Member Info for bon_scott

Well said Hexam. I think it is very reasonable from an investor's perspective to request that a listed company be run transparently and on the up-and-up.

Likewise Fed, I appreciate your previous analysis of the company's financial position, and your level of confidence that it will continue to be solvent. That it a highly significant determination versus a year ago.

We all want to see the business improve, the calamities to cease, and the sly deception to stop. The management are the only ones who can deliver that.

I notice none of the pumpers dare address Coasty's questions with meaningful answers...

Personally, I think the comparisons with Next need to stop. Real Madrid versus the Dog & Duck. With Next, we're talking about a properly run company, which we certainly can't say about this lot. Do Next hide part of their business to make the annuals and interims look better?

"Watch the likes of south coast disappear shortly along with his other aliases. She will convert to a long narrative under new aliases. Seen it all before 100’s of times."

Something tells me you know rather a lot about reappearing under new aliases, Mr Humphreys.

Or maybe not. Or maybe never, what with this lot viewing reporting and communicating as optional.

"Are you genuinely that thick southcoast?

They are enabling the sale of customer data with the PLT brand. Makes it far more profitable"

Ha ha, OK, if you say so tradey...

Here, since this is such a gem, see if you can find our dear "investment" in the This Is Money dirt cheap tips for 2026. Maybe not though, because bonuses and share awards will always come before any dividend:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/article-15432859/Dirt-cheap-British-stocks-tipped-experts-soar.html

So the article is pessimistic, I observed that it is pessimistic, you then stuck your oar in to state that it is pessimistic. Well you are just an absolute genius! Finger right on the pulse. An investing oracle 👌

"Interesting that you choose to post a link that simplywallst refer to as a pessimistic view.

New year same old uninvested troll I guess"

Wow, that's a reactive, angry retort. Always on a weekend too. Why is that, tradey?

Anything useful to add to the debate I wonder? Perhaps you could start by answering coasty's very straightforward question...

Not looking overly good. Put simply, everyone is setting up marketplaces and using AI. No service differentiator, and certainly no quality advantage form the youth brands (tat factor). If profits are to come, they appear to be 2yrs away at least. Shouldn't have gone blasting money all over the place without a plan during the boom years!

Potential for 60p fair value long-term, but an equally justifiable 11p if badly executed (which the management have substantial form for).

https://simplywall.st/community/narratives/gb/retail/aim-debs/boohoo-group-shares/tmanhiat-update-for-boohoo-group

"Well I have taken the opportunity to top up a few more, as I see very good news coming soon. And the fact that a number of doom and gloom mongers are very hard at work, tells me I am making the right call."

Well done o jog on, good for you. Let's talk again when this goes sub 20 in the next few weeks.

Hi pooppipe, have you found that proof yet? I'll give you a while longer matey, keep looking 👌

"Bon Scott, just to show you for the liar you are, here is what you posted. I'll ask again how do you know that they are "now selling"?"

Still trying to twist and deflect. Fortunately anyone with a brain can see that "now that Frasers are selling" is in no way the same as "Frasers are now selling". Take it easy, tradey boy.

Oh hi, pooppipe69.

"Why you and the other alias’s of yours, never answer any challenges?"

What aliases? Care to show some proof? As for my answer, the RNS clearly proves Frasers selling of late. Note that tradey swerved around the observation that if market makers were so corrupt, they'd have been hyping the price so Frasers could offload. Instead comes the twisting and deflection to deal with the embarrassment. Naughty naughty!

Since you're so focused on your quest for truth, how about tradey's baseless multi-year whinging that the price was being held down for Frasers? Note that you aren't demanding any proof there, are you? 😉

"How do you know Frasers are selling bon Scott"

Ha ha, you're losing it, tradey. So consumed by rage that you can't even read an RNS.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/DEBS/tr-1-notification-of-major-holdings-zjs3z64x78sjy4e.html

You're welcome!

Deluded little pumpers, all caught on a spike and looking for someone to blame. Oddly claiming market maker manipulation for the share price crashing to 10p, despite Frasers having all but stopped buying as of May this year. They don't really think these things through!

Tradey is trapped at almost 400p so his desperation is understandable. What's your excuse, pooppipe59? 😉

Industrial-scale denial going on here by the pumpers. Never stopped hearing about how the share price was being held down by market makers so Frasers could mop up. Wouldn't the share price be inflated by those very same market makers, now that Frasers are selling?

Absolute tripe. Wake up, the lot of you 😂

"Is BFD/T4G denying his prior T4G existence ? No question but BS carries more credibility !"

Absolutely right, johnhume. Still trying to pretend that he isn't trading4good. Exactly the same arrogant entrenchment, prose and inability to see the objective reality of this stock. Takes not only his detractors, but also his allies on here for absolute fools.

"Yet you haven't sold your pretend shares

That is really difficult to understand"

So no meaningful response or contribution tradey? Imagine everyone's surprise! 👍

The company is still loss-making, revenue is contracting at an alarming rate and multiple persons/organisations have remarked that the company may be running out of cash runway. The PLT sale so far appears only to be rhetoric. This is why the sentiment is negative. Not sure why this is so difficult to understand.

Coasty does seem to have posed a question which none of the deluded pumpers can answer. Least of all the old bill on the board. This is: how the massive year-on-year youth brands revenue decline is supposed to be compensated for by £20M from Debenhams, and even then, a large proportion of that £20M is itself booked from the ever-dwindling youth brands revenue.