Member Info for Blackrhino1

Sorry I thought it was obvious. You said you thought 2019 would be a quiet year for Amur, I don’t. Let’s see, can’t say much more than that

FLBW
I'm sure we all hope you're wrong too :-)
I'm not blinkered to the obstacles or what could turn against us, I am just prepared to take the risk for the potential reward. I'm happy to have dialogue with any genuine poster in case I've missed something. Sometimes we just have to agree to disagree.

You're showing your ignorance. Try to put your bigotry to one side for a moment, I'm dealing in facts here. I told you what you needed to do, do it and prove me wrong. Obviously soundbites work for a limited intelligence audience but really 'never realised they didn't have accidents on building sites' is that the best you can do?

FLBW
I'm aware of what a PFS is. We differ on what will be the effect once published. No point continuing this as we have a deadline which will shed a bit of light on the situation soon enough

I think it might be a good idea for a few to switch off their computers and not read this board for a while. In amongst the genuine investors will be comments from people who take pleasure in other peoples problems. The 'I told you so's', the 'I made money trading this' etc will be out to play and it won't make you feel any better.
Don't do anything you may regret later, this isn't over

Look at the demographics of the migrant population and consider that against the general usage rates, by age, of the NHS. The people leaving wouldn't be the ones who would have significantly used the NHS, but some will be the ones who would have provided the care and many would have contributed to its funding via taxes.
Many arguments for and against Brexit, the benefits to the NHS are definitely not one of the arguments for.

FLBW
I take your point about the PFS and credibility and totally agree. It has to be delivered by the end of Q1. That deadline was set by RY and they can't play the 'the one we produced wasn't detailed enough' card again. I also agree that some AIM directors will say what they need to (I have known a couple very well indeed and I would check the calendar if they told me it was Thursday). I think we differ though in terms of whether the PFS is a stand-alone, starting point document or one closely linked to short-term consequential announcements that will rapidly drive the share price.
Only time will tell, thankfully we have an imminent date we can measure it by

FLBW Do you think it is fiction?

For those who had taken the time to look on the Amur web site, it shows a Board of Directors (5) + Senior Management (2). Swanson is the one not included in that 7 on the Amur website under Management Team but included in the 8 for the share scheme

I believe it's 5

Hi GB33
Whatever it takes :-)
There's so many of us been waiting for the news, for so long, anything less than a bright star in the East and Robin spotted on a camel will be a bit of an anti-climax

If you believe, as many of us do, that the PFS will be followed shortly after by a number of agreements, then those agreements will be being worked up and finalised now (if not already completed) and will be working their way through the national/corporate infrastructures. Leaks will occur, they always do.

There are comments that are just so stupid you have to laugh. Well done JohnThomas, first look at the board today and I'm laughing. Switching off again, usual suspects clogging it up

I'm invested here and today's RNS confirmed excellent news. On reflection, I'd prefer it if the Chief Exec would do the interview after the RNS. As people have been saying, the RNS confirmed the very good news he gave strong hints about late last week, but I'd be interested to know why that interview was given first. It certainly caused massive speculation, ever-heightened expectations and a chance for the trolls to make hay on the back of subsequent 'enthusiastic' predictions of what the RNS might actually say. Personally I think the comms were mismanaged and I hope he reflects on that given we're expecting further transformational news. Hit the market with the RNS then sing about it.
I'm in for the long haul, just my thoughts

Listen to the interview and draw your own conclusions

What a positive interview, he's bursting to tell. I've only been in this share a few weeks since I got a tip off at a non-related shareholder meeting and if I'm excited I can only imagine what longer term holders feel like. Well done!

And you do know that the result of those drills had implications for how the nickel was mined etc and hence the options re roadmap to delivery, costs, npv etc. To save me having to reply to the other message you posted, to say Noloss has no integrity is, as you are quite well aware, ludicrous. Another one on ignore. They have let the mongrels out early this year

I agree CT We’d just had the better drilling results confirming link-ups etc. He also commented on the ‘methodical’ approach taken by some third parties (nationalities) which had extended the time taken to complete (get sign off?). If they (significant third parties) were still running the ruler over certain figures or assumptions they’d been given why publish the document? It’s primarily for them, as a shareholder I want to see it but at that time I was personally comfortable to trade my desire to see it for a document which satisfies the requirements of parties who I’m expecting to make me financially better off.

They seem to crop up everywhere GB33, although that board at times is just a madhouse.
Someone there mentioned today that derampers don't have a financial interest in the share price going down! I assume not even the ones that swear or call holders 'mugs'.
Thanks for the unbiased advice guys, if you were cleverer you'd realise you need to adopt a different approach, you're preaching to your own level, need to up it a bit

I liked the way he dealt with it. It sent a few running. DYOR, isn’t that what everyone always says? I agree with Geng, I think this was oversold, the document issue just reminded many of that