Member Info for bignose58

P & D before Chinese New Year.......... where are you now SecretSquirrel22 ?........lol

Heimdal,

I'm not so sure about dropping as low as 0.15 since we are still pretty low at 0.19. That said, the usual profit warning due any day now could spark a retreat, although I still wouldn't think it will drop as low as that given the expected updates still to come in the next few weeks which could mitigate it ?

Very difficult to predict the trading of an Asian mind....lol

Or just one to watch to see how it plays out ;-)

Something a little off topic, but may be of interest whilst waiting for updates here.

MHC (formaly CPT). Company have a product (MyLotus) which seemed could be useful for woman wanting to have babies and needed to know exactly when to do the bizz. Although the equipment seemed good, the price, I am sure, put people off, so not much in sales and the SP slowly declined. Marketing was carp just like here....lol (no that's not the reason for posting).

Last year they appointed a new female CEO who has a sales/marketing background and who immediately made changes (to the website too which only took a few weeks - not like this crowd who took a few years...and no that is too is not the reason for posting) and also instigated the purchase of a small outfit developing a quick C-19 tester.

Well since then (a matter of months now) the Market cap has increased by over 200% and could go a lot higher. Today for example up 30% as I write. The only reason I post is that some time ago I did mention to JG that it may be worth looking into given it was in a similar field (baby making and not just for pleasure) to our product with possibilities. Suffice to say nothing was done, which is fine although I did actually buy a handful of shares myself at the time.

Anyway, it might be worth a look for the short term as it could spike sooner than later given all the hype regarding C-19 stocks which could last another year, maybe two.... just a heads up and Remember....DYOR... ;-)

Heimdal,

Thanks for that. I admit it does read as encouraging if this could produce a steady income at 14$ a month/person (I don't think I have read any other article where a monthly fee has been quoted), however. That said, a lot more awareness needs to be made through rigorous advertising, which currently doesn't appear to be happening. (Anybody seen some real advertising apart from the occasional article ?). Hence the need for Regent to employ an experienced seasoned marketing person as I'm sure those currently running DLI can not have much (just basically scientists and lab rats aren't they ?). As we know, we wont get any help in advertising the product or company from the current 'A' team since none of them have shown themselves to have any idea how to go about it. I notice there is no mention of Regent in the article which isn't a good start.

They really need to do something now before all the competition start popping up. Anything associated with the possibility of making money usually encourages opportunists to suddenly appear. Its all about marketing, get a good sales person and they can sell you the world...... :-)

Dougie,

Exactly. I don't deny JM has no experience in doing deals, well not ones that have made pi's any money....... :-)

He certainly has no business sense otherwise the BOD would have been replaced with those who have relevant experience and as for JG. Why is he employed at a huge unwarranted 1.5mill usd salary ? This figure is way way above ceo's in other companies with similar market caps. Remember our market cap was so low at one time that his salary was well over 10% of the companies value. Who else gets that type of money? His salary should have at least been performance linked given the disaster that has happened. And to top that he gets awarded options....WTF !!!

The 0.5 was the sp used to issue a **** load of shares to his mates a couple of years ago (a discounted figure actually to 5 entities if my memory serves me right). If they haven't already sold out, they would need a 150% rise to get back to the same SP on todays figure, although that doesn't take account of the dilutionary effects on market cap.

The.Italian

You know my thoughts on that. Another dilution like the DLI + options and shareholders,will need 100% rise to get back to where we were before either of them.

Personally, I'm sure they will wait till after some money has been received (I'm sure any us upfront payment would be more than enough). That said, they will probably want to return some dosh to shareholders first to appease JM's mates who invested at 0.5. And of course no point in going down that route now soon after awarding options, which will pish off those awarded.

Dougie,

You must be referring to a different company. The BOD have no experience whatsoever in pharma or life science. They also have no experience in marketing or sales. Their only experience is in mining and related matters. That’s why we are in the position we are today with 3mill of shareholder money invested in the DBS down the drain no money and and the Australian tax not being sorted in a timely manner. There are many more failings, but I’d go far beyond the limit put on posting size......lol

Dr Mike is the only one with experience in pharma and and unfortunately for us he is not consulted on anything apart from Fortacin and even then, I’m pretty sure he is not consulted on everything.

Heimdal,

That’s about the jist of it, although any update regarding the DLI will probably be the requirement for money......;-)

Dougie,
Normally I would agree, however. Because the company’s reputation is now carp with respect to making false promises on time lines and EU sales predictions, I am sure larger investors are waiting for less risk. This also includes Jim n Jamie’s mates who have invested only to see it decimated. The only thing I can see in the short term lifting the sp is the approval to officially start phase iii and a license agreement, which hopefully occur within the next 6 months. As stated, at the moment the sp is being driven by day traders who have no thoughts of longer term. I’m also sure prospective larger investors are holding off after witnessing the manipulation that occured to buy the DLI which has resulted in next to no trust. What’s needed to be seen are hard signed agreements. Although market sentiment is currently at an all time low due to the company lies and incompetence, I’m hopeful it will change with the upcoming approvals and license agreements

Just my opinion on the matter, otherwise we would never be this Low.

No disrespect Heimdal, but how did you come up with that figure?

Any value will be calculated based on what they use as a basis. According to the announcement they use ED as a basis and the market research suggests anything between 144 to 500 us/can. Let’s say 200 on the conservative side. The us has 330mill ppl 1/8 th suffer from PE = 41.25 mill. If we assume 5%of this, that’s about 2 mill sufferers which when multiplied by 200 = 400mill usd. Assume conservatively that only 2 cans are bought a year. That’s 800mill. Year in year out. So I would think they will pay a lot more than 500mill usd. If any license includes SA too, well you can imagine the figure.

I do remember Dr Mike stating in a media interview they would accept nothing less than 1 bill.

Just my take on it if they use the figures we have been led to believe are possible. I’m sure they will not give it away too cheaply, however. It depends who they are in talks with, although personally I don’t think Pfizer will be interested. Yes they do have Viagra, but they only have that by accident. They mostly deal in other drugs. (Just my opinion on this).

If they are in talks with several companies, it could just go to the highest bidder.... ;-)

Of course all speculation on my part, but then again, WTFDIK.... lol

I'm re posting to start a new thread subject, otherwise it all gets rather confusing.....

Heimdal,

All interesting stuff, however. How does that affect startups, who, in the first few years of trading lose money hand over fist. it can take a few years before a new company turns a profit, so surely the HKSX rules must allow for this otherwise it would prevent new companies from starting and I would suspect stagnate the market with respect to new blood ?

Since RPG effectively changed course and could be considered a sort of start up, they surely are allowed a few years of losses before things start picking up, which they will once the US and China are sorted (the worlds two largest markets). Forgetting the lies and deception of the companies BOD/management, pharma companies in particular take several years to reach their goals, which is what has happened in this case, although it has taken longer due to incompetence regarding realistic timelines and mistakes.

Since the prospects here are good and RPG wont always be at a loss (famous last words.....lol), I'm inclined to take the rules with a pinch of salt, particularly since, as you have pointed out, several of possibly the worst companies are still trading. I would also suspect the rules are also probably there as a preventative measure for devious companies who might be considering listing. (purely guessing on my part) ???

So I wont be selling any of my shares just yet... ;-)

Heimdal,

All interesting stuff, however. How does that affect startups, who, in the first few years of trading lose money hand over fist. it can take a few years before a new company turns a profit, so surely the HKSX rules must allow for this otherwise it would prevent new companies from starting and I would suspect stagnate the market with respect to new blood ?

Since RPG effectively changed course and could be considered a sort of start up, they surely are allowed a few years of losses before things start picking up, which they will once the US and China are sorted (the worlds two largest markets). Forgetting the lies and deception of the companies BOD/management, pharma companies in particular take several years to reach their goals, which is what has happened in this case, although it has taken longer due to incompetence regarding realistic timelines and mistakes.

Since the prospects here are good and RPG wont always be at a loss (famous last words.....lol), I'm inclined to take the rules with a pinch of salt, particularly since, as you have pointed out, several of possibly the worst companies are still trading. I would also suspect the rules are also probably there as a preventative measure for devious companies who might be considering listing. (purely guessing on my part) ???

So I wont be selling any of my shares just yet... ;-)

Heimdal.

The massive spike following the EU launch announcement I cannot help but feel was somehow orchestrated by the company to allow the likes of Maven to cash out at, what was it they stated in the local news, with a 10x profit for its investors ? I would also expect a few other larger holders were let out too. I wouldn't be surprised if non of them wanted to shift to HK and probably had discussions with JG/JM who needed a yes vote. The only company that voted "no" was the American investment co whose name currently eludes me.... B'something.

Remember during that spike, and I hope my memory serves me correctly, effectively the all the companies shares and some were traded within a few days, which, given that between 40% and 50% were held tightly is pretty amazing and pretty suspicious.

Pure speculation on my part, but I'm pretty sure something was going on and like many other thing associated with RPG, what happened stunk to high heaven.

Also during that launch, which actually was only in the UK, they came so close to losing the EU approval since they were meant to launch the 12 dose cannister but had neglected to discuss a price point with Recordati which then forced them to launch the 20 dose cannister instead. Luckily they had a few cans for the purpose, although it was a pretty close race. So I would have thought that in itself would have held back a mad rush, which, as it turns out, it didnt.

Who knows the complexities of the Asian trader......lol

Heimdal, you are indeed correct, however. I’m not referring to the market in general, just this share which, as you know has quick rises from day traders jumping on board trying to catch a rise and then who sell off when they’ve made their % or are forced to sell through their stop losses due to buying on a spike. That’s why so many are now selling or being forced to sell on just an 11% rise.

Yes, I am no trader and don’t profess to know the stock market as well as you, but as mentioned, historically this is what happens to this share on just small announcements. Especially now with more announcements in the last 6 weeks than in 6 years. Traders are now watching this stock and jump in at the slightest indication of a rise. I’m sure there are 1 or 2 lth’s or even new lt investors, but looking at trade sizes, there cannot be that many. This will only change once there is some significant new to reduce the risk for the larger investor.

Just my take on it, but currently it’s what appears to be happening. Need to shake out the small traders first which could happen in the next few months.

I'm sure this wont hold any increase before some substantial news is release since HK/Macau and Taiwan will add next to nothing in sales value. Probably wont move before US phase III has started with the expectation of a licensing deal/License sale.

Even though HK/Macau/Taiwan have import licenses and are Chinese, it would seem China thinks the mainland folks are different hence the need for yet another study which totally contradicts the "One China" philosophy. Totally baffling really.

That's day traders for you. As long as they get their 5 to 10%, they are happy.

Its historic here. A quick jump on news then a sell off. I'm surprised you are not used to it ?

Apols following the OTC announcement it touched 0.206, it was at 0.22 on the 15th Dec following the Taiwan approval announcement.

I don't think it went above 11.1% today, but did finish at nearly 8% up. The sp touched over 0.22 with the OTC

As to whether it can hold above 0.2 is anyone's guess. We will, I am sure, find out tomorrow since it still looks like it's (from the trade sizes) still being driven by day traders. 75% of trades were for 100k shares or less with 50% of all trades below 50k shares. If anyone is interested :-)