Member Info for BoomerBower

Snige what planet are you on? 39bn ain't a good deal when you owe nothing! It what happens when ******ed remainers take over a negotiation they don't understand. The EU must be pissing themselves with laughter at the gullibility and stupidity of our civil service.

Born and Troajan show me the legal basis for 39bn? Marriage is a legal contract. There is no legal contract for this divorce bill the legal advice to HMG and the lord's is completely clear. We owe nowt! Even the guardian agree on that.

Put it another way. The mcap of Lloyd's is about 39bn. The government has essentially given away the equivalent of our biggest bank to the EU for nothing. In case you ever doubted our ruling class weren't thick and utterly clueless. We done Theresa you utter fraud. I thought she was just a liar, sadly she's a stupid one.

Get it through yr thick head we don't owe 39bn. There is no legal obligation and no debt. This is a payment to curry favour and nothing more.

And Troajan the Eurotunnel has nothing to do with the EU. It was built by private money, the investors lost their shirts. God bless Maggie she refused to waste public money on it unlike the current morons in power have with HS2.

You said we were legally obliged to pay, we aren't. And you can't default on a debt you have no legal contract to pay. The 39bn is the equivalent of leaving a tip at a bar. Sheer idiocy.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/04/uk-could-quit-eu-without-paying-a-penny-say-lords

Rot Troajan! The house of Lords itself, a remainers fraternity, has said legally we owe nowt! Stop lying please.

Troajan if you want to pay 39bn to add to 500bn wasted write the cheque. Count me out though cheers.

No May has created this problem by giving away 39bn and not leaving as instructed.

Th only thing we have to fear is fear itself. May is yellow.

Legally we don't need to pay the EU either Asperger but the civil service feel they need to leave a 39bn tip on the way out. The legal advice comes from the lord's, we owe nothing.

Snige are they slaves in Hong Kong and Singapore? To say capitalism was like slavery in Victorian times is ridiculous. Ppls living standards improved hugely in that period. The poor living standards were because they started in a place of serfdom at the start of the industrial revolution as mostly peasant farmers. Same as what has happened in China since 1976 by rejecting Maoism 10 of millions have been lifted from leftist inflicted. poverty. The same Maoism ppl like you want to inflict on us with Corbyn.

And A1 Ur a lovely chap but if you think about it yr really argueing for some odd form of homeopathy when it comes to trade with the EU. Why arent we giving cash away to China and us if paying for trade is such a cracking idea? No the fools in the treasury need to stop sending them anymore cash.

I think ppl are not using their heads if they think this deal is worth paying 39bn none of which we are legally obliged to pay anyway. We operate on wto with China and usa, 2 largest economies on earth, and there is zero reason we can't do this with EU. We even run a large surplus with USA under WTO!!! And before ppl get too distressed it's a 2.8% mean tariff and besides we run a 70bn deficit with EU. Just because some idiot politicians agree a trade deal doesn't mean you get traders, you need product to sell in the first place. This appalling trade deal is a direct payment from every worker in the UK of around 1500 going out of the country and never retutning, total madness. Just imagine what 39bn could do for infrastructure here. Why parliament is determined to waste 39bn after we've already frittered away 500bn on the EU is beyond me. Good money after bad!

No the beauty of parliament not coming to a deal is no deal brexit. Happy days!!!

Seifart has no arguments LTI don't waste yr breath.

Seifart let's have a hard brexit and then ppl like you will have to chew humble pie when our economy booms. I bet you were peddling this nonsense about black weds, euro membership and y2k bug.

If May was PM during that conflict she'd probably decide to scuttle her own navy rather than sink theirs.

General belgrano was a sad loss of life. It did however keep the Argentinian naval fleet in base for the war. A hard decision but one that saved many many BRITISH lives. Maggie a great lady that protected bristish soldiers before Argentinian ones. That's called doing great job.