Member Info for BoomerBower

Newboy I am far more learned on the topic than you which is why you haven't disputed one fact, but instead have chosen to smear rather than debate. I have read extensively on the subject and share the view of nobel laureate Ivar Giaever on the matter who is of the view it's a hoax. Now is this nobel winner not a scientist? I thought all scientists agreed? Science works theorem/proof, radiative forcing hasn't been proven, the current models assume it's a column and use assumptions about water vapour that confound known science. Therefore the radiative forcing theorem isn't proven science at all or even close to it, but merely an unproven theory. Unproven things like the Riemann hypothesis have far more evidence, not that an idiot like you would know what that is.

Not all scientist agree on radiative forcing and if you think they do you are an idiot! But professor David Bellamy and many other eminent physicists know much less than newboy lol. Note you don't dispute any of the facts lol, you just outsource your thinking to the guardian lol.

Tfe it's king Canute syndrome. For all those who buy the brain wash I repeat we are in a deepening ice age that began 2.8m years ago. Our civilisation has thrived in an inter glacial period thanks to their retreat only 20k years ago. Co2 is a lag factor so cannot possibly be the driver of earth's climate, more over it's an essential gas for life on earth without which we would all be dead. That's science ridiculous forecasts claiming the planet will boil aren't.

Callisto think I've rocked newboys tiny brain that we are in an ice age, he probably thought the planet was about to boil because of this ridiculous climate alarmism. He probably think co2 is "really bad" when it's an essential gas for life and plants would like it at least twice as high as the current level. Some ppl like newboy are easily brain washed, he's a classic "button pusher" in the milgram experiment.

Newboy if you think radiative forcing the farago on which co2 theory wrests is settled science you aren't familiar with the method. But you are ok you have the guardian to tell you what to think. Lucky boy.

For your info we are in an a depending ice age that started 2.8 milion years. We have had periodic glaciations every 100k years driven by sun cycles. 20000 years ago Montreal was under 2k thick ice sheets. Likely it will be again in 80000 years. That's science but you believe your silly theory about plant food even though it lags temperature so cannot possibly be responsible.

Ridiculous piece on climate change in channel 4 newd, idiot reporter next to a glacier. Apparently some great surprise it's melting a bit in summer. The so called scientist then goes on to claim record breaking climate change in the south pole. Unfortunately the data shows a marginal cooling trend at the south pole since 1960. Very unsurprising the urban heat island
effect is negilgable at the pole
hence no warming is observed at all. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169809512002256

Mrs N why crow about Smith then adopt politics that are totally in opposition to his writings. It's lacks any reason, accountability it intellectual consistency. It's like me praising Marx.

Sorry to lower the tone Bruce.

Butd there is only 1 g in investing. Sharpen your tool a bit I'd suggest.

You keep talking in your little echo box newboy or bring some evidence.

So you would, water finds its own level doesn't it.

Not really the bluster us all on the EU side. We don't need them half as much as they think. Very little evidence the economy is screwed btw. None in fact.

Bruce if the fate of humanity wrested on you producing offspring with sturgeon could you? I'd pass and let humanity die out.

No it'll go well up under no deal as uncertainty ends.

Snige you don't half talk drivel. Trade comes about through competitive advantage as we have seen with trump with china it's next to impossible for a politician to change that with tariffs. We should therefore cease to worry about whether others are stupid enough to punch their own nose with tariffs and just drop our own. In every case in all history dropping tariffs has created far more jobs and economic than is destroyed. We should not empower politicians to negotiate trade at all since their only sanction is punishing their own ppl since protectionism rarely succeeds, idiotic or what!

Haha Bruce maybot thought she knew it all.

A1 Corbyn a sick perve, one for bedding abbot, two for showing off about it, three for offering her up to his lefty mates.

As I've said before judge a man by the women he goes for. Dianne Abbot say it all about JC, he scraping the barrel if he thinks that's worth tapping. Same with Major and Currie. As for veradker he's definitely an English hating creep who is eager to brown any eurocrat.

If it's up to veradker the cloth will be cut on the seat of his pants.

Yes crowcast cause the market never got a thing wrong did it. Saw the sub prime crisis a mile off didn't it along with the BoE. And the FTSE was always worth 2800 when it got down there?? Once independent things will be on the up again and soon.