Member Info for bigsmoke

can't be bothered checking, but as i recall you said you opened a short at 198

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WsOzrnBTHA

"Get in heavy!"

have you closed your short?

Ratknapp - perhaps my point is not clear. each to their own with how much they invest, how much they hold, etc. it is posted of apparently conflicting position of undertones of negativity that is the issue. someone, probably Jimbo himself commented on the very same point last night.

was also in and out of EVE. sold yesterday just in case. still netted a nice little profit. was only there to provide moral support. he called that right. let's hope at £5 he is calling Metro right.

wont post my holding. might make you reach for the Imodium.

is the last your IQ?
same as LTI yesterday - doesn't matter how much you hold and where - you said you sold down and now it is all patiently waiting for move up.

don't worry matlot - "and those who say they want to wait till something happens or more news are playing with fire dumbest move ever imo" - they have an equivalent of 100 shares I hear...

"Coiled spring... patiently waiting..."
- but you sold down....

Dude - read your own posts. hopefully the penny will drop.

all I can say is: THE BEST IS YET TO COME.

fair dues. too much tablet.
all I can say is: THE BEST IS YET TO COME.

respect, something to be earned. posting Metro related info is a start.

You are 200?

Wonder if Kenny Rodgers will close his position tomorrow.

Do you mean "self-conflicting Metro bashing morons" - you think that is a anme and not an apt description?
How about cross-ramping fevertree-boys?

i always was a thicko. but play the man not the ball.
Losing c. £200 on a 1 share deal - however much the equivalent is, sounds s 2pid.

No, LTI - I do not give a monkeys chuff over how much you have in LLOY, what makes your socks roll up and down, or where and how you maintain your INACTIVE trading accounts (which speaks for itself). What was apparent last week is the self-conflicting Metro bashing morons who keep pretending to be holding out for investing when they are not. they are maintly pushing an agenda.

is (per my earlier posts)
1. - The "0 trade" at 13:09:02
2. - Followed by the off-book trades, say at 13:19:08.

To use the expression used by Cud : "glaringly obvious".

you could have stopped after the fifth word.

LTI - "I bought a bet equivalent to 100 shares to avoid a £12 a month inactivity fee"
(1) - by "bet", I thought you just stated that you did not gamble?
(2) - "equivalent" - at that, your purchase was leveraged? and you claim to be low risk??