Member Info for BobsSocks

"Me socks, firstly your link to disassociative disorder is basically what you do by hiding behind a keyboard and separating your real life from the pretend one you live on this board 🤔 quite ironic don't you think?"

Nice thought. I guess we all get to play amateur psychologist. My excuse is I was hunting for a word that describes an attempt to disrupt the flow of a conversation by interjecting with irrelevance and my brane came up dissociative. I was forced to look it up and decided my subliminal mind got it right.

As to the difference between the methods I was basing my thoughts on the video by FG in which he describes the three methods as being AI based and finding patterns within SHA256. You appear to be describing something different but I can understand why both of us might be confused given the inconsistent messaging.

https://twitter.com/QBTOfficial256/status/1722524469409747282

Note to @Putuq Sorry about your inability to cope with concepts not involving hammers and screws requiring multiple words to discuss them. Why don't you just filter me as advised by others. You can also report me for hurting your head. However it is not my fault that you have it stuck in the cupboard.

In terms of the possible flaw in my thinking SHA256 produces a 256 bit digest as its output but the size of its input is not similarly limited. That's 2^255 different numbers, 5.77x10^76, and as such there must be different inputs that will produce collisions, it's just not very probable. That might give QBT the opportunity to claim three different methods might find three different inputs that give the same, required, output. Enid Blyton, The Famous Five. Tolstoy, War and Peace. Penthouse, August 1975 (just the articles). I might have that back to front.

@Jez I'm not so sure that race tracks or race drivers is an appropriate analogy in this particular case. It might be appealing for the sake of simplicity or for Jeremy Clarkson fans but the race track is SHA256 so everyone has to use the same one. Once you put something in at the start things are in the laps of the algorithm Gods. Everyone purportedly gets the same entry onto the track and, it would appear, everyone ends up with the same differing finish lines.

This is an enquiring mind question although I'm certain that some members would prefer not to discuss the thought and will instantly go off on their favourite dissociative rant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissociative_disorder

However,

QBT suggest that they have three independently developed AI methods, A, B and C, that spot patterns within SHA256 in order to direct the search for the golden hash. However since at any one time there can only be one answer (the flaw in my thinking may lie here) then it might be reasonable to expect that all three, or any number of, methods will point in the same direction.

If so then what is the point of having three?

Https://www.coindesk.com/price/bitcoin/

Certainly would not want to be out of QBT tomorrow, the day after or the day after or on Friday or the weekend given the massive correlation, trust me stupid people that's statistics, between the price of Bitcoin and the price of QBT. As you may also be aware we are due The Halving which is The Second Coming. Beware of Jehovah's Witnesses appearing in a forum near you trying to get in at a lower price.

Nice

"Canadian based Bitfarms, publicly traded under NASDAQNDAQ and TSX, has placed an assertive bet on the future of bitcoin mining. The firm purchase order of 35,888 Bitmain T21 miners, with deliveries slated for the first half of 2024, is not just a routine expansion. It's a bold stride into the future of bitcoin mining. Priced at $2,660 per unit, these miners represent the pinnacle of mining technology, offering unprecedented efficiency and power.

What makes this move particularly noteworthy is Bitfarms’ option to acquire an additional 28,000 Bitmain T21 miners. This potential expansion could elevate the company’s operational capacity to a staggering 17 EH/s and 391 MW during the second half of 2024. In an industry that is as competitive as it is volatile, such a significant increase in capacity and efficiency is not just an upgrade—it's a game-changer."

35K888 at $2660 a pop is a CAPEX of $84.46 Million.

These idiots could have reduced that by 2.6 if they used the QBT £2 Million placing solution that is presently being built and might work. The level of stupid is incomprehensible. Why blow that amount of money when QBT have reverse hacked the Bitmain Machines so they are better according to QBT. I mean, seriously, are these numpties bothered about the warranties on $85 Million. worth of kit?

Probably trying to get in at a lower price.

"BobsSocks

Simple solution............ filter JB"

Why? So I can gain Kudo Points for announcing it and then, assuming I stick to it, get called for peeking. It's all part of the Jambo Bingo Card.

I might miss being accused of boiling Kittens alive at the 10p a post paid-for hedge funds Christmas jolly.

I mean like... Jambone recently claimed Bobcat was lying about their trades, having also suggested it was bad form to ask others about their trades, then claimed they had sold and bought at...

"Bobprat, my Average is very low as bought clp days 0.20 -0.25 area sold a majority 1st rise to 4.4p and then bought back in with profit and took my initial investment out and some which I have said many times, so why do you need to lie?"

However, and this may not be exact, when I look at the SP history I do not see it ever getting to 4.4p unless we are talking about the heady days when things rose to £1.20 but why would you dump at 4.4p. It's all very strange. After that it does not appear to have got to 4.4p but perhaps they got a special deal.

Would this justify me calling Jambone a liar or should I just settle on an addled mind interpretation out to prove a vacant point with added large third leg.

"'why do people need to tell lies for a trade'

What lies have been told presuming everyone you accuse of trading is actually a trader? I'm not talking about opinions you don't agree with or mistakes, I'm talking actual lies you have examples of"

I am also would like to know this having been called a liar myself directly or indirectly, along with all the other cruft that forms part of the Bingo Card.

Comments from possible co-conspirators also appreciated.

More Jambone Bingo...

"Bobcat, I don’t recall Suthy ever mention what his average was, not sure what it has to do with anyone but himself tbf."

"You on the other hand said you were happy as you bought back in at 2.7p when it dropped from 3.7p so how’s you average chum?"

Https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2611321/Documents

20 November 2023 E-mail

https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Document/ApplicationNumber/GB2113962.1/f30bbe02-04ad-4224-bea4-1a6dfe28e362/GB2611321-20231120-Email.pdf

Skin of teeth. The deadline was 21st November.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/manual-of-patent-practice-mopp/section-117b-extension-of-time-limits-specified-by-comptroller

People trying to get in at a lower price and not answering silly questions?

"Wrong Bob,"

What happened to Bobsucks? Have you finally realised you are not going to get a blowjob by demanding one?

"only knocking the negative tripe posters,"

You mean those who have differing opinions and refuse to fellate you as well?

"Are it’s simple really, if you don’t like the company move on,"

OK. I don't like the company but better than that. I don't like you and the way you behave towards others and myself.

"but 220 posts desperately trying to knock QBT and even writing letters to the patent office is pretty Fecked up imho, what sort of person does that🤯"

That's your actions possibly causing the company collateral damage. I get to write letters to The Patent Office and they accept and publish them because I can, the facility is provided and accessible and am capable of doing so in a coherent way.

Do you want me to write them another one advising that despite the query from the examiner,

https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Document/ApplicationNumber/GB2113962.1/16b26341-fe3a-444f-9221-3f1901aa4961/GB2611321-20230921-Exam%20report%20%20Standard.pdf

about the possibility of double patenting they have proceeded to continue their action via the PCT without asking the UK Patent Office to withdraw. Outside of procedure there is a thing known as common courtesy. Why should the UK Patent Office waste their resources on this when the company has moved it to a higher authority?

"JamFloppyTodger, 398 posts in the last 30days knocking everyone else and their opinions , how very Odd, some very odd people that post on these boards for sure🤯"

RE: Too Close to News... Today 18:40

"Yep I agree it’s close to news. Snips slating someone else part.

I see what you did there. Only quote part of the message to imply that was the only part and ignore the rest. Then accuse someone else of being a liar and as obvious as yourself. It's a good job you don't have a split personality otherwise you would spend all of your time accusing yourself of being yourself. Oh Wait. Hold that thought.

"Everyone has there own view..."

Excellent. Do you mind if I express one even though it might be a bit glass half empty?

There is no indication of News, imminent or otherwise. Only a possible promise of News largely repackaged and impacted into short FOMO timescales by others possibly biased expectations, desires or hopes.

There you go. It is a view. I expressed it. Presumably that was in some way not allowed.

I really should not do this but... I'll use the wrong words but this looks like it's set up to be a Battle Royale. There you go, wrong words.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_royal

Oh. Hang on. "Within combat sports and professional wrestling, the term has a more specific meaning." I'll take that to mean between two people.

Being a new kid on the block I do not know too much about one of the, recently returned, combatants but the other one has, in my view, demonstrated all of the attributes he is presently accusing the returner of showing. It seems to be standard practice for this person.

Seems like a good start. When accused of being something by someone point out to them that that's they are. "See that you just called me? That's you that is."

Also may not apply,

https://constantrenewal.com/steel-man

"Bobsocks, my comment to bobcat was sent in jest and I'm sure it was received as such, not poking."

Apologies for that one. RibbingPoking. Jest would have been the better word.

Https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/bobcat1/

https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/jambone/

"Bobcat, you seem to have bought your fixation with me back, I thought I you might have had time to seek some help?"

BobCat1 in Reply to a prod by Addison RE: Hive announcement Today 10:57

Jambone in response to Bobcat RE: Hive announcement Today 11:02

So. Who has the fixation here?

I'll possibly be wrong but I predict that next up the link will be made between two people who have Bob in their usernames with accusations of them being the same multiply registered posters attacking the non-fixated one. We already have the accusation that we are upticking each others posts. Big hint I uptick posts I agree with or a source of insight or a chuckle.

Continually asks others whether they are invested or not and attacks any response or lack thereof.

Continually snipes at others about their holding in other companies.

Continually asks others about their holdings in QBT and trading history.

Warns other not to do this.

Continuously snipes about posting histories then questions them as if something might be amiss.

Suggests others should change their views and ways never changing his own.

Calls others liars and directly, or indirectly, of being paid agents.

To top it off. Suggests should now be civil.

Sure. How long will that last until he starts accusing people of being himself again?

@Jez

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/investor-relations/regulatory-news

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/RNS_-_30_Nov_2021_-_5nm_ASIC_NDA.pdf

However, as others have mentioned...

https://news.bitcoin.com/samsungs-3nm-gaa-chip-discovered-in-microbts-next-gen-bitcoin-mining-rig/

There has also been mention of 2nm processes in the pipeline.

Given I appear to be in a Chemist mode tonight may I also recommend Derek Lowe for a bit of light, explosive or otherwise mind expanding reading,

https://www.science.org/blogs/pipeline

However the point is QBT kicked the can down the road from 7nm to 5nm. They still have not done it. Now 3nm is here are they going to kick the can down the road again. Then having done that does the next grace saving can kick down to 2nm for more delays?

I shall tell you this. I very much doubt that whatever silicon architecture improving whizzy stuff QBT thinks they have and might gain a patent on I very much doubt they have employed any Business Centric Harvard Alumni with even a basic clue about how to lay out this stuff and if their method is the method to rule all methods they should have done it at 60nm then let someone else shrink it for them rather than wasting all of their time, and your money, kicking a 440ml can of secret recipe Coca Cola down the road.

Come on clever anti-troll trolls. Where in this RNS, other than the can kicking,

https://quantumblockchaintechnologies.co.uk/images/RNS_-_30_Nov_2021_-_5nm_ASIC_NDA.pdf

can you find anything that suggests the companies technology will be faster or lower power at 5nm other than a statement that 5nm is faster or lower power? It's another nothing.