Member Info for billy101203

This would give extra added value to RTO etc

I wouldn’t be surprised if they extended until the latest trial has been completed

Its midday have a nice weekend.

Its Friday Fish and Chips time again thats come around quick.

Play nice and please come up with a better bashing narrative over the weekend ready for Monday. I'm only in until 26th then off to New York.

As for this legal action having impact on GST Fintech ect. No 1stly its Semnet issue ans its contractual law not criminal law BIG FACT.

This will also help in the Groups DD process that we identified such issue BIG PLUS

Now ask yourself not the silly question asked earlier. The UK banks since 2009 had had the colors felt by FCA for PPI claims , miselling, closing businesses down etc etc etc etc. Has it affected their licenses?

Quick example real life as of September

I support someone in a arbiration for supply of services.

It went arbiration as that was the option given by Small claims court online.

Defendant didn't agree.

Court date for 5th of Jan 2026 , courts says at your costs.

I told said person this will thrown out as his just stalling and can't provide evidence to counter.

It didn't go any further as the defendant didn't pay the upfront court costs.

Now said has a claim for lost earnings time etc. I advised no put it down to experience.

Now GST are looking at $4.2m. Merv and Choo cant feck about as the interest alone will wipe out there 22%

Its the adjudicator that gives the decision or sways it. Its none binding.

They don't like it then its next step simple.

What we want is money back or adjustment in the form of cash and the remaing 22% they own

Which is a good deal as we still own Semnet

They did wait. Remedy was given. Defendants were given the choice.

They said no.

Nero £2.50 too high?

What are you on about $4.2m is the target.

Actually I asked the question is it yum yum tine yet

However the hot air compnay has made me 20% again ooops. Goose is getting fatter

Most legal countries around the follow ELS in one form other an other a direction.

If you go Arbitration and the defendant says 'no I don't agree now' after agreeing a formal decision by adjudicator'

The civil court has the rights to say you can bring this case (defendants) infront of us and you will pay the costs as the lessor court (not bindng) gave a remedy. As all material information should have beed disclosed in Arbitration. In this case GST provided 'prima facie evidence for the remedy given. This not can't be changed as its not being claimed as fact. It can be added to if new evidence supporting original claim exists and wasn't disclosed like the addition of the 3rd defendant.

Let see who panics 1st.

Its not a massive legal war. Are you in stereo today.

Again who pays the cost winning side or losing side?

What about say if a company paid a legal firm an annual retainer as part of their DD/legal activity.

Only 39 days left. All financial activity will be locked in. Now hoping we had total control on all the pillars contributions from said pillar(s) should be more accurate.

You haven't got a clue what you saying your just picking and posting negatives and conjecture to suit a trade. Filler busting they call it I think!

If the price lowers you will be saying the same again liewise if the price increases you will use the same narrative with the a different price target.

Zag let it play out plenty of time and way to go.

Your glass empty again?

Dec

Moomins post yesterday @1633hrs hit the nail on the head

Sounds like someone has just got schooled by Massvie!!!!

Yum yum time yet!

Like i said i need retail therapy you have up set me!!!!

You have up set me so muchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

I might buy some more shares as retail therapy!!!!!!!!!!!

How was December for you?