Member Info for bigsmoke

Richb7

Member since Jun 2025

InquisitiveNatur

Member since Jun 2025

PuzzledPete

Member since Aug 2025

What's not to like about today's news?

"Its why this is going the same way as QDE (ex Mast)" - what did they do with their money, what has MET1 done?

Sounds like you just don't like warrants. Would rather boiler shop trading houses get the money as opposed to the business.

You know its getting warmer when the numbnuts start losing their heads

The shorts might just get it under 20p after all.

Gulp

Plus, safer (and English speaking) territories like Canada are also a big plus.

And, I do like more gold exposure 1/ now that Andy B presents an inflation risk, and 2/ we very much might have a vertical gold co running later this year.

Like Rift, not a peep on MET1 website about Talon or the Sept 2025 investment. There seems to be so much more to the company ..

Strategic Investment in Talon Resources' AIM Listing

Metals One (AIM: MET1, OTCQB: MTOPF), a critical and precious metals developer and investor with a key focus on gold and uranium, is pleased to announce it has invested a further £200,000 in Talon Resources PLC (AIM: TAR) ("Talon"), a gold exploration company focused on North America, having originally invested £150,000 in September 2025, as detailed below. As a result, Metals One now owns 5.57% of Talon's enlarged issued share capital following the admission of Talon's enlarged share capital to trading on AIM today.

Talon Resources plc

Talon has been admitted to trading on AIM, transitioning from a Main Market cash shell to a North American gold exploration company. Its flagship asset is the 90%-owned Eagle Lake Gold Project, located in Ontario's Dryden Gold District within the prospective Wabigoon Subprovince, comprising 95 contiguous claims covering 1,986 hectares. Historical exploration at Eagle Lake returned surface sample results of up to 204 g/t Au, while only 26 shallow drill holes have been completed across the project area. Planned exploration, funded from Talon's existing cash resources, includes geophysical and geochemical surveys, together with an initial 2,000m diamond drilling programme.

Through its collaboration with MINML, Talon is applying machine learning-assisted targeting to support exploration at Eagle Lake and generate new opportunities across the Wabigoon Subprovince, supporting its broader North American growth strategy.

Investment Details

Metals One's initial loan investment in Talon - totalling £150,000 - was made on 24 September 2025. Following approval from shareholders at the general meeting which took place on 22 June 2026, the loan was converted into 15,687,945 shares in Talon.

Metals One also participated in Talon's £2.0 million equity fundraise, by subscribing for 16,000,000 new shares at a price of 1.25 pence per share. The participation results in Metals One holding a minority stake in Talon representing approximately 5.57% of Talon's enlarged issued share capital. The investment is a passive holding and does not confer any controlling interest or influence over Talon.

Additional Disclosure

The Board of Metals One notes that following the Admission of Talon's shares to AIM, Alex King, a Non-Executive Director of Metals One, has assumed the role of Chief Executive Officer of Talon. Accordingly, Mr King has been deemed to have a material interest in Talon and has not participated in any Board deliberations or decisions relating to Metals One's investment in Talon.

Daniel Maling, Managing Director of Metals One, commented:

"Metals One is pleased to invest in Talon. We believe their Eagle Lake property offers discovery potential and a pipeline of near-term catalysts. We are also very interested in their technology-led target generation approach with MINML in the wider - highly

Ang it

"Let me make it very clear to you - NO ONE duped me." - aye, right. Or, we all know why.

"I only came onto the board to warn everyone about the scam that was taking place, Understand?" - lol. so sweet of you.

Why not post about you and not the company? generate some ad hominem argumentation? generate click / view numbers. Classic.

As for 'It was not the company's fault, but was to the companies harm' - "There was a connection between the BOD and the people who they obtained money from." there was? call. the. cops. "It was their to decision to chose outsiders rather than ask shareholders for money." not uncommon at all, likely cheaper and faster, and certainly more smart money options. "The people behind scam articles which enabled vast profits to be made are UNKNOWN." methinks they are KNOWN unknowns. "There was NO harm to the company" - whaaaat? one one hand you have just criticized the company for doing it, now you are saying it has suffered no harm. Which one is it? "the nature of the scam that was taking place" - actually, the nature is not explained. Neither is the date. And we all know you have failed in providing contemporaneous proof. "The harm was entirely on those hundreds of shareholders that got caught up in the scam." - wait, you just said they did not go to the SHs but to "outsiders" which one was it? And, who is "the company" anyway, if not the shareholders? - tell, you what, get your tin foil hat back on and take a few more days to cook up more conspiracies.

Low volume, so peepee is back

Big

Maybe world cup action

Stuck?

Interesting games

Slowly slowly

Good grief, like a dog with a burst ball. Give it up LTI.

It was not the company's fault, but was to the companies harm. Therefore, your ongoing complaint is but victim shaming.

Did or did you not have the opportunity to buy at the low price and sell at the high price? Therefore, it sounds like you have buyer/seller remorse on your choice.

Not that scam articles are condoned, but methinks you're feigning things. In my experience, there are next to no stock situations where there is no manipulation up and down the shareholder chain. Where on AIM do you not find at those going long tending to bullish comments and those going short or having sold long and desirous of repeating not veering towards de-ramping comments? Therefore, it appears it is not the principle you object to but the fact it seems at least that you were duped. I get that. No one like defrauded, and all UK tax payers were with the covid support schemes and some PPE orders.

In any event, I am not sure that the people are "unknown". But we will leave that to another day.

LTI - thanks for link. It establishes three things at least. 1/ it was not the company that paid for them (which I think you had kind of implied or least led it to be inferred), 2/ it had nothing to do with real news flow, and 3/ the webpage is undated - when was this, exactly?