Right Time " Should that be the case and on the back of growing European expansion & distribution on all levels , At what level do posters visualize ITM,s market cap to be in 12 -18 months or what are expectations of ROI ?