The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
While some question is ggp worth the wait I'll continue to top us as and when funds allow , that's my answer to the question anyway.
all the politics , all the waiting , all the reading of discussions , all the entry's to the green coffin club, the you tube channels and the ggp chat group both of good intrest to me.
To sell now when the s p is where it is and production in comparison of how long I have held Is now round the corner , with a potential of rich news period for the remainder of 2023 , to even consider questioning is ggp worth hanging onto isn't even in my thought process.
I made that descion when I invested in ggp that i will stick around till the very least 2025-2026 , when we are in production. Me moving on from here now will be a complete failure in my investment and a failure on the descions why I invested in the first place.
Share price moves up and down , and as long as fthe fundamentals remain all I have to do is be patient, and I intend to do just that
Well you have got your wish by the seems of things.
I still believe those attending the symposium will have a way of buying pow shares which was my point. Rambert you are talking about the type of people who don't jist throw in a grand.
I'm from the UK so maybe my knowledge on u.s Brookers isn't great , still doesn't change my opinion , maybe yours isn't perfect either your info comes from American colleagues who I agree will know more then me.
Why would there be significantly less buying opportunities , if someone from the US has paid to attend the symposium im pretty sure they will be able to also buy pow shares.
the only thing that might be a inconvenience is the trading times here will be different in the states due to time difference, but buying POW shares should be no different then me buying tesla shares on the NASDAQ or AMC on the NYSE
Is it really necessary for Orion to explain himself, I'm certainly not interested in what they have to say , this isn't a lithium stock and I highly doubt Rupert Verco and the rest of the board care either.
the moment we give idiots like Orion the time of day they win the first battle and that's by getting engagement, they then continue to spout nonsense hoping others will further engage in argument by defending their investment.
in the meantime the forum becomes more and more less appealing to others and more and more appealing to schoolkids trolls or whatever you wanna call them
Excuse the spelling , should of re read first, I'm typing at the same time as working , but looks like a child has typed it
Has this been posted
Not a lot im affraid , but ill have to relread as only had eyes on for 2 secs bit diesnt it suggest it could also be a lositive suspension. Appoligies if already listed and debated in , if so just move on lol
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://kalkinemedia.com/au/stocks/lithium/leo-lithium-shares-haltered-ahead-of-anticipated-government-announcement&ved=2ahUKEwidx4Dux52AAxXQzQIHHRTSBV8QxfQBKAB6BAgKEAI&usg=AOvVaw238K0ctFBLJAfcTFoTDyWE
How's thread such as johnny pc!!! beneficial for this forum in anyway , same as other threads of the same ilk
If anyone buys shares based on what rampers say then they shouldn't be investing
If anyone sells shares based on what trolls say they shouldn't be investing.
Balanced posters and genuine holders/investors can normally read between the lines.
this encourages school ground behaviour 99% of the forum don't want to read or are not interested in reading.
All it shows are some are too emotionally attached to their investments
How's this thread beneficial for this forum in anyway.
If anyone buys shares based on what rampers say then they shouldn't be investing
If anyone sells shares based on what trolls say they shouldn't be investing.
Balanced posters and genuine holders/investors can normally read between the lines.
Starting threads like this encourages school ground behaviour 99% of the forum don't want to read or are not interested in reading.
All it shows are some are too emotionally attached to their investments
Rotter has hard as it is , if you think someone here is to cause trouble it's best to ignore them.
You tell us what we know already appears from nowhere but then make a massive mistake by asking that person a question.
All that does mate is force engagement and creates more conversation of potentially a agenda to create doubt and cause havoc.
Your thread heading which is a little dramatic isn't quite in line with the actual thread, so unsure in your agenda.
I would argue this is also for a Leo lithium forum.
Although I would be interested to see what the news is considering Leo lithium is compared to kod a lot here and how the bulls and bears think it will effect us l.
I'm guessing positive Leo news means the comparisons will be great.
Negative Leo news ot won't even be discussed.
People with a balanced view will prob read between the lines
A re- rate because pow are speaking at a symposium????
Geeeez
You normally define a placing sees the s.p drop to the placing offer , maybe slightly lower , there's always room to get in on the action while it stabilise and moves back up
OK so I may of got a little confused rereading your post by the way you used the term value.
You used it as current good value as in a buy , I read it that if Leo is x amount we should be the same as we have similarities.
When you reply could market cap has nothing to do with number of shares in issue and that its irrelevant is prob why a few eyebrows were raised.
I wouldn't say you were completely ridiculed, I started my message with excuse my ignorance.
I still stand by my comment that if leo was having a tough time no comparison would of even been made , I would argue the comparisons only started when Leo had a big rise , why not before , that's down to opinion I guess , jist like the majority of comments here including this one
The number of shares have absolutly no relevance to a market cap or the value of a company ???????
Excuse my ignorance , I'm unsure how a company with 17x less shares then kod , I'm sure different debts and different in terms of where they are as a company can be compared.
I'm pretty sure if Leo was struggling right now it wouldn't be used as a comparison
Pd101 when you compare market caps is it not important to show how many shares both company's have.
Do you have that info to share to the forum, how many kodal have compared to Leo
14.9p very specific valuation and timeline
Does someone want to tell me what that amounts to as a market cap with our shares in issue at that time providing no more dilution.
Just seen carnival hit 13 quid a share.
I left at 10.65 making great profits, after results thought I might get back in , clearly not lol.
Of course Hindsight I bailed wrong time , but congratulations to the ones that stuck at it even after results.
Can't buy a bean but loading up as many as you can ??????
Said same thing many times on your posting history pd , this guy has 10k a month to spend.
You said same bout prem and look how that turned out.
There's a lot of dangerous trolls about , there's also a lot of dangerous subtle posts like this thread. Posting history is available to all
Johnny I'm not currently invested here , have been twice and made some good money, I pop on here to see if any devolpments and when or if I see a opportunity to buy in again.
My question , apart from trying to antagonise , cause trouble and create doubt what's the purpose of your post.
Because in all honesty anyone that decides to buy on positive posts and sell on negatives like yourself shouldn't be invested, what's happining at prem has nothing to do with here , my opinion is funding will be secured imminently and you of course will be long gone.
Again that's my opinion on a opinion based forum.