Member Info for bluemango

So if you really believe that's what Kuat is doing, it's frustrating as a holder but only really an issue if you're a forced seller at a timing you wouldn't have chosen. Otherwise not an issue?

Whether it not that's what Kuat's game is, I'm content that there are enough other factors and value in the existing assets that should in fairness see this at a higher valuation in due course.

So if you believe that's what Ku

I've always seen investing in small caps like this, as akin to joining a team that should in theory all be in the same side but you discover they're actually running about in different directions.

All with varying timings, patience, targets and understanding.

Jimmy, to be fair to Clive, they might well argue that many shareholders don't fully understand the strategic objectives that may seem crystal clear to him and Kuat.

Thanks somm, makes sense.

The need for shareholder approval being the clincher.

Somm, I'm confused, aren't the heads of terms announced today different from the sale and purchase agreement (expected 30 Sept)?

Therefore, aren't the 12 million first tranche monies due in five working days, ie Tues 10 Sept?

News potential: Off the scale in terms of variety of sources, excitement and possible impact.

Current credibility as perceived by the market: close to zero.

The perfect combination for any risk-comfortable punters out there ....

Yes, only showing Boltazhan's because he's part of the Oraziman holding.

But no argument that they need to consistently show 3% holders as well, not just in annual accounts but also on website.

Looking at AIM definition of significant shareholdings, looks like they quickly need to review this and show 3% and above.

If AK still has his 79m then that's reassuring, especially as with that name he's likely to be Kazakh national and therefore as close to anyone about what's going on and to come.

I'll take that as a compliment.

So now who can't take a joke.

Belles, if you knew me you'd realise I'm the complete polar opposite of 'woke'.

Apologies to all for off topic.

Maybe, but with autism in my own family I'm particularly aware of misconceptions and misunderstandings around things like difficulty with eye contact etc. So perhaps less willing to see the 'funny side' of comments suggesting it's anything to do with trust. And I'm serious that this could be the explanation in this particular case.

'Think' not 'tick', obviously

Belles, did you even bother to read my post with likely explanation, before coming out with your 'sign of a liar' nonsense?

I really wish some would stop and tick before posting.

Or are the clumsy attempts at spreading FUD intentional?

Not saying this is necessarily the reason, but being on the autistic spectrum is one possible cause, and is also associated with the type of role performed by cc.

Absolutely nothing to do with trust.

Btw, fun fact: famous people with autism include Anne Hegerty, Elon Musk, Chris Packham. Anthony Hopkins.

Success case valuation of the deeps alone is estimated at 69p. Forget the other assets and business. And we know the oil is there.

Yet some plonkers are selling at 4.7p. Beggars belief.

Cheers xp, thanks for the clarification.

Sorry to sound thick, but who was the other party to the cross? Was it 3m transferred between two different accounts or brokers, with ultimately no change to your total holding? Thanks

The board are more than adequately incentivised through their sizeable bonuses which kick in for Kuat and Clive at a market cap of 800m USD (around 27p).

That'll certainly do for starters.