RE: Morning all17 Feb 2026 14:44
Confusedbol
Stop trying to be clever you don’t understand this at all. You just copy and paying and using AI.
I’m goin to it simple.
Arbitration in the case is the court of first instance.
Cheapest way to settle a dispute both sides agreed to it. GST has kept this simple asking for a remedy of original perchase price and opperation costs.
Formal decision given by Arbitrator.
Defendant may have come to equity with unclean hands and hasn’t accepted adjudication.
Now next step is court proceedings. Costly for both sides short term but more costly for who ever has to pay the fine bill losing side.
Now this is a process some don’t want or some do. GST has to through with it vindication. Also it stops other doing then same thing etc.
Now ask your self what was Mervyn and Choos defence…………..think thinking , has it clicked in yet.
YES you guessed it they through Hoi under the bus!!!!!
GST originally went for Merv & Choo. Disclosure released more supporting evidence against defendants.
When this goes to court judge will look at the lower courts decision being Arbitration reasonings which will be taken into consideration and persuasive only.
Arbitration decision is already on GST side