Member Info for Blueballsnall

Depends if you're going to buy in jb, what's your entry point target price

The problem is we have a resource that is on no ones radar Nitrogen, until we put out a CPR on this showing investment costs to possible revenue, and development plans Of The asset it will remain Off The radar. People invested here I think realise the near term potential possible with Kansas, let's hope the BOD kick it off asap. It's not what I originally invested for but it seems I may have struck lucky

Agm presentation ref Kansas...... Highlands has identified additional acreage positions with its ongoing leasing campaign (page12)

That's a question I'd put forward at the Q&A session last month , buy cheap and prove out depleted wells,but it never got any air time

Well hopefully every one can agree DTU should be on back burner with cash burn, there are bigger opportunities with our other plays DTU isn't dead so long live KANSAS, WD,HELIOS and ED some potentialy incredible revenue generating projects, maybe $1bill plus in Helios 20% of that if proved out, + 25% at WD on +48 wells, and maybe full ownership at Kansas $20k a day per well ,come on DTU can easily become irrelevant in income terms. If the king is dead so be it.

We'll soon get feed back on agm I hope some pertinent question where asked and asked again if the response too evasive

Is the company looking to put a cap on money spent on DTU short term to develop the other revenue streams, which from the outside look a far better bet on short term revenue generation ,is there a conflict of interest with the board and Diversion as they own Diversion. Probably lucky I can't make it today but I'm being to think DTU is not the Mezziah Of The fracking industry. Let's develop our other plays and get some cash rolling in.

Unfortunately I can't make the agm today,all I would say is when are they going to give possible revenue figures for the Kansas play, whatever purpose the nitrogen is sold for. We can guess at the revenues possible by flow rates and nitrogen price but it would help greatly if the company came out and said what this could be by highlighting plans for development of The acrage, 1 well 2 wells 12 wells,cost to develop the site v revenues possible. Plus what have we learnt from the third partys well in the vacinity.

I don't think any investor expects a a so called sweetener .I do expect a result from Kansas, a revenue generating one, there seems to be a lack of understanding to what this nitrogen play can deliver imo. The company needs to deliver this resource to deliver the value they have in our other plays. In my view, if Kansas delivers the rest WD 48 wells and Montana will follow .I'm starting to think DTU is becoming a side show, as the other three have so much possible income generation ,which is entirely up to the company to deliver and not on the up take of a third party. Dtu is still a profit maker but let's deliver the other three. Perhaps the boards involvement with Diversion is clouding the development of HNRs strategy as a whole.

I would just like some movement in Kansas this is the short term catalyst for me. Mores wells and start of nitrogen sales ,to get WD kicked off with our own cash, so increasing our % take in the revenue there. Then hopefully progressive development in Montana after a successful hydration result. If we can kick start Kansas our funding is secured in my view for a fair few years to move forward at an accelerated pace.

Yes a few here find the sp baffling to say the least ,and I'm sorry to say the bods need to give some feed back on this and if I can clear my diary I'll be asking this foremost . They've delivered big time on projects in my view except in their financial dealings which is maybe why CC departed .but maybe they now need to clear this up. The web site still only lists Helios and East Denver as projects what about West Denver Kansas nitrogen and the co2 play nothing on the site explaining them?? The nitrogen play probably being the major near term play to create revenue, why are these not on the site. Why is CL not shown as a 3% major holder, not even the extra shares allocated to PB are shown so the shares in the company are still out of date two weeks later... Why, they must surly have a responsible person on this, as if I was a perspective investor the web site is one Of The first places I would be looking for info. FFS keep it up to date.

Blimy quite a force going to attend anyone else

Im looking at attending but have conflicting personal bookings on the 21st at present

Sorry after this amount of time and with selling 11% to an unknown and it appears could be a US identity ,which it seems from previous discussions doesn't require a tr1 to disclose their interest over 3%(as renegade didn't), so could be holding 0% or +10% at this time and manuvouring the price to further that holding if this is correct. So could a Halliburton type company have brought into the company and growing their position. Or could it be a trading company driving the price to make a profit . To me this seems completely wrong ,but perhaps it's why we have such a good relationship with some major US companies who knows ,not me for sure.

Think RP will be getting sweaty with the agm on the horizon,could be some difficult situations arising with the SP struggling and the strange trading patterns

see if sites working

Definitely AGM question

So a single investor could be Halliburton or true or another party and wouldnt require aTR1,and why renegade never issued one.,but not named on website. But rp is top man in company surely the rules must include him?

If he's selling it's to raise funds for his 23m warrants.so circa 5m shares at this price range

Lots of sells sp holding (hope I haven spoke to soon),could there be a buy lucking in the depths.