Member Info for bluegrass

Thanks to everyone posting this afternoon, I have enjoyed reading the posts. Nice to get back to some sensible discussions about SML with actual refenced information.

Not sure I like having my own tag line, definitely a distraction since I am pretty much irrelevant. So no more please.

You probably didn't insult me personally, but I didn't like your post/link to the Iran crisis used to insults someone else.

Probably time to drop the 'moron' header.

Hoppa you are constantly casting dispersions and labelling people, which starts these arguments, hence my first post this morning. Ok messi's comment this morning was more insulting. You did accuse me of whining yesterday, which was insulting and provocative. You are intitled to your reasoning, but why can't you trying to explain it rather than just trying to rubbish and label others. Personally I feel that your detailed price predictions are guesswork and to suit your own agender. Lets please try to stop the bickering, this board is not meant to be about peoples egos.

Messi/Hoppa can't justify your arguments so you turn to insults. Please keep this about SML. This is now getting distracting.

Thanks for the advice but have never filtered anyone. These people don't really bother me and I like to see what everyone is saying even if I don't agree with them. Only been tempted to filter with the likes of Jane etc when they post every 30 seconds.

Was wondering when realist in chief Hopper would turn up. A short while ago he was predicting a price of 6p by December and 10p in 2 to 3 years. Achieved his first target briefly this morning. I think he then said the brokers note would have no impact but suggested that price may go up to 8p and fall back to 7p. This morning he's bragging about having sold a few for 5.8p and then comes on with a de-ramp to try suggest price is too high. Clearly a trader playing games, granted a little more sophisticated than the likes of Jane and Tungsteninvestor, but still an attempt at being manipulative. Never trust anyone who posts such specific price predictions, clearly just guessing.

Messi you need to read the update. The note is very conservative and heavily discounted as it should be at this stage making an allowance for the risks you state. They have also only used $850/mtu so also heavily discounted.

Hied

I would be very careful about taking advice from people quoting specific numbers on this board, high or low. If we could do that we would all be very rich. Like brokers may have an agenda, so do people on this board. The best thing is to study the evidence the advice is based on and take the numbers with a pinch of a salt.

Hoppa, I am not going to get into a long protracted argument with you this morning since no one on here wants that and we all want SML to do well. So this is it. I don't appreciate your provocative language as regards whinning.

Your opinion of your self and your posts may be different, but I really don't think you have provided any new information on here this morning apart from a dig at another poster (or whining) and stating your own view on a good entry point. On the subject of price target, you are constantly criticising others for their 'unrealistic' targets but you are very free and easy in stating your own correct targets.

I agree that my posts do not contain the most new researched information, but think your posts lack this as well. There are many on here that do a better job with that, tungstenman included . When there is a lack of new information of course we are just talking around things in a general way.

There is nothing wrong with a range of views and I think some of the points you make are valid. However you clearly think your own views are the only correct ones. I can't have been the only one to have noticed this, but you take a slightly irritating school teacher like tone with other people who you don't agree with and you are constantly having subtle or not so subtle digs at others that you don't agree with. You clearly like adulation and people repeating your stated views. You clearly seem to have a very high opinion of yourself.

You may have the last word on this if you like. I will do my very best not to reply.

Hoppa, really not sure why you set yourself above everyone else. Yes Tungstenman is always very positive, but is clearly makes the point that he is in this for the long term. From your posts though it seems that you yourself have engaged in some short term trading. Nothing wrong with that but stop making out your views are better than everyone else’s.

Personally, taking into account any bias for being heavily invested, I think the sp should be a lot higher ‘now’ based on the prospects and comparison to peers. But everyone is not the same and for some, maybe these future worries are relevant. Maybe they will have a more limited investment or not invest at all. Some just use the company as a share trading vehicle and don’t care at all. As Mac suggested, if there was complete certainty then the value of the company would be that of a producing mine already. These things take time to work through, that is why the sp is ticking up and not jumping to its ultimate value in one go. The worries cannot be dismissed out of hand, but I did not think them to be completely relevant to the value of the sp now. If that makes sense?

Thank you both.

Just trying to reply to the ‘realism or negative points’ in a structured and non rampy way. Every now and again we get posters warning about time scales and costs way down the line. Although not irrelevant, personally I do not think they are necessarily relevant now.

Which posters are you referring to please. Hope you don’t mean meet me.

Messi. Appreciate there is a long road ahead be for an actual mine is up and running, however every project has a value at the various stages of development and it could be argued that the sp here is less than that of some comparable peers. All the drilling results to date have been excellent and the probability is that the drilling results leading to the PFS will also be good. Despite the limited income as you state SML is fully funded though to PFS and at least the end of the year, so there is very little prospect of a capital raise until after that. There also seemed to be a suggestion that there was enough capital in the bank to possibly expand the drilling area beyond that of the current MRE (possibly Dutchy lands). One can’t argue against the realism and points you are making, however that does not mean that the current market cap is not justifiable or that there is not the potential for it to go a lot higher long before a mine is up and running. SML is in pretty much a unique position as a mining explorer which is in effect self funding at this stage and not constantly under threat of capital raises to pay dubious directors inflated salaries like some companies we could all probably name.

Daltry Tungstenman. I did say good ‘week’. Appreciate there have been previous high highs. Was responding to the original post by tatt who suggested disappointment about the day ending up flat. Just think people are being unrealistic thinking sp should be going up in a straight line and then getting unjustifiably despondent. Need a little patience and faith.

Definitely a good week up 26%.

Would be a bit bizarre if the council gave a grant and then didn't support a planning application.

Yup can get quote to sell very large amounts. MM’s want your shares.

Can’t see any other reason for Angle and Zeus delaying publication other than the reason given for allowing friends to buy in before sp given boost as has been suggested. Unless there is some other good news to be released.